Magnetron sputtering techniques were used to prepare molecularly smooth titanium thin films possessing an average roughness between 0.18 nm and 0.52 nm over 5 μm × 5 μm AFM scanning areas. Films with an average roughness of 0.52 nm or lower were found to restrict the extent of P. aeruginosa cell attachment, with less than 0.5% of all available cells being retained on the surface. The attachment of S. aureus cells was also limited on films with an average surface roughness of 0.52 nm, however they exhibited a remarkable propensity for attachment on the nano-smoother 0.18 nm average surface roughness films, with the attachment density being almost twice as great as that observed on the nano-rougher film. The difference in attachment behaviour can be attributed to the difference in morphology of the rod-shaped P. aeruginosa compared to the spherical S. aureus cells.
Magnetron sputtering techniques were used to prepare molecularly smooth titanium thin films possessing an average roughness between 0.18 nm and 0.52 nm over 5 μm × 5 μm AFM scanning areas. Films with an average roughness of 0.52 nm or lower were found to restrict the extent of P. aeruginosa cell attachment, with less than 0.5% of all available cells being retained on the surface. The attachment of S. aureus cells was also limited on films with an average surface roughness of 0.52 nm, however they exhibited a remarkable propensity for attachment on the nano-smoother 0.18 nm average surface roughness films, with the attachment density being almost twice as great as that observed on the nano-rougher film. The difference in attachment behaviour can be attributed to the difference in morphology of the rod-shaped P. aeruginosa compared to the spherical S. aureus cells.
Since the advent of micro/nano-fabrication, bacterial interactions with material surfaces
have been the focus of a number of intensive research programs12345. It
has become clear that surface micro/nano-topography plays a critical role in bacterial
attachment678910111213. A number of different approaches have
been adopted to investigate the bacterial response to surfaces containing different
topographies, including those fabricated with regular patterns or native irregular material
topographies1781415161718192021. For example, P.
aeruginosa and S. aureus cells were found to attach to surfaces containing
regularly spaced pits of 1 µm and 2 µm in size, yet not to surfaces containing irregularly
spaced pits of 0.2 µm and 0.5 µm in size16. Díaz et al. reported that
E. coli cells were able to successfully attach and align on surfaces containing
microgrooves of 1.3 µm width and 120 nm depth14, yet unable to attach and align
on surfaces with the groove height of 50 nm and period of 1.6 µm1. Mitik-Dineva
et al. found that the presence of pits of 2.5 µm diameter on the surfaces of etched
optical fibers restricted the extent of bacterial attachment compared to that obtained on
unmodified optical fiber surfaces, which contain irregular topographies with an average height
of 181 nm13. Several studies have shown that bacterial attachment is modulated
by the presence of regular submicron- and micron-scale surface topographies when the dimension
of these topographies is greater than about 100 nm781416. Rowan et
al. fabricated arrays of regular micron-scale patterns of size 83 µm and 12 µm on
polyethylene glycol surfaces and were able to localize E. coli cells on these
surfaces7. Rozhok et al. fabricated 3 µm diameter holes of 0.5 µm
depth in which single E. coli cells were successfully localized8. In
addition, several studies have utilized not only surface micron-scale topography but also the
surface chemistry of the substrate to control the extent of bacterial attachment. For example,
Rowan et al. and Rozhok et al. used poly(ethylene glycol) and poly-L-lysine
substrates (respectively) to enhance the degree of bacterial attachment78.
The influence of the surface nanotopography of glass and metal oxide substrates (with an
average roughness Ra of 4.1 to 17.6 nm) on bacterial attachment was reported
by Li and Logan20. It was found that both surface chemistry and topography
influenced the extent of bacterial attachment, but no conclusions were drawn regarding the
relative influences of these surface characteristics on the extent of bacterial attachment.
Bacterial interactions with metallic surfaces of various surface topographies has also
received significant attention over the last few decades1617181921.
However, there is no consensus regarding whether increased levels of surface roughness can be
correlated either positively or negatively to the extent of bacterial attachment, often as a
result of inconsistent results and a lack of systematic studies being performed1617181921. For instance, one study reported that S. epidermidis
cells were not able to effectively attach onto titanium surfaces with an average surface
roughness between 1.25 μm and 0.43 μm17. Another study reported that no
significant bacterial attachment was found on stainless steel surfaces with an average
roughness varying from 1.04 µm to 0.01 µm18. A subsequent study, however,
reported that only minimal bacterial attachment was observed on metallic surfaces with an
average roughness of 0.6 µm, whereas surfaces either smoother or rougher than these allowed a
greater number of bacterial cells to attach19. Whitehead et al. studied
bacterial attachment on titanium dioxide surfaces with different degrees of nano-scale
roughness21. This work highlighted that S. aureus cells were able to
attach in greater number to surfaces exhibiting an average roughness of 8.7 nm than that
observed for surfaces of average roughness of 43.6 nm, yet P. aeruginosa cells were
found to behave in the opposite way21. A few recent studies have shown that
bacterial cells were able to attach more efficiently onto titanium surfaces containing an
average surface roughness of below 1.2 nm2223. A similar increased level of
attachment was also reported for glass surfaces possessing an average roughness of 1.3 nm than
those for an average surface roughness of 2.1 nm1215.Despite the growing body of evidence indicating that the extent of bacterial cell attachment
is enhanced on surfaces containing nanometric scale roughness29101213152223 and that bacterial cells appear to be able to detect a
change in the average surface roughness down to dimensions as low as 1 nm, it remains unclear
as to whether molecularly smooth surfaces containing surface roughness on the sub-nanometric
scale represent a boundary below which the surface nanotopography restricts the extent of
bacterial attachment. There appears to be a paucity of work reporting the extent of bacterial
attachment on sub-nanometrically smooth surfaces, and the influence (if any) of this surface
architecture on the attachment process. This paper was designed as an extension of our
previous work21213152223 to fill this gap in the existing knowledge.
We employed a magnetron sputtering technique for fabricating the titanium thin films2425. This approach allowed the controlled atomic deposition of titanium onto a
substrate for the purposes of producing metallic thin films with sub-nanoscopic and nanoscopic
surface roughness2425. Titanium thin films with an average surface roughness
of 0.5 nm, 0.2 nm, and 0.18 nm with corresponding film thickness of 150 nm, 12 nm, and 3 nm,
respectively, were fabricated on silicon wafers with an initial average surface roughness of
0.29 nm. We have previously shown that the two strains of bacteria, P. aeruginosa and
S. aureus, have the ability to differentiate between surfaces exhibiting very small
differences in surface roughness, with a reduction in the average surface roughness from
1.22 nm to 0.58 nm resulting in a 2 to 3-fold increase in the number of attached cells,
together with an elevated level of extracellular polymeric substances secretion on the
surface. The aim of this study was to investigate the extent of bacterial attachment on the
molecularly smooth (i.e. sub-nanometric roughness) titanium thin film surfaces in an attempt
to locate the boundary, if any, of surface roughness that is able to influence the extent of
bacterial attachment on surfaces.
Results
Physicochemical Characterization of Titanium Surfaces
The surfaces of the titanium thin films were found to be hydrophobic, displaying water
contact angles between 96o and 104.5o (Supporting Information: Table S1). It appeared that the surface hydrophobicity
increased with increased film thickness (statistically significant; t-test:
t = 0.03 (p < 0.05)), with measured contact angles being approximately
96o–97o for the 3 nm and 12 nm films and
104.5o for the 150 nm films. The surface free energies were found to be
low (due to the high proportion of the dispersive components), ranging from 36 mN
m−1 for the 3 nm and 12 nm films to 39.5 mN m−1 for the
150 nm films.An XPS analysis confirmed that the surfaces of the 12 nm and 150 nm titanium films were
homogeneously covered by titanium with a concentration increasing from 17.7 at% in the
3 nm films to 21.7 at% in the 150 nm films. Up to 8.5 at% of silicon was detected on the
3 nm thickness films, due to the depth of XPS analysis being nominally around 3–5 nm.
Overall, titanium and oxygen were found to be the most abundant elements on the surface of
the films. The high resolution XPS spectra of titanium displayed three peaks, in which the
binding energy peaks at ∼458.0 eV and ∼463 eV for titanium surfaces are attributable to
TiO2, confirming the previously reported similar observations22262728.The singlet ground electronic state (X1A1) of the TiO2 molecule
possesses a C2V point group symmetry, which is given in Fig.
1. The geometric and electronic properties of TiO2 are given in Table 1. TiO2 has two equal Ti-O bond lengths of 1.641 Å
with an O-Ti-O angle of 111.9°, providing good agreement between theory and experiment.
For example, the B3LYP/LANL2DZ model produces the Ti-O bond length and O-Ti-O bond angle
as 1.685 Å and 110.8°29, respectively, and the CCSD(T)/LANL2DZ model
reported as 1.672 Å and 112.6°29, respectively. Experimentally, only an
estimate exists of the O-Ti-O angle (110 ± 5°) for the singlet ground electronic state.
The electronic spatial extent reaches 193.95 au, which
corresponds to approximately 10 nm; the molecular electrostatic potential (MEP) is shown
in Fig. 1.
Figure 1
The optimized geometry of TiO2 (top) and molecular electrostatic
potential (MEP) of TiO2 using B3LYP/cc-pVTZ model (bottom).
Table 1
Comparison of properties of TiO2 in its singlet ground
electronic state (X1A1).
This work
Refa
Refb
Properties
B3LYP/cc-pVTZ
B3LYP/LANL2DZ
Experiment
RTi-O (Å)
1.641
1.658 (1.672)d
NA
O-Ti-O (°)
111.9
110.8 (112.6)d
110 ± 5
EAa (eV)
1.61
1.69
1.59 ± 0.03
IPa (eV)
9.62c
9.75
9.5 ± 0.1
<R2>
(au)
193.95
μ (Debye)
6.65
Rotational Constants
(GHz)
a: 31.23505 b: 8.54663 c:
6.71049
aData obtained from29.
bData obtained from30.
cIP is calculated as Ecation - Eneutral
.
dThe CCSD/LANL2DZ values in parentheses.
Titanium Thin Film Surface Topography and Morphology
The results of an AFM surface roughness analysis of the silicon wafer and the 3 nm, 12 nm
and 150 nm titanium thin films over two scanning areas, 10 µm × 10 µm and 5 µm × 5 µm, are
shown in Table 2 and Fig. 2. Five parameters
were used for the characterization of the surfaces: average roughness
(Ra), root mean square (RMS) roughness (Rq), maximum
height (Rmax), skewness (Rskw) and kurtosis
(Rkur)223132. Three parameters including
Ra, Rq and Rmax were utilized to
evaluate the titanium thin films' surface topography, while skewness and kurtosis were
used to describe the surface morphology. The surface topography of the 3 nm and 12 nm
films appeared to be similar and remarkably smooth on the sub-nanometer scale, i.e.,
Ra of 0.18 nm and 0.20 nm and Rq of 0.20 nm and
0.24 nm on the 10 µm × 10 µm scanning areas; and Ra of 0.19 nm and
0.20 nm and Rq of 0.20 nm and 0.24 nm on the 5 µm × 5 µm scanning areas,
respectively (Table 2). The differences between the roughness
parameters for the 3 nm and 12 nm titanium thin films on both scanning areas were not
statistically significant (t = 0.24 for Ra and 0.20 for
Rq on 10 µm × 10 µm; t = 0.19 for Ra and 0.09
for Rq on 5 µm × 5 µm, p>0.05). The Ra and
Rq parameters of the silicon wafer surfaces were in the range 0.27 nm
to 0.37 nm on both scanning areas. The surface roughness of the 150 nm thin films remained
on the sub-nanometric scale; however, the roughness exhibited was approximately 2–2.5
times greater than that of the uncoated substratum. A statistical analysis of the
Rmax data obtained for the 10 µm × 10 µm and 5 µm × 5 µm scanning
areas highlighted that there was no significant difference between the maximum height of
the uncoated silicon wafer and the 3 nm, 12 nm and 150 nm titanium films (p >
0.05).
Table 2
AFM surface roughness analysis of titanium thin film surfaces
Ti film thickness
Average roughness (nm)
Ra
RMS roughness (nm)
Rq
Maximum height (nm)
Rmax
Skewness
Rskw
Kurtosis
Rkur
10 µm × 10 µm
0 nm
0.27±0.05
0.37±0.04
17.41±3.85
0.03±0.01
3.12±0.06
3 nm
0.19±0.01
0.22±0.01
2.81±0.17
−0.09±0.01
3.47±0.07
12 nm
0.20±0.01
0.24±0.01
6.61±1.04
0.11±0.01
2.63±0.51
150 nm
0.66±0.01
0.83±0.01
7.59±0.35
0.63±0.04
3.79±0.16
5 µm × 5 µm
0 nm
0.29±0.01
0.37±0.02
8.77±1.71
0.37±0.07
5.70±1.40
3 nm
0.18±0.01
0.20±0.02
3.30±0.17
−0.08±0.01
3.48±0.03
12 nm
0.20±0.01
0.24±0.01
3.93±0.71
−0.07±0.04
2.86±0.71
150 nm
0.52±0.01
0.68±0.03
6.00±0.17
0.43±0.10
3.35±0.31
Figure 2
Typical 3D AFM images and corresponding surface profiles of silicon wafer (a) and
titanium thin film (b, c, d respectively for 3 nm, 12 nm and 150 nm Ti thin films)
surfaces from approximately 5 μm × 5 μm scanned areas (I).
Formation of nanograins can be seen on Ti thin films. Interactive, 3-dimensional views
of the data are presented in Supplementary Figure S4: Readers using
version 8.0 or higher of Acrobat Reader can enable interactive views by clicking on the
figure panels. Once enabled, 3-d mode allows the reader to rotate and zoom the view
using the computer mouse. (II) Evolution of surface roughness after serial-deposition of
Ti on silicon wafer. Figure was constructed from typical surface profiles, by plotting
on the same set of axes, with the mean line of each profile set to the thickness of its
corresponding film. Inset is a schematic approximation of how deposited TiO2
molecules form a 3 nm thin film. A silicon (8.5 at%) was detected during XPS scans of
3 nm films due to the XPS field-depth, as shown how in certain parts of the film the
underlying substrate can be detected.
As previously reported, skewness is commonly used to describe the symmetry of the surface
and kurtosis is used to measure the peakedness of the surface223132.
All of the titanium surfaces studied here showed a Rskw close to 0 and a
Rkur close to 3, indicating that the surfaces exhibited a symmetrical
distribution of approximately bell-shaped peaks and valleys (Table
2)223132. No statistically significant difference was found
to exist between the Rkur for the three titanium thin films on both
scanning areas (p > 0.05), while the Rskw appeared to be
statistically significantly different only for the 10 µm × 10 µm scanning areas. The
Rskw and Rkur values for the 3 nm and 12 nm films
were not statistically significantly different for the 5 µm × 5 µm scanning area samples
(t = 0.69 and 0.44 respectively, p > 0.05), in contrast to those of the
150 nm films, confirming that the peaks formed on the 150 nm surfaces were higher and
sharper and valleys of these surfaces were shallower and broader than the other
samples.
P. aeruginosa and S. aureus interaction with molecularly smooth titanium
thin film surfaces
Analysis of the bacterial retention patterns that were visualized using scanning electron
microscopy (SEM) and confocal scanning laser microscopy (CSLM) indicated that the P.
aeruginosa and S. aureus cells responded in different ways to the surface
that were smooth on a sub-nanometric scale. The cell densities of P. aeruginosa on
the titanium film surfaces were found to be low and not statistically significantly
different on each of the three film surfaces (t = 0.84, p > 0.05). While
P. aeruginosa appeared to be a poor colonizer of the surfaces, S. aureus
was able to successfully colonize the surfaces of each of the titanium films (Supporting Information: Table S3, Fig. 3–4). The proportion of cells retained on the 3 nm and 12 nm film
surfaces, with an Ra of approximately 0.20 nm, was almost equivalent (no
statistically significant difference t = 0.28, p > 0.05) and more than
double that obtained on the 150 nm films, with an Ra of approximately
0.52 nm (t = 0.01 and 0.04 respectively, p < 0.05). Notably, both
bacterial strains produced an elevated amount of extracellular polymeric substances (EPS),
as inferred from the COMSTAT analysis of the CSLM images, on both the 3 nm and 12 nm films
(Fig. 3), but not on the 150 nm films (t = 0.003, p
< 0.05).
Figure 3
Typical SEM images (left) of P. aeruginosa (I) and S. aureus (II)
retention patterns onto titanium thin film surfaces of 3 nm (a), 12 nm (b) and 150 nm
(c) thicknesses after 18 h incubation.
Three-dimensional visualization (projections of CSLM images) (right) of representative
P. aeruginosa (I) and S. aureus (II) specimens on the titanium thin film
surfaces of 3 nm (a), 12 nm (b) and 150 nm (c) thicknesses after 18 h incubation and
corresponding quantification of viable cells (colored red) retained on the surfaces.
Figure 4
Bacterial cells, P. aeruginosa (black circles) and S. aureus (white
circles), attachment response on nanoscopically smooth titanium thin films surfaces
(top).
S. aureus cells attach in higher proportions on 0.2 nm roughness titanium films,
due to their ability to maintain larger contact areas. This is shown in schematic
diagrams of the contact regions between S. aureus and P. aeruginosa cells
and model surfaces (generated using Avizo 6.3) of differing roughness (bottom left). On
the rougher surface spaces remain between peaks underneath the S. aureus cell,
while on the smoother surface contact is unbroken. The outer membrane of P.
aeruginosa cells rests on top of the nanopeaks of average roughness between
0.18 nm and 0.52 nm over 5 μm × 5 μm AFM scanning areas. Peak height is exaggerated in
schematics, actual surface line profiles of the 3 nm and 150 titanium films are provided
for comparison (bottom right).
Discussion
Silicon wafers that were smooth on the sub-nanometric scale were used as a substratum for
titanium thin film deposition, and the evolution of the surface morphology of the resultant
films is shown in Fig. 2(II). The change in the surface morphology of
the films is due to the shadow effect resulting from the sputtering process33. As the atomic deposition results in a growing film with the height h(x,t), the
explanation of shadow effect was formulated according to33:where
is the total amount of
the surface diffusion current, with D being proportional to the surface diffusion; R is the
deposition rate with an exposure angle of .Initially, the sputtering led to a decrease in the surface roughness of the silicon wafer
surfaces (Ra = 0.29 nm), down to 0.18 nm on the 3 nm thin titanium film.
As the film thickness was increased to 12 nm, the resulting surface appeared to be
homogeneous, maintaining a similar topography across the surface (Ra =
0.20 nm) (Fig. 2). With further growth in the thickness of the
titanium film to 150 nm, the surface topography further evolved to a point where it became
nanoscopically rougher (R = 0.52 nm), directly as a result of
the shadow effect as previously described. This implies that the positions of low height
receive fewer deposited particles than those on the higher positions (such as on the peaks)
due to their geometrical features. The formation of nanograins was also observed (Fig. 2). This observation is in agreement with previously reported work
that describes the formation of nanograins on titanium surfaces of thicknesses between
100 nm and 300 nm33.Notably, with the surface structural evolution occurring as the films were grown, the
Rskw and Rkur parameters did not show any significant
difference (Table 1), falling quite close to 0 and 3, respectively;
thus indicating that the surfaces exhibited a symmetrical distribution of bell-peaks and
valleys.The XPS analysis confirmed that in an ambient environment, titanium is present in the form
of titanium dioxide (TiO2)2728. Since the bond length in the
TiO2 molecule was estimated as being approximately 0.16 nm (Table 1, Fig. 1), which is approximately equal to the
average roughness of the 3 nm and 12 nm titanium films, it can be inferred that these
surfaces in particular are molecularly smooth.During the evolution of the titanium films, the degree of surface hydrophobicity was found
to be positively correlated with the degree of the surface roughness, with the roughest
150 nm film surface exhibiting the highest degree of surface hydrophobicity (displaying a
contact angle of approximately 104.5°). This correlation is in accordance with the Wenzel
model which explains roughness-induced hydrophobicity34:where
and are fluid contact angles
on rough and smooth surfaces, and r is the roughness factor. If the contact angle on
a smooth surface is greater than 90°, according to the Wenzel equation, it would be expected
that the ‘rougher’ 150 nm titanium surface would exhibit a higher water contact angle
(θW = 104.5°) than that found on the smoother 3 nm and 12 nm thin titanium film
surfaces (θW = 97.4° and 96.7°, respectively), as was the case in this study.A summary of the bacterial attachment responses on titanium surfaces with an average
surface roughness between 0.2 nm and 0.5 nm is presented in Fig. 4. A
remarkably different response was observed between the P. aeruginosa and S.
aureus cells. The few available accepted theories for the explanation of differential
cell adhesion based on cell surface charge and hydrophobicity cannot adequately predict
trends in bacterial adhesion in this case203536, with each of these
models predicting an opposite outcome to that observed in this study. S. aureus is
the more negatively charged bacterium of the two under investigation (ζ =
–35.2±0.2 mV, Supplementary Table S3), and therefore is expected to
exhibit the weakest attachment propensity based on surface charge alone. On the other hand,
since the surface of the P. aeruginosa cells exhibited a slightly more hydrophilic
nature, with a water contact angle (θ) of 43°, compared to that of S. aureus,
which exhibited less hydrophilicity (θ = 72°), it might be expected that the S.
aureus cells would exhibit the stronger attachment propensity towards the highly
hydrophobic surfaces encountered in this study. We found that on the titanium films the
attachment of S. aureus cells was stronger than that of P. aeruginosa cells.
In addition, S. aureus cells were found to attach in greater numbers to the
molecularly smooth titanium surfaces with water contact angles of 97° than those with a
water contact angle of 104.5o. It is also noteworthy that the S.
aureus cells failed to attach onto nano-scale smooth (Ra = 181 nm)
optical fiber surfaces with similar hydrophobic characteristics (water contact angle, θ =
106°) in a previous study13.It appears that P. aeruginosa cell attachment is markedly restricted on titanium
surfaces with an average roughness equal to or below 0.5 nm, where less than 0.5% of cells
were retained on the surface. Conversely, S. aureus cells exhibited striking
attachment persistence to attachment, especially on the 3 nm and 12 nm films, resulting in
an almost twofold increase in attached cell density compared to that observed on the 150 nm
film surfaces. Taking into consideration that the physicochemical surface characteristics of
titanium thin films were the same for both types of cells, it is likely that the difference
in the attachment behavior originates from the differences in membrane rigidity and
stretching, a property that is a function of cell morphology3738. The
cellular morphology is an indirect indication of the turgor pressure inside bacterial cells
which plays a contributing role in place of a cytoskeleton37. Spherical cells
such as S. aureus, have been shown to possess higher turgor pressures than rod-shaped
cells, e.g., P. aeruginosa3940. This effect may explain the
different attachment propensity of the two types of cells onto the molecularly smooth films.
Low turgor pressures allow for large variability of cell shapes, since their cell membrane
is relaxed and therefore has the ability to undergo modifications in shape and fluctuate
with almost no energy cost. In addition, fluctuations of a relaxed membrane near an
attractive surface generate the repulsive force known as Helfrich repulsion, which is able
to induce the unbinding transition41. Thermal fluctuations can be magnified
by the presence of an attractive surface4243. It was recently demonstrated
that monocytic cell membranes can undergo fluctuations with amplitude of 5 nm44. Cells are able to detect the presence of foreign surfaces at a separation distance of
50 nm, and are able to establish molecular contact in the range of 30 nm–40 nm4445. In turn, high turgor pressures within a bacterial cell can cause the
membrane to stretch (as described by the Laplace expression relating surface tension to
pressure). As a result, the thermal fluctuations of a stretched membrane are reduced394346. The spherical cell geometry of S. aureus cells may therefore
have allowed each attaching bacterium to establish a greater area of contact on the
smoothest surfaces3943. Based on this hypothesis, a schematic model was
constructed that demonstrated that the superior surface contact adopted by the S.
aureus cells resulted in their ability to maintain attachment onto molecularly smooth
surfaces (Fig. 4).In summary, the data obtained in this report showed that the extent of bacterial attachment
to surfaces that are molecularly smooth is different for the two types of bacterial strains
used in this study. As the average surface roughness decreased from 0.52 nm to 0.18 nm, the
spherical S. aureus cells increased in their propensity for attachment to the surface
almost twofold, whereas the rod-shaped P. aeruginosa cells attached equally poorly to
each of the molecularly smooth titanium films. We propose that the morphology of the
bacterial cells (whether spherical or rod-shaped) is an indirect indication of the ability
for the membrane to deform. As a result, spherical cells are less deformable and more
effectively adhere to smoother surfaces. We believe that our study highlights the
significance of membrane deformability of different cell morphologies on the attachment
process onto molecularly smooth surfaces, where previously known mechanisms such as through
interactions with the flagella and fimbriae or EPS failed to promote bacterial adhesion.
Methods
Fabrication of titanium surfaces
The titanium thin films of 3, 12 or 150 nm thickness (henceforth referred to as 3, 12 or
150 nm films) were prepared using pre-cleaned silicon wafers (<100>, NOVA Electronic
Materials, Inc.) using a Kurt J Lesker CMS-18 magnetron sputtering thin film deposition
system as previously described22.
Titanium thin film surface characterization
The surface compositions of the titanium-coated silicon wafers were determined from X-ray
photoelectron spectra using a Kratos Axis Ultra DLD spectrometer (Kratos Analytical Ltd,
U.K.), according to the previously described methodology22. The contact
angles of different solvents on titanium thin films were measured using the sessile drop
method47. A scanning probe microscope (SPM) (Solver P7LS, NT-MDT) was
used to obtain images of the surface morphology and to quantitatively measure and analyze
the surface roughness of metallic surfaces on the nanometer scale. The analysis was
performed as described elsewhere22. All samples (four for each condition)
were first scanned with a 10 µm × 10 µm field of view to ensure that an even surface
coverage was obtained and to avoid the presence of damaged and/or contaminated areas (data
not shown), before selecting the 5 µm × 5 µm areas for scanning and analysis. All of the
roughness data presented here are an average of four scans.Statistical data processing was performed using the SPSS 18.0 program (SPSS Inc.,
Chicago, Illinois, USA). Paired t-tests were performed to evaluate the consistency
of surface roughness parameters.Interactive three-dimensional (3D) visualization of the titanium surface was undertaken
with a custom C-code and the S2PLOT graphics library48. The input data
files were in NT-MDT format, and fed into the viewing tool (mdtview) using a modification
of the NT-MDT module of the open software Gwyddion by David Necas and Petr Klapetek
(http://gwyddion.net/, Version 2.12). NT-MDT files were converted into a
three-dimensional surface, colored according to height, and displayed with the S2PLOT
s2surpa function. Visualizations were exported from mdtview to an intermediate VRML
format, with textures for axis labels in TGA format. Textures were converted to PNG
format, and the VRML model was imported into Adobe Acrobat 3D Version 8 to create an
interactive figure, using the approach described by Barnes and Fluke49.
JavaScript commands were used to provide additional functionality. In the on-line version
of this paper, the interactive Figure S4 can be viewed by mouse
clicking on the four panels, provided Adobe Reader Version 8.0 or higher is used. This
opens a window where the surface can be examined interactively using the mouse to control
the camera orientation and zoom level.
Computer modeling
The geometry of the singlet neutral titanium dioxide (TiO2) in isolation was
fully optimized at the hybrid density functional theory (DFT) level, using the
B3LYP/cc-pVTZ model, incorporated in the GAUSSIAN09 computational chemistry package50. Subsequent harmonic vibrational frequency analysis was used to identify the
nature of optimized stationary points as real local minima (without any imaginary
frequency), transition states (with only one imaginary frequency) or higher-order saddle
points (with more than one imaginary frequency).The three-dimensional model surfaces were constructed by generating two-dimensional
height data using Microsoft Excel and Avizo Software, version 6.3.
Bacterial Growth and Sample Preparation
Two bacterial strains, Staphylococcus aureusCIP 65.8 and Pseudomonas
aeruginosa ATCC 9027, were used. Bacterial strains were obtained from the
American Type Culture Collection (ATCC, USA) and the Culture Collection of the Institute
Pasteur (CIP, France). Bacterial strain stocks were prepared in 20% glycerol nutrient
broth (Merck) and stored at –80 °C. Both strains were cultured on nutrient agar (Oxoid)
and nutrient broth (Oxoid) at room temperature (ca. 22 °C). In addition, incubation
at 37 °C was also tested to confirm whether the bacterial attachment patten will be
affected. No statistically significant differences were found (data not shown).Prior to each experiment, a fresh bacterial suspension was prepared as previously
reported22. At least two independent experiments in triplicate and with
correspondent controls have been performed.
Visualization and Quantification of Viable Cells and EPS
In order to visualize viable bacteria and the EPS, standard staining techniques were
used. The bacteria were stained with SYTO® 17 Red (Molecular
ProbesTM, Invitrogen) and the EPS was stained green with Alexa
Fluor® 488 (Molecular ProbesTM, Invitrogen), a conjugate
of succinylated concanavalin A22. Images of the bacteria attached to
titanium surfaces and the EPS were recorded with a confocal laser scanning microscope
(CSLM) Olympus Fluorview FV1000 Spectroscopic Confocal System. The system included an
inverted microscope OLYMPUS IX81 [with 20×, 40× (oil), 100× (oil) UIS objective lenses]
and was operated with multiple Ar, He and Ne laser lines (458, 488, 515, 543, 633 nm). The
488 nm laser was used to image the concanavalin A Alexa® 488 dye and the
543 nm laser was used to image the SYTO® 17 Red. Avizo package, version 6.3
was employed to process the CSLM images and construct 3D visualization.To quantify 3D biofilm image stacks, specialized computer software, COMSTAT, was
used51. Scanned areas were exported into a stack of grey-scale 8-bit
images by Fluoview FV 7.0. Two quantitative parameters of biomass density were used to
describe the pattern of attached bacterial cells on the titanium surfaces51: (i) the biovolume, which encompasses both cells and EPS, and (ii) the average biofilm
thickness. Both parameters have the dimension of length: the biovolume represents the
overall volume of the cells and EPS per unit area of substrate and the average biofilm
thickness provides a measure of depth size of the cells and EPS. For the purposes of
statistical analysis twenty five fields of view were examined.In all scanning electron microscopy experiments, titanium surfaces with attached bacteria
were gold-coated as previously reported22. High-resolution images of
titanium thin films with the retained bacterial cells were taken using an FESEM (ZEISS
SUPRA 40VP) at 3 kV at 1,000×, 5,000× and 20,000× magnification. Images at 1,000× and
5,000× magnification were used to calculate the number of bacteria attaching to the
titanium surfaces; the results were statistically analyzed. Each of attachment experiments
were repeated twice and five data points of each repeat were collected.
Author Contributions
E.P.I. designed the study, analyzed data, wrote the paper; V.K.T. performed surface
characterization, collected data on bacterial attachment experiments, and helped write the
paper; H.K.W. prepared figures 2–4, helped write
the paper; V.B. was involved in the study design; J.W. was involved in sample fabrication,
AFM and SEM data analysis; C.F. was involved in AFM data analysis contributing in Figure 2 preparation; N.M. and F.W. performed computer modeling; R.J.C.
was involved in the study design, data analysis, and helped write the paper. All the authors
discussed the results, commented on the manuscript, and approved the manuscript.
Authors: Vi K Truong; Rimma Lapovok; Yuri S Estrin; Stuart Rundell; James Y Wang; Christopher J Fluke; Russell J Crawford; Elena P Ivanova Journal: Biomaterials Date: 2010-02-16 Impact factor: 12.479
Authors: Sébastien F Lamolle; Marta Monjo; Marina Rubert; Håvard J Haugen; Ståle P Lyngstadaas; Jan E Ellingsen Journal: Biomaterials Date: 2008-11-20 Impact factor: 12.479
Authors: Rita López-Cebral; Guangjia Peng; Lara L Reys; Simone S Silva; Joaquim M Oliveira; Jie Chen; Tiago H Silva; Rui L Reis Journal: J Mater Sci Mater Med Date: 2018-02-02 Impact factor: 3.896
Authors: Elena P Ivanova; Denver P Linklater; Marco Werner; Vladimir A Baulin; XiuMei Xu; Nandi Vrancken; Sergey Rubanov; Eric Hanssen; Jason Wandiyanto; Vi Khanh Truong; Aaron Elbourne; Shane Maclaughlin; Saulius Juodkazis; Russell J Crawford Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2020-05-26 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Vy T H Pham; Pandiyan Murugaraj; Falko Mathes; Boon K Tan; Vi Khanh Truong; Daniel V Murphy; David E Mainwaring Journal: Sci Rep Date: 2017-11-21 Impact factor: 4.379