We report inelastic neutron scattering experiments on single crystals of superconducting Ba(0.67)K(0.33)Fe(2)As(2) (T(c) = 38 K). In addition to confirming the resonance previously found in powder samples, we find that spin excitations in the normal state form longitudinally elongated ellipses along the Q(AFM) direction in momentum space, consistent with density functional theory predictions. On cooling below T(c), while the resonance preserves its momentum anisotropy as expected, spin excitations at energies below the resonance become essentially isotropic in the in-plane momentum space and dramatically increase their correlation length. These results suggest that the superconducting gap structures in Ba(0.67)Ka(0.33)Fe(2)As(2) are more complicated than those suggested from angle resolved photoemission experiments.
We report inelastic neutron scattering experiments on single crystals of superconducting Ba(0.67)K(0.33)Fe(2)As(2) (T(c) = 38 K). In addition to confirming the resonance previously found in powder samples, we find that spin excitations in the normal state form longitudinally elongated ellipses along the Q(AFM) direction in momentum space, consistent with density functional theory predictions. On cooling below T(c), while the resonance preserves its momentum anisotropy as expected, spin excitations at energies below the resonance become essentially isotropic in the in-plane momentum space and dramatically increase their correlation length. These results suggest that the superconducting gap structures in Ba(0.67)Ka(0.33)Fe(2)As(2) are more complicated than those suggested from angle resolved photoemission experiments.
High-temperature (high-T) superconductivity in iron arsenides arises
from electron or hole doping of their antiferromagnetic (AF) parent compounds12345. The electron pairing, as well as the long range AF order,
can arise from either quasiparticle excitations between the nested hole and electron
Fermi surfaces67891011, or local magnetic moments1213141516. In the itinerant picture, the superconducting pairing
causes the opening of sign-reversed (s± wave) gaps in the
respective hole and electron Fermi surfaces, as evidenced by a strong neutron spin
resonance below T171819202122232425.
The observation of an in-plane momentum dependence of the resonance, with lengthened
direction transverse to the AF wave vector QAFM (Figs.
1a and 1b), in single crystals of electron-doped
BaFe2−(Co,Ni)As2
superconductors232425suggests a fully gapped
s± state26, but the predicted momentum
anisotropy of the spin excitations in optimally hole-doped materials has not been
observed23. Here we report inelastic neutron scattering experiments
on single crystals of superconducting
Ba0.67Ka0.33Fe2As2 (T
= 38 K). In addition to confirming the resonance19, we find that
spin excitations in the normal state form longitudinally elongated ellipses that are
rotated 90° to be along the QAFM direction in momentum space,
consistent with the density functional theory (DFT) prediction23. On
cooling below T, the resonance preserves its moment anisotropy as
expected2326, but the spin excitations for energies below the
resonance unexpectedly become essentially isotropic in the in-plane momentum space and
dramatically increase their correlation length. These results suggest that the
superconducting gap structures in
Ba0.67Ka0.33Fe2As2 are more complicated
than those suggested from angle resolved photoemission experiments11.
Figure 1
Schematic diagram of the reciprocal space probed, transport, and neutron
scattering data on
Ba0.67K0.33Fe2As2.
(a) Real and reciprocal space of the FeAs plane. The light and dark As atoms
indicate As positions below and above the Fe-planes, respectively. (b) Fermi
surfaces at k = 0 calculated using the tight-binding
model of Graser et al.42 for electron and hole-doped
BaFe2As2. The different colors indicate orbital
weights around the Fermi surface with red = d, green =
d, and blue = d. (c)
Temperature dependence of the in-plane resistivity ρ(T)
shows the onset of superconductivity at T = 38 K.
We find no resistivity anomaly that might be associated with structural or
AF phase transitions above T. The inset shows the
temperature dependence of the bulk susceptibility for a 1 mT in-plane
magnetic field giving T = 38 K. (d) Elastic
neutron scattering along the (H, 0, L) direction with fixed
values of L = 0, 2, and 3 at 2 K, demonstrating that there is
no static AF order in our samples. (e) Energy scans at the AF signal
[Q = (1,0,0)] and background [Q =
(1.3,0,0)] positions from 0.5 to 8.5 meV at 45 K and
2 K. (f) χ”(Q,ω), obtained by subtracting the
background and removing the Bose population factor, clearly shows that a
spin gap opens below E∼5.5 meV at 2 K. (g) Energy
scans at Q = (1,0,1) and background Q = (1.3,0,1) positions
from 0.5 to 8.5 meV at 45 K and 2 K. (h)
χ”(Q,ω), obtained using the identical method as
in (f), shows quite different behavior from the results in (f). Solid lines
are guides to the eye. Data in (d) are from HB-3, and those in (e–h)
are from cold triple-axis SPINS. The error bars indicate one sigma
throughout the paper.
Soon after the discovery of high-T superconductivity in iron
arsenides, band structure calculations predicted the presence of two hole-type
cylindrical Fermi surfaces around the zone center (Γ point) and electron-type
Fermi surfaces near zone corners (the M points, Fig.
1b)67. The unconventional electron pairing in these
materials can arise from either a repulsive magnetic interaction between the hole and
electron Fermi surfaces6789 or local AF moment exchange
couplings101214, both of which necessitate a sign change in their
superconducting order parameters. In the simplest picture of this so-called
“s-symmetry” pairing state, nodeless
superconducting gaps open everywhere on the hole and electron Fermi surfaces below
T. One of the most dramatic consequences of such a state is
the presence of a neutron spin resonance in the superconducting state, which occurs at
the AF ordering wave vector QAFM with an energy at (or slightly less
than) the addition of hole and electron superconducting gap energies (), and a clean spin gap below the resonance1718. The intensity gain of the resonance below T is
compensated by the opening of the spin gap at energies below the resonance. The observed
transverse momentum anisotropy of spin excitations in the electron-doped materials232425 favors a fully gapped s-symmetry
superconductivity due to enhancement of the intraorbital, but interband, pair scattering
process26 (see also Fig. 1b and supplementary information).
Results
In the initial neutron scattering experiments on powder samples of hole-doped
Ba0.6K0.4Fe2As2
(T = 38 K), a neutron spin resonance near
14 meV was identified19. While the mode occurred near the
magnitude of the AF wave vector QAFM as expected, the powder
nature of the experiment meant one could not obtain detailed information on the
energy and wave vector dependence of the excitations19, and therefore
could not test the DFT prediction that the in-plane anisotropic momentum dependence
of the spin excitations in hole-doped
Ba0.6K0.4Fe2As2 should be rotated 90
degrees from that of the electron-doped materials (Fig.
1b)23. Since spin excitations can directly probe the
nature the superconducting gap symmetry and phase information182326, a determination of the electron-hole asymmetry in the spin dynamics of
iron-arsenide superconductors is particularly crucial in view of the conflicting
reports concerning the pairing symmetries by angle resolved photoemission
spectroscopy (ARPES)112728, penetration depth29,
and thermo-conductivity meassurements303132. Surprisingly, we
find that the spin excitations at energies below the resonance in
Ba0.67K0.33Fe2As2
(T = 38 K, Fig. 1c) have
strong sinusoidal c-axis modulations around q =
2πL/c (L = 1,3,…Fig. 1a and
Fig. 2g), similar to their undoped parent compounds33, and display clean spin gaps in the superconducting state only for
energies below ∼0.75 meV (Figs. 1e–1h and
Fig. 2a–d). Furthermore, we discovered that the
in-plane momentum dependence of the spin excitations in the normal state of
Ba0.67K0.33Fe2As2 is elongated along
the QAFM direction (Figs. 4b and 4d), thus confirming the DFT
prediction23. Although superconductivity does not change the
momentum anisotropy of the resonance as expected2326 (Fig. 3 and Fig. 4c), the spin excitations
at energies below the resonance dramatically increase the correlation length along
the QAFM direction and become essentially isotropic below
T (Fig. 2 and Fig. 4). Our work is
not consistent with the large three-dimensional superconducting electronic gaps
observed by ARPES112728. On the other hand, given the strong gap
variation over the Fermi surfaces2728, one might imagine that the
low-energy spin excitations arise from weak nodes or small gaps not directly seen by
ARPES.
Figure 2
Wave-vector and temperature dependence of the scattering at excitation
energies below the neutron spin resonance energy in
Ba0.67K0.33Fe2As2.
(a), (b) Q-scans at E = 5 meV along the (H,0,0)
and (H,0,1) directions above and below T. While
the scattering centered at (1,0,0) clearly vanishes below
T, at (1,0,1) it persists and sharpens. (d)
Q-scans at E = 1.5 meV along the (H,0,1)
direction at 2 K and 45 K. The normal state peak at
45 K clearly survives superconductivity at 2 K. (c) Similar
scans at E = 0.75 meV, where the normal state peak clearly
disappears at 2 K, indicating the presence of a 0.75 meV spin
gap. (e) Temperature dependence of the E = 3 meV scattering at
the signal [Q = (1,0,0)] and background [Q =
(1.3,0,0)] positions. The signal shows a clear suppression below
T, while the background scattering goes smoothly
across T. At low temperature, the signal merges into the
background scattering, thus confirming the vanishing magnetic scattering.
(f) Similar data at QAFM = (1,0,1) and Q =
(1.4,0,1). While the signal also responds to T, the
background scattering does not merge into the signal at low-temperature,
thus indicating the continued presence of magnetic scattering. (g) Overall
scattering in the (H,0,L) plane at E = 5 meV and
2 K. The data show a clear sinusoidal modulation along the
L-direction. Data in (a,b,d) are from SPINS, (c) from MACS, (e) from
BT-7, (f) from HB-3, and (g) from MACS. The horizontal bars indicate
instrumental resolutions. The slight off-centering in peak positions for
different experiments from the expected QAFM = (1,0,1)
position is due to small sample mis-alignment problems. The scattering at
(0.6,0,L) with L = 0,2.5 is of phonon or spurious
origin.
Figure 3
Energy and wave vector scans, and temperature dependence of the neutron
spin resonance in
Ba0.67K0.33Fe2As2.
(a) Energy scans from 2 to 19 meV at the signal [Q =
(1,0,2)] and from 2 to 17 meV at the background [Q =
(1.4,0,2)] positions above and below T. The
background scattering has some temperature dependence below about
11 meV, probably due to the presence of phonons. This, however, does
not affect the temperature dependence below 60 K. (b)
χ”(Q,ω) at Q = (1,0,2) across
T. (c) Constant-energy scans at E =
15 meV at 45 K and 2 K. The scattering shows a well
centered peak at Q = (1,0,2) that increases dramatically below
T, thus confirming that the mode is centered at
commensurate positions. (d) The corresponding χ”(Q,ω)
at Q = (1,0,2). (e) Comparison of the temperature difference
(2 K minus 45 K) spectra for the neutron spin resonance at
Q = (1,0,2) and (1,0,3). The resonance energy is weakly
L-dependent. (f) Temperature dependence of the scattering at the
resonance energy E = 15 meV and Q = (1,0,2). The
scattering shows a clear order-parameter-like increase below
T. Data in (a–f) are from HB-3. The
horizontal bar indicates instrumental resolution.
Figure 4
The in-plane wave-vector profile of the spin excitations and temperature
dependence of the scattering at energies below and near the
resonance.
(a) The in-plane (H,K) magnetic scattering integrated from
5 meV to 10 meV at 5 K. The data were collected on the
ARCS spectrometer with incident beam energy E =
25 meV, c-axis along the incident beam direction. (b)
Identical scan at 45 K. In both cases, the L-integration range
is from 1.2
Figure 1c shows the transport and magnetic properties of our
single crystals of Ba0.67K0.33Fe2As2
which indicate T = 38 K. Our samples were grown by
using the self-flux method similar to an earlier report34. In
previous neutron scattering and muon-spin-relaxation measurements on Sn flux grown
Ba1−KFe2As2
single crystals3536, static AF order was found to phase separate
from the superconducting phase due to K-chemical inhomogeneity. We have carried out
systematic inductively coupled plasma atomic-emission spectroscopy analysis on our
samples (size up to 15 mm*10 mm*1 mm) to confirm their chemical
composition. Although our analysis also showed that K-concentrations vary slightly
(up to 3%) for different batches, the superconducting properties near optimal
K-doping are insensitive to such concentration variations and these samples have no
static AF order coexisting with superconductivity at 2 K as shown by the
neutron diffraction measurements in Fig. 1d. Independent
nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) measurements on these samples (W. P. Halperin,
private communication) also confirmed the absence of the static AF order at
4 K and showed that the local magnetic field distribution as determined by
the NMR linewidth is much narrower than that of the earlier K-doped
BaFe2As2 samples37.To determine the energy dependence of the imaginary part of the dynamic spin
susceptibility χ”(Q,ω), we measured energy scans at the
QAFM = (1,0,0) and (1,0,1) which correspond to spin
excitations at AF wave vector transfers purely in the plane (L = 0) and
L = 1, respectively (Fig. 1a), in the orthorhombic
notation suitable for the parent compounds2133. Figures 1e and1g show the raw data measured on the cold neutron
triple-axis spectrometer above and below T. The corresponding
dynamic spin susceptibilities, χ”(Q,ω), obtained by
subtracting the background and correcting the Bose population factors (Figs. 1e and 1g), are shown in Figs. 1f and
1h for Q = (1,0,0) and (1,0,1), respectively. In the normal state
(T = 45 K), χ”(Q,ω) at both wave vectors
increases linearly with increasing energy. On cooling the system to T =
2 K (well below T), a spin gap opens to E =
5 meV at Q = (1,0,0), while little change of the magnetic scattering
occurs at Q = (1,0,1).To confirm this conclusion, we carried out constant-energy scans at E =
5 meV and E = 1.5 meV. Figures 2a and 2b
show the raw data at E = 5 meV across Q = (Η,0,0)
and (Η,0,1), respectively. The normal state scattering shows broad peaks
centered at Q = (1,0,L) with L = 0, 1. To estimate the in-plane
spin-spin correlation lengths ξ, we fit the scattering profile with a Gaussian
on a linear background using , where the full
width at half maximum in
Å−1. Fourier transforms of the Gaussian peak in
reciprocal space give normal state in-plane spin-spin correlation lengths of and 23±4 Å for L
= 0 and 1, respectively38. Upon entering into the superconducting
state, the magnetic scattering vanishes for L = 0, while the spin correlation
length for L = 1 increases to 52±5 Å (Fig.
2b). These results are consistent with Figs.
1e–1h, and confirm that the low-temperature spin gaps are strongly
L-dependent. Similar L-dependence of the spin gaps have also been
found in electron-doped materials212223. Therefore, while
superconductivity suppresses the dynamic susceptibility at L = 0, it
dramatically increases the in-plane spin correlation length and slightly enhances
χ”(Q,ω) at L = 1. To see what happens at lower
energies, we show in Figs. 2c and 2d constant-energy scans at
E = 0.75, and 1.5 meV along the (Η,0,1) direction
above and below T, respectively. While a clean spin gap is found
at E = 0.75 meV in the superconducting state (Fig.
2c), there is clear magnetic scattering at E = 1.5 meV
below T (Fig. 2d).If the opening of a spin gap as shown in Figs. 1 and 2a–d is associated with superconductivity, one should
expect a dramatic reduction in magnetic scattering below T. Figure 2e shows the temperature dependence of the E =
3 meV scattering at the L = 0 signal [Q = (1,0,0)]
and background [Q = (1.3,0,0)] positions. While the signal scattering
shows a clear suppression below T indicating the opening of a
spin gap, the background scattering has no anomaly across T and
merges into the signal below 15 K. The vanishing magnetic scattering at
Q = (1,0,0) below T is confirmed by Q-scans
along the (H,0,0) directions (see supplementary
information). At Q = (1,0,1) and E = 3 meV, the
temperature dependence of the scattering again shows a clear suppression below
T (Fig. 2f), but in this case the
background scattering at Q = (1.4,0,1) does not merge into the signal at
4 K. This is consistent with the constant-energy scans along the
(H,0,1) directions (see supplementary information). While
the scattering shows a clear peak centered at Q = (1,0,1) in the normal
state, the identical scan in the superconducting state also has a peak that becomes
narrower in width, indicating that the spin-spin correlation length at this energy
nearly doubles from 23±3 Å at 45 K to
40±7 Å at 2 K.Figure 2g shows the scattering profile in the
[H,0,L] scattering plane at E = 5 meV and
T = 2 K. The magnetic signal displays a clear sinusoidal
modulation along the (1,0,L) direction with maximum intensity at odd L
and no intensity at even L. At E = 3 meV, the normal state spin
excitations also exhibit a sinusoidal modulation along the c-axis, while the
effect of superconductivity is to open spin gaps near the even L
positions.Having established the behavior of the low energy spin dynamics across
T, we now turn to the neutron spin resonance19 above the spin gap energy. In previous work on single crystals of
electron-doped superconducting
BaFe2–(Co,Ni)As2 (refs.
20–25), the neutron spin resonance was found
to be dispersive along the c-axis and occurred at significantly different
energies for L = 0, and 1 (ΔE ∼ 1–2 meV, refs.
21,23). Furthermore,
the spin excitations display larger broadening along the transverse direction with
respect to QAFM in momentum space without changing the spin-spin
correlation lengths across T (refs. 23–25). To confirm the resonance in the previous powder
measurements19 and determine its dispersion along the
c-axis for hole-doped
Ba0.67K0.33Fe2As2, we carried out
systematic energy scans above and below T. Figure
3a shows the outcome at the signal [Q = (1, 0, 2)] and
background [Q = (1.4, 0, 2)] positions for T = 45 K
and 2 K. Figure 3b plots χ”(Q,ω)
at Q = (1, 0, 2) across T. Inspection of Figs. 3a and 3b reveals that the effect of superconductivity is to
suppress the low energy spin excitations and create a neutron spin resonance near
15 meV consistent with earlier work19. To test the dispersion
of the resonance, we have also carried out similar measurements at Q =
(1,0,3). Figure 3e compares the temperature difference plots
for Q = (1,0,2) and Q = (1,0,3), which reveals little dispersion for
the neutron spin resonance in
Ba0.67K0.33Fe2As2. This is clearly
different from that of electron-doped pnictides2123. Figure 3f shows the temperature dependence of the scattering at Q
= (1,0,2) and E = 15 meV. Consistent with earlier work19, we find that the intensity of the resonance increases below T
like a superconducting order parameter. Figure 3c shows
constant-energy scans at E = 15 meV along the (H,0,2) direction
above and below T, and Figure 3d plots the
temperature dependence of χ”(Q,ω). These data indicate that
the effect of superconductivity is to enhance the scattering at the AF wave vector
without significantly changing the spin-spin correlation length.Finally, to determine the in-plane wave-vector dependence of the spin excitations for
Ba0.67K0.33Fe2As2, we carried out
neutron time-of-flight measurements imaging the in-plane spin excitations at
energies below (Figs. 4a and 4b) and at the resonance (Figs. 4c and 4d). In the normal state, the spin excitations
exhibit anisotropy along the QAFM direction (Figs.
4b and 4d) precisely as predicted by the DFT calculation for hole-doped
materials23. Our calculations suggest that the longitudinal
elongation in spin excitations arises from intra-orbital, inter-band scattering from
d orbitals between the hole- and electron- pockets
(Fig. 1b and supplementary
information). In the electron-doped case, the main contribution to the spin
susceptibility for Q near QAFM = (1,0) comes from
scattering processes between the blue d orbitals indicated by
arrows, i.e., between the upper electron pocket and hole pocket around (1,1) in
Fig. 1b. Since the (1,1) hole pocket is quite small in the
electron doped case, the nesting wave vector is offset from QAFM =
(1,0) by a finite ΔQ, which leads to the incommensurate peaks
along the direction from (1,0) to (1,1), i.e., along the transverse direction. In
the hole-doped case, d to d scattering is
still strong, but now there is also a large contribution from scattering between the
d orbitals which gives rise to the incommensurate peaks
along the Q direction and therefore the longitudinal anisotropy.
The main scattering processes are again indicated by the arrows and occur between
well-nested (green) regions on the outer hole pocket around Γ, and the electron
pocket around (1,0). Since the hole pocket is much larger than the electron pocket,
the nesting wave-vector is offset by a finite ΔQ from
QAFM = (1,0) which leads to the longitudinal anisotropy (see
supplementary information for detailed calculations).On cooling below T, the resonance exhibits an anisotropy profile
that is the same as the spin excitations in the normal state (Figs.
4c and 4d), while the anisotropic scattering (Fig.
4b) found in the normal state for energies below the resonance becomes
isotropic (Fig. 4a). To test if the changing scattering
profile for energies below the resonance is indeed associated with
superconductivity, we carried out detailed temperature-dependent wave-vector
measurements along the Q = [H, 0, L] (L = 1)
direction at E = 4, 6 meV, below and above, respectively, the spin gap
of 5 meV (Fig. 1f). Figures 4e and
4g show constant-energy scans above and below T, which
confirm earlier measurements at E = 1.5, 3, 5 meV (Fig.
2 and supplementary information). By fitting the
profile with a Gaussian on a linear background, we can extract the FWHM of the
scattering profile at different temperatures (see supplementary
information). Figures 4f and 4h show the temperature
dependence of the FWHM for E = 4 and 6 meV, respectively. In both
cases, there is a dramatic drop in the FWHM and a corresponding increase in the
spin-spin correlation length below T. Therefore, the effect of
superconductivity is to induce a resonance and change the shape of the wave-vector
dependent magnetic scattering from anisotropic to isotropic for excitation energies
below the resonance.
Discussion
The novel spin excitations in hole-doped
Ba0.67K0.33Fe2As2 we have discovered
differ from the typical resonance behavior in electron-doped materials202122232425 in two important ways. First, the development of
superconductivity dramatically sharpens the spin excitations for energies below the
resonance and changes their dispersion from anisotropic above T
to isotropic in momentum space below T. Second, the normal spin
excitations in hole-doped materials have a momentum anisotropy that is rotated 90
degrees from that of the electron-doped pnictides232425. The
observed elongated scattering along the longitudinal QAFM
direction for hole-doped superconducting
Ba0.67K0.33Fe2As2 is consistent with
the fact that incommensurate spin excitations are observed in the longitudinal
direction in pure KFe2As2 (ref. 39).In principle, spin excitations in a paramagnetic superconducting material can stem
from itinerant electrons, local spin moments, or a combination of both, and can
directly probe the superconducting gap symmetry1718. Since there is
heavy debate on whether the magnetism in iron pnictides arises from itinerant or
localized electrons6789104041, we will not address this
issue here but instead focus on what the temperature dependence of the spin
excitations tells us about the superconducting gap structures in hole-doped
materials.From the Fermi surface nesting picture, recent DFT calculations23 have
successfully predicted that the oval shape of the normal state spin excitations in
the electron-doped pnictides should rotate by 90 degrees in the hole-doped
materials. This prediction can be understood from a detailed comparison of the Fermi
surfaces in electron and hole doped materials (Fig. 1b), and
is consistent with our observations (Figs. 4b and 4d). In the
simplest s±-symmetry electron pairing model1718, the opening of isotropic s-wave superconducting gaps in
the hole and electron Fermi surfaces should suppress any low-energy spin excitations
below the resonance. The observation of nearly zero-energy spin excitations at
2 K (E > 0.75 meV) and QAFM = (1, 0,
L = odd) demonstrates that the superconducting gaps must be very small on
some parts of the Fermi surfaces. These also must be linked by
QAFM = (1, 0, 1) and simultaneously be present on the hole and
electron Fermi surfaces with sufficient phase space to account for the observed
low-energy spin excitations (Figs. 1–4). The dramatic increase in the spin-spin correlation length below
T reveals that the low-energy spin excitations are also
strongly affected by the opening of superconducting gaps on other parts of the Fermi
surfaces. In principle, the opening of large superconducting gaps on these Fermi
surfaces may reduce the scattering between the two different parts of the Fermi
surfaces, which can increase the lifetime and hence the spin-spin correlation length
as observed in our experiments.However, such a pure itinerant picture is inconsistent with angle resolved
photoemission experiments, where the three-dimensional superconducting gaps are
large in all of the observed Fermi surfaces with a minimum gap energy of
4 meV (refs. 11,27,28), a value much larger than the
observed spin excitations at L = 1. Therefore, the only way to understand the
observed low-energy spin excitations near L = 1 in the itinerant picture is
to assume that there are significant parts of the Fermi surface (Fermi arcs), yet to
be observed by photoemission experiments112728, that are
essentially gapless. In this case, further calculations below Tc
using a random phase approximation (RPA) and the three-dimensional five-orbital
tight-binding model42 are needed to see what kind of gap structure is
consistent with the observed change in the spin excitation linewidth. Therefore,
while our results clearly indicate that the superconducting gap structures in
Ba0.67K0.33Fe2As2 are more
complicated than those suggested by the current ARPES measurements112728, further theoretical work is necessary to understand the
temperature dependence of the spin excitations.
Methods
Single crystals of Ba0.67K0.33Fe2As2 were
grown by the self-flux method43. The resistivity and magnetic
susceptibility were measured by PPMS and SQUID from Quantum design. A 6.12 mg
crystal cut from a big piece used for neutron scattering shows 100% superconducting
volume fraction, see the inset in Fig.1c. Many others from different batches show
very similar properties. The position in reciprocal space at wave vector
= (q, q,
q) Å−1 is labeled as (H,
K, L) = (q
a/2π, q
b/2π, q
c/2π) reciprocal lattice units (rlu), where the tetragonal unit cell of
Ba0.67K0.33Fe2As2 has been labeled
in orthorhombic notation with lattice parameters of a = b =
5.56 Å, c = 13.29 Å (ref. 33). Our neutron scattering experiments were carried out on the HB-3
thermal neutron three-axis spectrometer at High Flux Isotope Reactor and the ARCS
time-of-flight chopper spectrometers at Spallation Neutron Source, Oak Ridge
National Laboratory, and on the BT-7 thermal, SPINS and MACS cold neutron
triple-axis spectrometers, at the NIST Center for Neutron Research. For the HB-3,
BT-7, SPINS, MACS neutron measurements, we fixed the final neutron energies at
E = 14.7 meV, 13.5 meV, 5.0 meV, and
5.0 meV, respectively. For triple-axis measurements, we co-aligned 4.5 grams
of single crystals on aluminum plates. For time-of-flight measurements on ARCS, we
co-aligned 60 pieces of single crystals with a total weight of 20 grams on several
aluminum plates. In both cases, the in-plane and c-axis mosaics of aligned
crystal assemblies are about 3° and 6.5°, respectively.
Author Contributions
P.D. and C.L.Z. planned the experiments. C.L.Z and M.W. grew single crystals at UTK.
C.L.Z. carried out thermal and cold triple-axis spectrometer measurements on HB-3,
SPINS, and BT-7 with help from M.Y.W., J.Z., K.M., M.D.L., S.X.C., S.C, and J.W.L.
M.W. carried out MACS and ARCS measurements with help from H.Q.L., M.S.L.,D.L.A.,
and J.A.R. T.A.M. carried out RPA calculations. T.A.M., T.X., and J.P.H. helped with
theoretical interpretations. The paper was written by P.D., J.P.H, T.A.M. with input
from all co-authors.
Authors: J K Dong; S Y Zhou; T Y Guan; H Zhang; Y F Dai; X Qiu; X F Wang; Y He; X H Chen; S Y Li Journal: Phys Rev Lett Date: 2010-02-26 Impact factor: 9.161
Authors: Y Zhang; L X Yang; F Chen; B Zhou; X F Wang; X H Chen; M Arita; K Shimada; H Namatame; M Taniguchi; J P Hu; B P Xie; D L Feng Journal: Phys Rev Lett Date: 2010-09-08 Impact factor: 9.161
Authors: C H Lee; K Kihou; H Kawano-Furukawa; T Saito; A Iyo; H Eisaki; H Fukazawa; Y Kohori; K Suzuki; H Usui; K Kuroki; K Yamada Journal: Phys Rev Lett Date: 2011-02-11 Impact factor: 9.161
Authors: Clarina de la Cruz; Q Huang; J W Lynn; Jiying Li; W Ratcliff; J L Zarestky; H A Mook; G F Chen; J L Luo; N L Wang; Pengcheng Dai Journal: Nature Date: 2008-05-28 Impact factor: 49.962
Authors: E C Blomberg; M A Tanatar; R M Fernandes; I I Mazin; Bing Shen; Hai-Hu Wen; M D Johannes; J Schmalian; R Prozorov Journal: Nat Commun Date: 2013 Impact factor: 14.919
Authors: Meng Wang; Chenglin Zhang; Xingye Lu; Guotai Tan; Huiqian Luo; Yu Song; Miaoyin Wang; Xiaotian Zhang; E A Goremychkin; T G Perring; T A Maier; Zhiping Yin; Kristjan Haule; Gabriel Kotliar; Pengcheng Dai Journal: Nat Commun Date: 2013 Impact factor: 14.919
Authors: C H Lee; K Kihou; J T Park; K Horigane; K Fujita; F Waßer; N Qureshi; Y Sidis; J Akimitsu; M Braden Journal: Sci Rep Date: 2016-03-23 Impact factor: 4.379