Literature DB >> 22356886

Conflict monitoring and resolution: are two languages better than one? Evidence from reaction time and event-related brain potentials.

Shanna Kousaie1, Natalie A Phillips.   

Abstract

An advantage for bilingual relative to monolingual young adults has been found for cognitive control tasks, although this finding is not consistent in the literature. The present investigation further examined this advantage using three tasks previously found to be sensitive to the effect. Furthermore, both behavioral and event-related brain potential (ERP) measures were included. Monolingual (n=25) and highly proficient bilingual (n=26) young adults completed a Stroop, Simon, and Eriksen flanker task while electrophysiological recording took place. Behaviorally there were no language group differences on any of the tasks. The ERP measures demonstrated differences between monolinguals and bilinguals with respect to conflict monitoring, resource allocation, stimulus categorization, and error-processing; however, these differences were not consistent across tasks. Given the similar behavioral performance across the groups the observed differences in brain responses may not represent an advantage for bilinguals. The results are discussed with respect to previous findings. Copyright Â
© 2012 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22356886     DOI: 10.1016/j.brainres.2012.01.052

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Brain Res        ISSN: 0006-8993            Impact factor:   3.252


  36 in total

Review 1.  Data trimming procedure can eliminate bilingual cognitive advantage.

Authors:  Beinan Zhou; Andrea Krott
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2016-08

2.  Conflict Processing is Modulated by Positive Emotion Word Type in Second Language: An ERP Study.

Authors:  Chenggang Wu; Juan Zhang
Journal:  J Psycholinguist Res       Date:  2019-10

3.  Inhibition Efficiency in Highly Proficient Bilinguals and Simultaneous Interpreters: Evidence from Language Switching and Stroop Tasks.

Authors:  Xavier Aparicio; Karin Heidlmayr; Frédéric Isel
Journal:  J Psycholinguist Res       Date:  2017-12

4.  Do Bilingual advantages in attentional control influence memory encoding during a divided attention task?

Authors:  Natalie H Brito; Eric R Murphy; Chandan Vaidya; Rachel Barr
Journal:  Biling (Camb Engl)       Date:  2015-12-17

5.  Processing differences between monolingual and bilingual young adults on an emotion n-back task.

Authors:  Ryan M Barker; Ellen Bialystok
Journal:  Brain Cogn       Date:  2019-05-17       Impact factor: 2.310

6.  Executive function predicts artificial language learning.

Authors:  Leah L Kapa; John Colombo
Journal:  J Mem Lang       Date:  2014-08-15       Impact factor: 3.059

Review 7.  Neural correlates of cognitive processing in monolinguals and bilinguals.

Authors:  John G Grundy; John A E Anderson; Ellen Bialystok
Journal:  Ann N Y Acad Sci       Date:  2017-04-17       Impact factor: 5.691

8.  Beyond the bilingual advantage: The potential role of genes and environment on the development of cognitive control.

Authors:  Arturo E Hernandez; Maya R Greene; Kelly A Vaughn; David J Francis; Elena L Grigorenko
Journal:  J Neurolinguistics       Date:  2015-05-16       Impact factor: 1.710

9.  Interaction of bilingualism and Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder in young adults.

Authors:  Ellen Bialystok; Kornelia Hawrylewicz; Melody Wiseheart; Maggie Toplak
Journal:  Biling (Camb Engl)       Date:  2016-01-20

10.  Are bilingual children better at ignoring perceptually misleading information? A novel test.

Authors:  Meghan C Goldman; James Negen; Barbara W Sarnecka
Journal:  Dev Sci       Date:  2014-04-07
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.