| Literature DB >> 22356674 |
Takafumi Omori1, Yoshio Kamiya, Tomomitsu Tahara, Tomoyuki Shibata, Masakatsu Nakamura, Joh Yonemura, Masaaki Okubo, Daisuke Yoshioka, Takamitsu Ishizuka, Naoko Maruyama, Toshiaki Kamano, Hiroshi Fujita, Yoshihito Nakagawa, Mitsuo Nagasaka, Masami Iwata, Tomiyasu Arisawa, Ichiro Hirata.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Several study showed usefulness of microscopic capillaries, seen by magnifying narrow band imaging (NBI) endoscopy for predicting histopathology among superficial depressed or flat elevated gastric neoplasia (GN). Here we assessed the diagnostic efficacy of magnifying NBI for predicting histopathology among gastric protruding/or polypoid lesions.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2012 PMID: 22356674 PMCID: PMC3310780 DOI: 10.1186/1471-230X-12-17
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Gastroenterol ISSN: 1471-230X Impact factor: 3.067
Figure 1Classification of fine mucosal structures of gastric polypoid lesions. Fine mucosal structures were classified into following four categories: small round (uniformly arranged small round pits), prolonged (long holed or oval shaped pits), villous or ridge (villous or ridge like structures, pit is not seen), and unclear (structures is not observed) patterns.
Figure 2Classification of capillary patterns of gastric polypoid lesions. The micro vascular patterns were classified into following five categories: honey comb (uniformly arranged honey comb like appearance), dense vascular (increased density of irregular vessels in the most of area of the micro structure), fine net work (net like appearance consisted of irregular shaped micro vessels), core vascular (clearly visible coiled or wavy vessels in the central area of the mucosal structure), and unclear patterns (micro vascular patterns is not observed).
Clinicopathological characteristics of subjects
| Histopathological diagnosis | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Variables | FGP | HP | GN | GN | GN |
| Number of patients | 17 | 30 | 29 | ND | ND |
| Number of pathological lesions | 19 | 47 | 29 | ND | ND |
| Gender (male/female) | 9(52.9)/8(47.1) | 16(53.3)/14(47.7) | 23(79.3)/6(20.7) | NS | NS |
| Age (mean ± SD) | 54.9 ± 23.6 | 67.5 ± 9.4 | 72.5 ± 6.9 | < 0.0001 | 0.03 |
| Yamada's classification | |||||
| 8(42.1) | 15(31.9) | 2(6.9) | 0.04 | NS | |
| 10(52.6) | 22(46.8) | 19(65.5) | NS | NS | |
| 1(5.3) | 10(21.3) | 8(27.6) | NS | NS | |
| Size | |||||
| 7(36.8) | 17(36.2) | 0(0) | 0.002 | 0.0007 | |
| 10(52.6) | 16(34.0) | 12(41.4) | NS | NS | |
| 2(10.5) | 8(17.0) | 9(31.0) | NS | NS | |
| 0(0) | 6(12.8) | 8(27.6) | 0.03 | NS | |
| Color | |||||
| 4(21.1) | 0(0) | 5(17.2) | NS | 0.01 | |
| 15(78.9) | 2(4.3) | 9(31.0) | 0.003 | 0.004 | |
| 0(0) | 45(95.7) | 15(51.7) | 0.0005 | 0.00002 | |
| Location | |||||
| 8(42.1) | 7(42.1) | 6(20.7) | NS | NS | |
| 11(57.9) | 17(36.2) | 7(24.1) | 0.04 | NS | |
| 0(0) | 23(48.9) | 16(55.2) | 0.0003 | NS | |
| Uneven form or presence of depressed area | 2(10.5) | 8(14.2) | 12(41.4) | 0..48 | 0.04 |
| Erosion | 0(0) | 12(25.5) | 8(27.6) | 0.03 | NS |
FGP, funding grand polyps; HP hyperplastic polyps; Gn, gastric neoplasia; ND not done
GN consisted of 27(93.1%) well differentiated adeno carcinomas, and 2(6.9%) gastric adenomas
All p values were assessed by the Chi-square test, with Yates' continuity correction except for the association of age
Age was assessed by the One-way ANOVA
Prevalence of fine mucosal structures and micro vascular patterns seen by magnying NBI, among gastric protruding/or polypoid lesion, and diagnostic efficacy of those patterns for GN
| Histopathological diagnosis | Diagnostic efficacy for GN | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FGP | HP | GN | Sensitivity (%) | Specificity (%) | |
| Fine mucosal structures | |||||
| 18(94.7) | 2(4.3) | 3(10.3) | 10.3 | 69.7 | |
| 0(0) | 15(31.9) | 1(3.5) | 3.5 | 77.3 | |
| 1(5.3) | 30(63.8) | 20.(69.0) | 69.0 | 53.0 | |
| 0(0) | 0(0) | 5(17.2) | 17.2 | 100 | |
| Micro vascular patterns | |||||
| 18(94.7) | 2(4.3) | 0(0) | 0 | 69.7 | |
| 0(0) | 44(93.6) | 4(13.8) | 13.8 | 33.3 | |
| 1(5.3) | 1(2.1) | 21(72.4) | 72.4 | 97.0 | |
| 0(0) | 0(0) | 3(10.3) | 10.3 | 100 | |
| 0(0) | 0(0) | 1(3.5) | 3.5 | 100 | |
| 18(94.7) | 2(4.3) | 0(0) | 0 | 69.7 | |
| 0(0) | 14(29.8) | 0(0) | 0 | 78.8 | |
| 0(0) | 30(63.8) | 4(13.8) | 13.8 | 54.5 | |
| 0(0) | 0(0) | 3(10.3) | 10.3 | 100 | |
| 0(0) | 0(0) | 1(3.5) | 3.5 | 100 | |
| 1(5.3) | 1(2.1) | 16(55.2) | 55.2 | 97.0 | |
| 0(0) | 0(0) | 4(13.8) | 13.8 | 100 | |
| 0(0) | 0(0) | 1(3.5) | 3.5 | 100 | |
FGP fundic grand polyps; HP, hyperplastic polyps; GN, gastric neoplasia; ND, not done
Most favourable combination of micro vascular pattern for diagnosing GN were; Core vascular+ fine network+ unclear: sensitivity 86.2%, specificity 97.0%
Most favourable combination of fine mucosal structures and micro vascular pattern for diagnosing GN were; small round/fine net work+ prolonged/core vascular+ villous or ridge/core vascular+ unclear/core vascular+ unclear: sensitivity 86.2%, specificity 9.0%
Figure 3A case of gastric adenocarcinoma, presented with villous or ridge mucosal structure and dense vascular pattern. Histopathological finding of this cases showed small component of well differentiated adenocarcinoma in hyperplastic polyp (green frame), consisted with p53 immunostaining (red frame). WL, white light endoscopy; NBI, narrow band imaging; HE, hematoxylin-eosin staining.
Interobserver concordance (κ coefficient values) for micro vascular patterns
| Micro vascular patterns | κ values |
|---|---|
| 0.75 | |
| 0.73 | |
| 0.64 | |
| 0.73 | |
| 0.89 |