The causal agent of Kawasaki disease (KD) remains unknown after more than 40 years of intensive research. The number of cases continues to rise in many parts of the world and KD is the most common cause of acquired heart disease in childhood in developed countries. Analyses of the three major KD epidemics in Japan, major non-epidemic interannual fluctuations of KD cases in Japan and San Diego, and the seasonal variation of KD in Japan, Hawaii, and San Diego, reveals a consistent pattern wherein KD cases are often linked to large-scale wind currents originating in central Asia and traversing the north Pacific. Results suggest that the environmental trigger for KD could be wind-borne. Efforts to isolate the causative agent of KD should focus on the microbiology of aerosols.
The causal agent of Kawasaki disease (KD) remains unknown after more than 40 years of intensive research. The number of cases continues to rise in many parts of the world and KD is the most common cause of acquired heart disease in childhood in developed countries. Analyses of the three major KD epidemics in Japan, major non-epidemic interannual fluctuations of KD cases in Japan and San Diego, and the seasonal variation of KD in Japan, Hawaii, and San Diego, reveals a consistent pattern wherein KD cases are often linked to large-scale wind currents originating in central Asia and traversing the north Pacific. Results suggest that the environmental trigger for KD could be wind-borne. Efforts to isolate the causative agent of KD should focus on the microbiology of aerosols.
Kawasaki disease (KD) is a pediatric self-limited vasculitis that is the most common
cause of acquired heart disease in children in the US and Japan12. KD
is characterized by immune-mediated damage to the coronary arterial wall and myocardium.
Approximately one-quarter of untreated patients will develop coronary artery aneurysms,
which in some cases can lead to myocardial infarction and death345.
As there is no diagnostic test, confirmation of cases relies solely on the
identification of a constellation of clinical signs that include fever, rash,
conjunctival injection, cervical lymphadenopathy, changes in the oral mucosa, and edema
and erythema of the hands and feet in association with laboratory studies showing marked
systemic inflammation367. Although Kawasaki saw his first patient in
1960 and in the ensuing 50 years many etiologies have been proposed89,
the agent that triggers the inflammatory response has still not been identified10. Although temporal and spatial clustering of cases has been reported,
nothing is known about the factors that influence KD seasonality1112.
Increasing KD incidence has been documented in many regions with Japan as the most
dramatic example1314. However, whether this represents improved case
recognition or an actual increase in KD incidence remains a matter of ongoing debate.
The seasonality of KD has been noted in many regions but has been most extensively
studied in Japan, the country of highest incidence, where the cause for the seasonal
variation of cases still remains a mystery111516171819.In the present study, an analysis of time series of KD patients in three geographically
distant regions suggests that the agent responsible for KD is transported through broad
scale wind currents. Using a set of analyses that separately considers the 3 major
epidemics in Japan, the recurrent seasonal cycle at each of the three locations, and the
interannual, year-to-year variability in Japan and San Diego, we show how fluctuations
in numbers of KD cases are associated with similar fluctuations in the wind circulation.
The seasonal analyses suggest that the peak in KD cases at each of the three locations
is linked to a coherent seasonal shift in winds that simultaneously exposes Japan to air
masses from central Asia, and Hawaii and California to air masses from the western North
Pacific. The interannual analysis also suggests that the enhancement of this
trans-Pacific circulation pattern is associated with unusually high KD activity in Japan
and San Diego.
Results
Epidemics
The monthly time series for KD cases in Japan since 1970 showed two dramatic
nationwide epidemics lasting several months and peaking in May 1982 (16,100
annual cases) and March 1986 (14,700 annual cases), respectively. A third
epidemic, much lower in magnitude, peaked around April 1979 (6,700 cases) (Figure 1a). These three peaks represent the largest KD
epidemics events ever recorded worldwide and provide an opportunity to
investigate KD dynamics and possible climate relationships. To investigate a
possible influence from large scale environmental factors, sea level pressure
and surface winds were averaged for the June-July-August summer months before
the onset of the epidemics (panels b1, c1 and d1 in Figure
1), and from September to the month prior to the peak in KD cases
(panels b2, c2 and d2).
Figure 1
Major epidemics of monthly KD incidence in Japan.
The three main historical KD epidemics are highlighted in red in panel a
(cases). Time averaged sea level pressure (hPa) and surface winds (m/s)
prior to the March/May 1979, May 1982 and March 1986 epidemics are shown in
panels b, c and d, respectively. Monthly atmospheric variables were averaged
for the preceding summer (JJA 1978 in b1, JJA 1981 in c1, and JJA 1985 in
d1), when winds from the south typically blow across Japan, and for the
rising phase of the epidemics, from September to the last month before the
peak (Sep 1978 to Mar 1979 in b2, Sep 1981 to Apr 1982 in c2, and Sep 1985
to Feb 1986 in d2) , when winds shifted and blew from the northwest. Colored
dots depict the increase in KD incidence (per million inhabitants) by
prefecture between the preceding September and the peak (Apr 1979 minus Sep
1978 in b2, May 1982 minus Sep 1981 in c2, and Mar 1986 minus Sep 1985 in
d2).
Prior to the beginning of the epidemic peaks, low numbers of KD cases coincided
with southerly winds (winds from the south) blowing over Japan for the entire
summer (panels b1, c1 and d1 in Fig.1), a wind pattern
which corresponds to the typical summer climatological configuration (e.g. see
Supplementary Video 1). Immediately after the beginning
of autumn, the number of cases rapidly mounted all over Japan when winds turned
northwest in direction. Colored dots in panels b2, c2 and d2 illustrate the
synchronization of the increase in KD cases throughout Japan coinciding with a
shift to northwesterly winds in both peaks. Just after the peak in each
epidemic, the winds again shifted and blew from the south, and a marked decrease
in the number of KD cases occurred (results not shown).
Interannual anomalies
To investigate further whether the influx of air from continental Asia is
associated with fluctuations in numbers of KD cases, the Japanese dataset
spanning the period from 1987–2006 was examined (Supplementary Figure 1). This segment of the time series excluded the
major KD epidemics in Japan discussed above. Therefore, major interannual peaks
and troughs of KD cases in Japan were selected for this post-epidemic period
(red and blue anomalies in Figure 2a, respectively), and
corresponding atmospheric anomalies were then composited. Years with increased
numbers of KD cases in Japan were significantly associated with enhanced local
northwesterly winds, as a result of an anomalous area of low pressure centered
to the north of Japan (Figure 2b). Conversely, the
composite of the major troughs in KD cases was linked to a quite different
pattern in which an area of anomalous high pressure developed over the border
between Russia and China, thus driving northeasterly winds from the Pacific
Ocean across Japan (Figure 2c).
Figure 2
Surface configuration for the major interannual peaks of KD incidence in
Japan.
Panel a depicts the standardized (unitless) interannual reconstructed
component of the original monthly time series of KD shown in Supplementary Figures 1a. The 7 (5) interannual peaks (troughs)
reaching the +1 (−1) standard deviation criterion are dashed in red
(blue). Standardized (unitless) interannual anomalies of sea level pressure
and surface winds were composited in panel b (c) for the set of months when
these peaks (troughs) were observed. Thick contours depict regions with
significant interannual sea level pressure anomalies (p <0.05).
To assess whether year-to-year variations in wind patterns are associated with
interannual fluctuations in KD numbers on the other side of the North Pacific,
similar analyses were conducted for San Diego. The atmospheric connection from
continental Asia to Japan and San Diego is complex, and the atmospheric pathways
connecting both shores of the Pacific can result from many different
trajectories throughout the North Pacific. However, it was possible from this
analysis to allocate all major interannual peaks of KD cases occurring in San
Diego during the 1994–2008 period as belonging to two main atmospheric
configurations. On the one hand (during green peaks in Figure
3a: 1994/95, 1997/98, 2002/03, 2004/05), zonal winds were intensified
in the subtropics between 25N and 35N (Figure 3b and Supplementary Figure 2a), thus connecting the Asian continent
and Japan to San Diego along a direct zonal path developing at all vertical
levels (Figure 3c and Supplementary Figure
2c). On the other hand (during orange peaks in Figure
3a: 1999, 2006, 2007/08), the zonal trajectory appeared to be blocked
in the subtropics (Figure 3d and Supplementary Figure 2b), but an alternative and shorter (in terms of
distance) geodesic path was opened across the northern extratropics (Figure 3e and Supplementary Figure 2d),
with enhanced westerly winds developing there. Therefore, interannual wind
anomalies were associated with peaks in the numbers of annual KD cases in San
Diego with the trajectory operating at different latitudes in two main patterns.
Similar analyses were performed for other meteorological variables exhibiting
seasonality, including minimum and maximum temperature, soil moisture and
precipitation, but a similar association with KD did not emerge (results not
shown).
Figure 3
Upper-troposphere wind configuration for the major interannual peaks of KD
incidence in San Diego.
Panel a depicts the standardized (unitless) interannual reconstructed
component of the original monthly time series of KD shown in Supplementary Figures 1c. Standardized (unitless) interannual
anomalies (b,c) and actual observations (d,e) of 300 hPa wind
direction and intensity were composited for the 4 green (b,d) and 3 orange
(c,e) interannual peaks in panel a. Thick contours in panels b and c depict
regions with significant interannual wind intensity anomalies (p <
0.05).
Seasonal cycle
Seasonality represents a prominent contribution to the overall variance in the
number of KD cases in Japan, especially when compared to interannual variability
of the disease (44% vs. 11%, respectively). Examination of KD time series from
Japan, San Diego and Hawaii show a nearly synchronized peak in KD activity from
November through March (cf. Figures 4a–c),
suggesting a shared mechanism explaining the seasonality of the disease in the
three sites. A comparison between the number of KD cases and wind patterns was
performed for the interval 1996–2006, the period for which there was data
for all three study sites (Figure 4 and Supplementary Figure 3). In Japan, northwesterly winds (NW-WIND) were
studied by projecting the observed winds onto a unit vector in the
northwest/southeast direction in order to conform to the results observed in
Figures 1b2,c2,d2 and 2b. Thus,
positive values of NW-WIND correspond to winds blowing from the north, northwest
or west, while negative values correspond to winds from the south, southeast or
east. To characterize the pathway across the north Pacific from continental Asia
and Japan to Hawaii and San Diego (e.g. Figures
3b–e), a Pacific Zonal Wind Index (P-WIND) was defined as the mean
of the zonal component of winds along the subtropical north Pacific (see the
horizontal green line in Figures 5a,b).
Figure 4
KD and surface winds in Japan (a), San Diego (b) and Hawaii
(c).
Time series correspond to KD incidence (red lines in a, b and c), the
northwestern component of surface winds in Japan (NW-WIND, blue line in a;
m/s), and the Pacific Zonal Wind Index (P-WIND, blue lines in b and c; m/s).
NW-WIND is defined as the projection of the horizontal two-dimensional wind
onto a unit vector in the northwest/southeast direction (i.e.
cos(45°)·uwind −sin(45°)·vwind). P-WIND is
defined as the mean zonal wind along 35°N between longitudes 140°E
and 240°E (see the horizontal green line in Figures
5a,b). P-WIND is shown here for the surface level, but similar
results were found for the middle and upper troposphere (e.g. Figure 5d). KD time series for San Diego and Hawaii are
reconstructed components obtained after applying an eigendecomposition
analysis to the KD data, to better isolate the annual component (see
Methods). KD cases in Hawaii were accumulated prior to the
eigendecomposition.
Figure 5
Tropospheric winds in the North Pacific.
Climatological January values are depicted for sea level pressure (hPa, a),
surface winds (m/s, a), geopotential height at 300 hPa (m, b), and
winds at 300 hPa (m/s, b). Panels c and d depict the seasonal cycle
of the northwestern component of tropospheric winds in Japan (NW-WIND, m/s)
and of the Pacific Zonal Wind Index (P-WIND, m/s), respectively. NW-WIND is
here defined as the projection of the horizontal two-dimensional wind onto a
unit vector in the northwest/southeast direction (i.e.
cos(45°)·uwind
−sin(45°)·vwind). P-WIND is defined as the
mean zonal wind along the parallel 35°N between longitudes 140°E and
240°E (see the horizontal green line in panels a and b).
The coherence between NW-WIND, wind intensity (WI) and KD cases in Japan mirrored
the relationship found for the main KD epidemics and the interannual anomalies
(Figure 4a and Supplementary Figure
3a). The number of KD cases was indeed highest in winter, when strong
northwesterly winds blow across Japan from central Asia. In contrast, there are
fewer KD cases during the rest of the year, when winds become weaker or even
change direction. Farther east, a similar coherence between the number of KD
cases in San Diego and Hawaii and P-WIND was observed (Figures
4b,c and Supplementary Figure 3b,c). Minor peaks
in other seasons were also evident. The Empirical Orthogonal Function (EOF)
decomposition, applied to both KD and winds, recovered all main sub-annual
variability portions in the two variables. Both contained a summer peak, wherein
there is a return to northwesterly wind currents, consistent with the
association to the major KD peak in cases in winter (Supplementary
Figure 4).The seasonal structure of NW-WIND is very similar to that of P-WIND, as both
share the same driving atmospheric configuration emerging in winter in the North
Pacific (Figure 5 and Supplementary Videos
1–3). In the lower troposphere, the high and low pressure areas
near Siberia and the Aleutian Islands, respectively, reach the highest intensity
in December and January, when they cover the whole eastern Asian continent as
well as the extratropical North Pacific. During the entire winter, but
especially in these months, the low level circulation sweeps from continental
China, along the lower mid-latitudes and subtropical north Pacific to the west
coast of the U.S. The atmospheric path is also open at higher levels of the
troposphere in winter. The Pacific jet stream crosses the north Pacific and
reaches its greatest strength and farthest equatorward coverage during the
boreal winter. Since the free troposphere westerly winds extend more to the
south, they would also blow over Hawaii at these atmospheric levels. The linking
of these distant regions through wind currents might therefore explain the
nearly simultaneous annual peak of KD in Japan, Hawaii and San Diego.In spring, the Aleutian low becomes much weaker and a strong high pressure
develops in the subtropical north Pacific. At the same time, northwesterly winds
are interrupted in Japan and the path across the north Pacific is redirected to
even higher latitudes in the North Pacific. Similarly, in the free troposphere,
the atmospheric path is much weaker and shifts more to the north in spring and
summer. This springtime interruption coincides with the seasonal decline in KD
cases in both San Diego and Hawaii.
Discussion
In this study, an examination of KD time series from three locations with high KD
incidence, namely Japan, Hawaii and San Diego, revealed that a common seasonal
increase in KD cases is associated with a large scale shift in the Asia-North
Pacific wind pattern. This involves the wintertime development of a
“duct” that sweeps from Asia to the western North Pacific and an
associated trans-Pacific transport across the North Pacific from Japan to Hawaii and
southern California. Other climatologic variables tested did not show the same
degree of coherency with variations in numbers of KD cases as were found for wind
and pressure patterns and therefore, did not pass cross-validation tests across
sites and scales. The close timing of seasonal peaks in the three study locations,
and the synchrony of these peaks with strong seasonal Asian and trans-Pacific wind
patterns suggests that the causal agent of KD may be transported across the north
Pacific by the strong air currents developing in the upper troposphere. Although the
movement of an infectious agent on these wind currents would seem the most plausible
explanation202122, the role of pollutants or other inert
particles transported in these air masses should also be considered23. Both hypotheses are currently being investigated.The potential for an infectious agent to survive the conditions of low temperature
(<−40°C), low relative humidity (< 30% in the western north
Pacific), and high ultraviolet exposure is clearly documented in the case of African
dust particles harboring Aspergillus sydowii that is responsible for diseases
affecting coral in the Caribbean24. Many species of viable,
UV-resistant bacteria have also been isolated from the upper troposphere25 Although links between humanrespiratory disease and large scale
dust transport are well-documented, to date there has been no evidence of long-range
wind transport of an infectious agent causing human disease24.From a practical point of view, results described in the present study suggest that
it may be possible to predict KD activity, even without knowledge of the nature of
the etiologic agent. The ability to forecast periods of increased disease activity
in localized geographic regions would benefit physicians who must identify KD
patients from among the hundreds of children with benign rash/fever syndromes26. Forecasting of KD using the models presented here can be tested in
areas of the northern hemisphere that are climatologically connected to the Asian
continent through the free troposphere zonal westerly winds.In summary, these novel results provide a testable hypothesis that the causal agent
of KD is possibly distributed by the wind. These experimental predictions and the
investigation of aerosolized micro-organisms would provide a means to focus more
narrowly the search for the etiologic agent.
Methods
Time series of KD patients were gathered for Japan, Hawaii, and San Diego, three
locations with high incidence of KD31316. In the three sites, the
date of hospital admission was recorded for all subjects and, for subjects with
multiple admissions, only the first hospitalization date was used. To provide
uniform assessment among sites, the date of admission was used as a surrogate for
the date of fever onset, even though for comparison with other studies, the average
day of KD diagnosis is normally centered on the 5th day of fever.
However, analyses were reproduced with calculated dates of fever onset and results
did not differ (t-test, p<0.001). The Japanese data set derived from 16
separate questionnaire surveys of hospitals in Japan. Spanning the period
1970–2008, it provides the most comprehensive record of KD cases in the
world1718 (Figure 1a). Data were analyzed
for the 47 prefectures with a total of 247,685 cases over the 39-year period. Dates
of hospital admissions for Hawaiian KD patients were obtained by review of hospital
discharge diagnosis codes (ICD-9 code 446.1) for the interval 1996–2006 and
totaled 498 cases. The time series for hospital admissions in San Diego was
assembled from the database of the Kawasaki Disease Research Center at the
University of California, San Diego. This database, spanning the period
1994–2008, captures more than 90% of the patients diagnosed with KD in San
Diego County11, and contained a total of 749 patients.KD time series were decomposed into orthogonal frequency components2728 and those significant components (p<0.01) depicting
variability at particular timescales were kept for further analyses (i.e.
interannual in Figures 2a and 3a, annual
and subannual in Figures 4b–c and Supplementary Figures 3b–c and 4; see also Supplementary Information for further details). The
eigendecomposition analysis applied to the data covariance matrix, was used to
partition signal contributions by frequency, with the aid of adaptative
nonparametric functions29. An embedding dimension or order of the
decomposition of 40 was selected, as it allows a proper characterization of signals
of period higher than the year, for monthly data2830.Of the three
locations, only Hawaii did not exhibit a significant interannual component.
Therefore, Hawaii was not included in the interannual analyses and only seasonality
there was studied. Atmospheric data was derived from the NCEP/NCAR reanalysis3132.High-frequency variability (i.e. periods shorter than 18 months) for the computation
of spatiotemporal interannual atmosphere anomalies in Figures
2b–c, 3b–e and Supplementary Figures 2 was removed with the use of a recursive
Butterworth filter33. The significance test for these anomalies is
based on a bootstrap method34, and it is especially designed to
compensate the decrease in the number of degrees of freedom as a result of the use
of low-pass filters. For every grid-point (x,y) and time lag t (here from −18
to +12 months), let be the multi-peak mean
anomaly that we want to test. Each is
assigned to a statistical distribution generated according to a randomization test
of 10001 permutations of local data in (x,y). Let be this sample distribution, with , used to test the significance level of . Values within this distribution are then assigned to a percentile: , …, , …, . The relative position
of within the distribution is then
calculated and a percentile within the distribution is assigned (i.e. ). This procedure is repeated for every
grid-point (x,y) and time lag t, and only values assigned to an extreme percentile
are plotted as statistically significant. Here, only 5% of percentiles (p<0.05)
are considered to be extreme, being those the ones closer to P0 (negative anomalies)
or P100 (positive anomalies). Thus, following this conservative criterion, only 5%
of data in the multi-peak composite evolution are shown as significant. A similar
significance test can be found in other studies35.Screening of climatic variables that might correlate with KD across the different
timescales and the three large epidemics, was performed at interannual timescales
for the following variables: geopotential height fields, zonal winds, meridional
winds and vertical winds, all of them at 1000, 700, 500 i 300 hPa levels and
horizontal winds at the surface, sea level pressures, sea surface temperatures,
precipitation and land-surface temperatures.
Author Contributions
XR took the main role in the design of the study and performed analyses. JBa actively
participated in the design of the study and performed analyses, JBu and DC actively
participated in the design, JBu, MM, YN and RU provided the KD data for the
different locations, ALL authors participated in the discussion of results and XR,
JBa, JBu and DC wrote the manuscript.
Authors: O R Cooper; D D Parrish; A Stohl; M Trainer; P Nédélec; V Thouret; J P Cammas; S J Oltmans; B J Johnson; D Tarasick; T Leblanc; I S McDermid; D Jaffe; R Gao; J Stith; T Ryerson; K Aikin; T Campos; A Weinheimer; M A Avery Journal: Nature Date: 2010-01-21 Impact factor: 49.962
Authors: Anne H Rowley; Susan C Baker; Stanford T Shulman; Kenneth H Rand; Maria S Tretiakova; Elizabeth J Perlman; Francesca L Garcia; Nuzhath F Tajuddin; Linda M Fox; Julia H Huang; J Carter Ralphe; Kei Takahashi; Jared Flatow; Simon Lin; Mitra B Kalelkar; Benjamin Soriano; Jan M Orenstein Journal: J Infect Dis Date: 2011-04-01 Impact factor: 5.226
Authors: Leyre Riancho-Zarrabeitia; Domingo F Rasilla; Dominic Royé; Pablo Fdez-Arroyabe; Ana Santurtún Journal: Rheumatol Int Date: 2018-05-30 Impact factor: 2.631
Authors: Trenton J Dawson; Cindy T Vuong; Shani C Y Ma; Chad R Russell; Marian E Melish; Andras Bratincsak Journal: Hawaii J Health Soc Welf Date: 2020-05-01
Authors: Xavier Rodó; Roger Curcoll; Marguerite Robinson; Joan Ballester; Jane C Burns; Daniel R Cayan; W Ian Lipkin; Brent L Williams; Mara Couto-Rodriguez; Yosikazu Nakamura; Ritei Uehara; Hiroshi Tanimoto; Josep-Anton Morguí Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2014-05-19 Impact factor: 11.205