Literature DB >> 22356206

Perioperative outcome of patients with congenital diaphragmatic hernia undergoing open versus minimally invasive surgery.

Philipp O Szavay1, Florian Obermayr, Christoph Maas, Holger Luenig, Gunnar Blumenstock, Joerg Fuchs.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to evaluate outcome of patients with congenital diaphragmatic hernia (CDH) undergoing open versus minimally invasive surgery. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Patient records of 33 children undergoing surgery for CDH between March 2002 and September 2008 were reviewed. Patient data were compared regarding operating time, intraoperative maximum CO(2) partial pressure (pCO(2 max)) values, postoperative ventilation time, complications, and recurrences.
RESULTS: Median age at time of operation was 4 days (range, 0-1017 days), and median weight was 3800 g (range, 2000-13,200 g). Laparotomy was performed in 12 children. Seventeen patients underwent thoracoscopic repair, and four children had a laparoscopic approach. Operating time was significantly longer (P=.004) in the minimally invasive group. Median values of pCO(2 max) during operation were not significantly different (P=.25) in the minimally invasive surgery group. The pCO(2 max) values in the postoperative course were significantly lower (P=.013) in the minimally invasive group, whereas median ventilation times postoperatively were significantly longer (P=.024) in the open surgery group.
CONCLUSIONS: Median values of pCO(2 max) in the postoperative course were significantly lower in the minimally invasive surgery group. In addition, postoperative ventilation time was shorter when children underwent minimally invasive surgery. In conclusion, minimally invasive surgery seems to offer advantages for selected patients with CDH.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22356206     DOI: 10.1089/lap.2011.0356

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A        ISSN: 1092-6429            Impact factor:   1.878


  8 in total

Review 1.  Minimally invasive surgery for diaphragmatic diseases in neonates and infants.

Authors:  Jun Fujishiro; Tetsuya Ishimaru; Masahiko Sugiyama; Mari Arai; Keisuke Suzuki; Hiroshi Kawashima; Tadashi Iwanaka
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2015-07-17       Impact factor: 2.549

Review 2.  Congenital diaphragmatic hernia, management in the newborn.

Authors:  Merrill McHoney
Journal:  Pediatr Surg Int       Date:  2015-09-24       Impact factor: 1.827

3.  Congenital diaphragmatic hernia in neonates: Open versus thoracoscopic repair.

Authors:  Osama Abdullah Bawazir; Abdullah Bawazir
Journal:  Afr J Paediatr Surg       Date:  2021 Jan-Mar

4.  Minimally invasive surgery in infants with congenital diaphragmatic hernia: outcome and selection criteria.

Authors:  Chihwan Cha; Young Ju Hong; Eun Young Chang; Hye Kyung Chang; Jung-Tak Oh; Seok Joo Han
Journal:  J Korean Surg Soc       Date:  2013-07-25

Review 5.  Minimally invasive surgery for congenital diaphragmatic hernia: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Y Zhu; Y Wu; Q Pu; L Ma; H Liao; L Liu
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2015-10-05       Impact factor: 4.739

6.  Anesthetic management of thoracoscopic procedures in neonates: a retrospective analysis of 45 cases.

Authors:  Hua Liu; Chengjin Le; Jing Chen; Heng Xu; Hui Yu; Lin Chen; Henry Liu
Journal:  Transl Pediatr       Date:  2021-08

7.  Recurrence of Congenital Diaphragmatic Hernia: Risk Factors, Management, and Future Perspectives.

Authors:  Francesco Macchini; Genny Raffaeli; Ilaria Amodeo; Martina Ichino; José Luis Encinas; Leopoldo Martinez; Lucas Wessel; Giacomo Cavallaro
Journal:  Front Pediatr       Date:  2022-02-09       Impact factor: 3.418

8.  Thoracoscopic versus open repair of CDH in cardiovascular stable neonates.

Authors:  Sophie Costerus; Katrin Zahn; Kees van de Ven; John Vlot; Lucas Wessel; Rene Wijnen
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2015-10-21       Impact factor: 4.584

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.