Literature DB >> 22355462

Current status of the National Cancer Screening Program for cervical cancer in Korea, 2009.

Young Hwa Lee1, Kui Son Choi, Hoo-Yeon Lee, Jae Kwan Jun.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The National Cancer Screening Program (NCSP) began in 1999. In this report, we evaluate the results of the NCSP for cervical cancer in 2009 and provide participation rates in an organized cervical cancer screening program in Korea.
METHODS: Using data obtained from the National Cancer Screening Information System, cervical cancer screening participation rates were calculated. Recall rates, defined as the proportion of abnormal cases among women screened, were also estimated with 95% confidence intervals.
RESULTS: The target population of cervical cancer screening in 2009 included 4,577,200 Korean women aged 30 and over, 1,349,668 of whom underwent the Papanicolaou smear test (29.5% participation rate). Compared with the participation rate of women covered by the National Health Insurance Program (31.3%), the participation rate of women covered by the Medical Aid Program was lower (18.4%). Participation rates also varied in different age groups (the highest of 39.3% in women aged 50 to 59 and the lowest of 14.4% in those aged 70 and older), and different areas (the highest of 34.1% in Busan and the lowest of 21.5% in Chungnam). The overall recall rate for cervical cancer screening was 0.41% (95% confidence interval, 0.40 to 0.42).
CONCLUSION: According to our study, efforts to facilitate participation and reduce disparities in cervical cancer screening among Korean women are needed.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Age distribution; Health insurance; Korea; Mass screening; Uterine cervical neoplasms

Year:  2012        PMID: 22355462      PMCID: PMC3280061          DOI: 10.3802/jgo.2012.23.1.16

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Gynecol Oncol        ISSN: 2005-0380            Impact factor:   4.401


INTRODUCTION

Cervical cancer is one of the most common causes of cancer death among women worldwide, despite implementation of the Papanicolaou (Pap) smear test, which has dramatically decreased the incidence of cervical cancer in developed nations over the past 30 years [1]. Cervical cancer incidence and mortality have been decreasing continuously in Korea. However, cervical cancer remains a clinically important disease; in fact, it is the sixth most common cancer among women and first among female genital malignancies. Thus, it is a major health problem for Korean women. Indeed, in 2008, an estimated 3,888 new cases were diagnosed, accounting for 4.5% of new female cancer cases. The incidence rate per 100,000 women was 11.2 in 2008, down from a high of 16.3 in 1999. Survival rates have also improved [2]. Since population-based cervical cancer screening was introduced, cervical cancer screening, including opportunistic as well as organized screening, has been widely available [3,4]. Currently, two population-based organized cancer screening programs exist in Korea: the National Cancer Screening Program (NCSP), whose target population includes Medical Aid Program (MAP) recipients and the lower 50% of National Health Insurance (NHI) beneficiaries, and the NHI Cancer Screening Program (NHICSP), which is provided to the upper 50% of NHI beneficiaries by NHI Corporation. These two programs provide a screening test free of charge to all Korean women aged 30 and over, biennially [5]. In the present study, we sought to provide preliminary information on the NCSP for cervical cancer, based on data collected in 2009. This report describes participation rates and the percentage of abnormalities by age and insurance type. Results for the NHICSP will be reported by the NHI Corporation.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

1. Study population

In this study, we utilized the database of the 2009 NCSP for cervical cancer. Korean women are instructed to be screened biennially, and the standard modality for cervical cancer screening is the Pap smear test. The target population for cervical cancer screening in the 2009 NCSP consisted of 4,577,200 women born in 1979 or earlier (i.e., aged 30 years and older, with a mean age of 51.9±11.0 years) who were MAP recipients or NHI beneficiaries in the lower 50% of the income bracket. For those NHI beneficiaries who were included in the NCSP, the insurance premium was US$ 60 (1 USD=1,000 KWR) or less per month for employees and US$ 72 or less per month for the self-employed (based on November, 2008). Participation in the NCSP was confirmed based on claims and cervical cancer screening results submitted to the NHI Corporation before December 31, 2009. All screening was done between January 1, 2009, and December 31, 2009. Some subjects underwent the same screening procedure multiple times; for those individuals, only the first screen was counted (n=11,465). These participants were only counted once in determining the participation rate.

2. Variables

The NCSP for cervical cancer reported Pap test results by using the 2001 Bethesda System categories [6]. The screening results were assigned to one of the following categories: normal, infection/reaction, atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance (ASCUS), low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (LSIL), high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (HSIL), squamous cell carcinoma, and "other". The category "other" included Pap smear results relating only to glandular elements of the genital tract and hormonal evaluations. Pap smear results were defined as abnormal if they were reported as LSIL, HSIL, adenocarcinoma in situ (AIS), or squamous or adenomatous cell carcinoma [7].

3. Statistical analysis

The participation rate of cervical cancer screening was calculated by dividing the number of participants by the target population of the NCSP for cervical cancer, and is denoted as a percentage. Recall rates for cervical cancer screening were defined as the proportion of abnormal cases among the cancer-screened participants; 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated for all recall rates. SAS ver. 9.1 (SAS Institute, Cary, NC, USA) was used in all statistical analyses.

RESULTS

Table 1 shows the screening outcomes by age, health insurance type, and area of residence. The target population of the 2009 NCSP for cervical cancer screening included 4,577,200 females; among them, 1,349,668 underwent the Pap smear test, giving a participation rate of 29.5%. In terms of age, the participation rate was highest (39.3%) among females aged 50 to 59 years and the lowest (14.4%) among those aged 70 years and older. Regionnally, while the participation rate was the highest (34.1%) in Busan, which is the second largest city in Korea, it was the lowest (21.5%) in Chungnam, which is a rural area.
Table 1

Screening outcomes by age, health insurance type, and area of residence from the National Cancer Screening Program for cervical cancer, 2009

CI, confidence interval; NHI, National Health Insurance; MAP, Medical Aid Program.

*Includes low-grade intraepithelial lesions, high-grade intraepithelial lesions, adenocarcinoma in situ, and squamous or adenomatous cell cancer.

Recall rates in women aged 70 years and older and in their 30s, in contrast to the participation rates, were higher than those in the other age groups. Among the age groups, the range of recall rates for women in the NHI program was 0.31-0.51%; however, for those who were MAP recipients, the range was 0.30-0.68%, making the recall rate of women aged 70 years and older and in their 30s twice that of women in their 50s. Except for women in their 50s, in each age group the recall rate for women who were MAP recipients was higher than that for women who were NHI beneficiaries (Table 1). The number of participants among NHI beneficiaries decreased with age, whereas the number of participants who were MAP recipients did not change with age (Fig. 1). The overall participation rate of NHI beneficiaries was higher than that of MAP recipients (31.3 and 18.4%, respectively). Additionally, the participation rate of NHI beneficiaries compared with MAP recipients was higher for all age groups (Fig. 2). The participation rates in women aged 70 years and older and in their 30s were lower than those for the other age groups. The same was true for women who were NHI beneficiaries and MAP recipients. Women who were MAP recipients were estimated to have lower participation rates than those in the NHI group for each age group.
Fig. 1

Number of participants by health insurance type and age from the National Cancer Screening Program for cervical cancer, 2009.

Fig. 2

Participation rates by health insurance type and age from the National Cancer Screening Program for cervical cancer, 2009.

Of all participants, 0.41% (5,529) represented abnormal cases. Compared with health insurance beneficiaries, the rate of abnormal cases involving MAP recipients was higher than those involving NHI beneficiaries by 0.12%. Regarding age, the abnormal rate decreased for older women but increased sharply for women aged 70 years and older (Table 2). The U-shaped curve representing abnormal tests by age diverged from 0.48% for women in their 30s, reached a minimum (0.33%) for women in their 60s, and approached 0.56% for women aged 70 years and older (Fig. 3). With increasing age, the proportion of LSILs reported decreased, while the proportions of HSILs and squamous cell carcinoma increased.
Table 2

Distribution of Papanicolaou smear test results by age group and health insurance type in the National Cancer Screening Program for cervical cancer, 2009

Values are presented as number (%).

MAP, Medical Aid Program; NHI, National Health Insurance.

*Individuals without available screening results were excluded (n=11). †Includes low-grade intraepithelial lesions, high-grade intraepithelial lesions, adenocarcinoma in situ, and squamous or adenomatous cell cancer.

Fig. 3

Proportion of abnormal results by age from the National Cancer Screening Program for cervical cancer, 2009. LSIL, low-grade intraepithelial lesions; HSIL, high-grade intraepithelial lesions; SCC, squamous cell cancer.

DISCUSSION

The participation rate in the 2009 NCSP for cervical cancer was 29.5%. Participation rates have tended to increase since the first participation rate for cervical cancer screening in the NCSP was estimated at 15.4% in 2002 [5]. However, the rate remains at a lower level compared with those in countries that have established screening programs, although it is higher than that in Japan which is also located in Asia. Regarding Europe, fourteen countries operate cervical cancer prevention programs, and their participation rates reportedly range from 10 to 79% [8]. Northern European countries that launched a similar program in the 1960s, including Finland, Sweden, and Denmark, report participation rates in excess of 75% [9]. The US has a National Breast and Cervical Cancer Early Detection Program (NBCCEDP), which was adopted in 1991 and which provides low-income, uninsured, and minority women with screening and diagnostic services for breast and cervical cancer; that program's participation rate for cervical cancer screening is 78.3% [10-12]. In 1998, the UK implemented the NHS Cancer Screening Program for women. In that country, the Pap smear test had been used to detect cervical cancer, but the liquid-based cytology method replaced it in 2003. The participation rate for cervical cancer screening in the UK was 78.9% as of March, 2009 [13]. In Japan, local governments instituted a cancer detection program in the 1960s; however, this was replaced by a national cancer detection program run by the central government upon establishment of the Health and Medical Services Law for the Aged. Cervical cancer screening started in 1982, and the participation rate was 18.8% in 2009 [14,15]. For early cancer detection programs, the participation rate is very important because early adoption of detection programs effectively lowers the incidence and mortality rate of cervical cancer, and the incidence rate decreases as an individual repeats the test [16]. In Sweden, which launched its cervical cancer early detection program in 1958, the number of patients in the terminal stage was dramatically reduced, making care for cancer patients more efficient [17]. In the US, women aged 18 years and over participate in cervical cancer screening tests every 3 years using the Pap smear test, and the incidence rate continues to decrease [10]. In Korea, a steady decline in both the incidence and mortality of cervical cancer has been observed; the incidence of cervical cancer decreased by 4.6% annually from 1999 to 2008 [2,18]. The NCSP for cervical cancer has shown a decreased incidence rate of cervical cancer and has had a positive effect on cancer management; however, several problems remain to be addressed. First, although the cervical cancer screening program is free of charge to participants, the participation rate among MAP recipients was 18.4%, which is much lower than that among NHI beneficiaries (31.3%). Moreover, the recall rate of MAP recipients was 0.52%, which is higher than that of NHI beneficiaries (0.40%). Regarding the US, as socioeconomic status is lowered, the incidence rate increases [19], and as the cumulative number of participants undergoing screening increases, the prevalence rate decreases [10]. In Korea, sociodemographic factors such as being married, having a higher education, a rural residence, and private health insurance were significantly associated with higher participation rates of cervical cancer screening. However, household income was not a significant factor. Additionally, the perception of not needing a Pap test due to good health or an absence of symptoms was the most frequently reported barrier to participation in cervical cancer screening [20]. Thus, stronger efforts are required to identify what obstructs MAP recipients from participating in the detection program and to develop proper institutional measures. Second, regarding age, the participation and recall rates of women in their 30s were 17.9 and 0.48%, respectively. This represents the lowest and highest rates, respectively, except for women aged 70 years and older. Considering that the incidence rate among younger women is rising while the overall incidence rate is falling [21,22], women in their 30s must participate in a screening program to prevent cervical cancer. Additionally, the participation and recall rates of women aged 70 years and older were relatively low and high, respectively. Elderly women are said to be vulnerable to cervical cancer because they believe that menopause frees them from diseases involving the reproductive organs; thus, they tend not to participate in prevention programs. The US once limited the age of eligibility for the Pap smear test to 65 years; however, in a consensus statement announced at the National Institutes of Health Consensus Development Conference Statement on Cervical Cancer, women aged 65 and older were encouraged to continuously attend the screening program [23]. This implies that constant care for cervical cancer is needed after menopause, and the extension of average lifespan calls for extending the prevention period. Differences in participation rates were identified according to health insurance type, age, and area of residence. Hence, along with improving the participation rate for cervical cancer screening, continuing efforts are required to minimize these differences. We expect that our results will be useful in creating policies and new studies to improve efforts to prevent cervical cancer in Korea.
  20 in total

1.  Cervical cancer: the increasing incidence of adenocarcinoma and adenosquamous carcinoma in younger women.

Authors:  S Liu; R Semenciw; Y Mao
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2001-04-17       Impact factor: 8.262

2.  Overview of the National Cancer screening programme and the cancer screening status in Korea.

Authors:  Yeonju Kim; Jae Kwan Jun; Kui Sun Choi; Hoo-Yeon Lee; Eun-Cheol Park
Journal:  Asian Pac J Cancer Prev       Date:  2011

3.  Global cancer statistics, 2002.

Authors:  D Max Parkin; Freddie Bray; J Ferlay; Paola Pisani
Journal:  CA Cancer J Clin       Date:  2005 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 508.702

Review 4.  Cancer screening in the United States, 2010: a review of current American Cancer Society guidelines and issues in cancer screening.

Authors:  Robert A Smith; Vilma Cokkinides; Durado Brooks; Debbie Saslow; Otis W Brawley
Journal:  CA Cancer J Clin       Date:  2010 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 508.702

5.  Relationships between socioeconomic status and race-specific cervical cancer incidence in the United States, 1973-1992.

Authors:  T Liu; X Wang; J W Waterbor; H L Weiss; S J Soong
Journal:  J Health Care Poor Underserved       Date:  1998-11

6.  Effectiveness of cervical cancer screening over cervical cancer mortality among Japanese women.

Authors:  Khandoker Aklimunnessa; Mitsuru Mori; M M H Khan; Fumio Sakauchi; Tatsuhiko Kubo; Yoshihisa Fujino; Sadao Suzuki; Shinkan Tokudome; Akiko Tamakoshi; Yutaka Motohashi; Ichiro Tsuji; Yosikazu Nakamura; Hiroyasu Iso; Haruo Mikami; Yutaka Inaba; Yoshiharu Hoshiyama; Hiroshi Suzuki; Hiroyuki Shimizu; Hideaki Toyoshima; Kenji Wakai; Yoshinori Ito; Shuji Hashimoto; Shogo Kikuchi; Akio Koizumi; Takashi Kawamura; Yoshiyuki Watanabe; Tsuneharu Miki; Chigusa Date; Kiyomi Sakata; Takayuki Nose; Norihiko Hayakawa; Takesumi Yoshimura; Akira Shibata; Naoyuki Okamoto; Hideo Shino; Yoshiyuki Ohno; Tomoyuki Kitagawa; Toshio Kuroki; Kazuo Tajima
Journal:  Jpn J Clin Oncol       Date:  2006-07-14       Impact factor: 3.019

7.  Cervical screening in the National Breast and Cervical Cancer Early Detection Program, 1995-2001.

Authors:  Vicki B Benard; Christie R Eheman; Herschel W Lawson; Donald K Blackman; Christa Anderson; William Helsel; Sandra F Thames; Nancy C Lee
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 7.661

8.  The increasing frequency of cervical cancer in Korean women under 35.

Authors:  Chan Hee Han; Hyun Jung Cho; Sung Jong Lee; Jeong Hoon Bae; Seog Nyen Bae; Sung Eun Namkoong; Jong Sup Park
Journal:  Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2008-03-31       Impact factor: 4.679

9.  Cervical cancer in the screening era: who fell victim in spite of successful screening programs?

Authors:  B Folke Pettersson; Kristina Hellman; Roxane Vaziri; Sonia Andersson; Ann-Cathrin Hellström
Journal:  J Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2011-06-30       Impact factor: 4.401

10.  Sociodemographic gradients in breast and cervical cancer screening in Korea: the Korean National Cancer Screening Survey (KNCSS) 2005-2009.

Authors:  Mi Jin Park; Eun-Cheol Park; Kui Son Choi; Jae Kwan Jun; Hoo-Yeon Lee
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2011-06-17       Impact factor: 4.430

View more
  16 in total

1.  Practice guidelines for the early detection of cervical cancer in Korea: Korean Society of Gynecologic Oncology and the Korean Society for Cytopathology 2012 edition.

Authors:  Jae Kwan Lee; Jin Hwa Hong; Sokbom Kang; Dae-Yeon Kim; Byoung-Gie Kim; Sung-Hoon Kim; Yong-Man Kim; Jae-Weon Kim; Jae-Hoon Kim; Tae-Jin Kim; Hyun Jung Kim; Hye Sun Kim; Hee-Sug Ryu; Jae Yun Song; Hyeong Sik Ahn; Chong Woo Yoo; Hye-Kyoung Yoon; Keun-Ho Lee; Ahwon Lee; Yonghee Lee; In Ho Lee; Jeong-Won Lee; Taek Sang Lee; Myong Cheol Lim; Suk-Joon Chang; Hyun Hoon Chung; Woong Ju; Hee Jae Joo; Soo-Young Hur; Sung-Ran Hong; Joo-Hyun Nam
Journal:  J Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2013-04-05       Impact factor: 4.401

2.  Clinical Role of Adjuvant Chemotherapy after Radical Hysterectomy for FIGO Stage IB-IIA Cervical Cancer: Comparison with Adjuvant RT/CCRT Using Inverse-Probability-of-Treatment Weighting.

Authors:  Phill-Seung Jung; Dae-Yeon Kim; Shin-Wha Lee; Jeong-Yeol Park; Dae-Shik Suh; Jong-Hyeok Kim; Yong-Man Kim; Young-Tak Kim; Joo-Hyun Nam
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-07-15       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  Trends in Cervical Cancer Mortality by Socioeconomic Status in Korean Women between 1998 and 2009.

Authors:  Mi-Hyun Kim; Yun-Mi Song; Bo-Kyoung Kim; Sung-Min Park; Gwang Pyo Ko
Journal:  Korean J Fam Med       Date:  2013-07-24

Review 4.  Epidemiologic characteristics of cervical cancer in Korean women.

Authors:  Hyun-Joo Seol; Kyung-Do Ki; Jong-Min Lee
Journal:  J Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2014-01-08       Impact factor: 4.401

5.  Reproductive outcomes after laparoscopic radical trachelectomy for early-stage cervical cancer.

Authors:  Jeong-Yeol Park; Dae-Yeon Kim; Dae-Shik Suh; Jong-Hyeok Kim; Yong-Man Kim; Young-Tak Kim; Joo-Hyun Nam
Journal:  J Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2014-01-08       Impact factor: 4.401

6.  The Effect of Geographic Units of Analysis on Measuring Geographic Variation in Medical Services Utilization.

Authors:  Agnus M Kim; Jong Heon Park; Sungchan Kang; Kyosang Hwang; Taesik Lee; Yoon Kim
Journal:  J Prev Med Public Health       Date:  2016-07

7.  Trends in Cancer Screening Rates among Korean Men and Women: Results from the Korean National Cancer Screening Survey, 2004-2012.

Authors:  Mina Suh; Kui Son Choi; Yoon Young Lee; Jae Kwan Jun
Journal:  Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2013-06-30       Impact factor: 4.679

8.  Trends in the incidence of in situ and invasive cervical cancer by age group and histological type in Korea from 1993 to 2009.

Authors:  Chang-Mo Oh; Kyu-Won Jung; Young-Joo Won; Aesun Shin; Hyun-Joo Kong; Jae Kwan Jun; Sang-Yoon Park
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-08-16       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Preoperative nomogram for the identification of lymph node metastasis in early cervical cancer.

Authors:  D-Y Kim; S-H Shim; S-O Kim; S-W Lee; J-Y Park; D-S Suh; J-H Kim; Y-M Kim; Y-T Kim; J-H Nam
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2013-11-14       Impact factor: 7.640

10.  Surgical and obstetrical outcomes after laparoscopic radical trachelectomy and pelvic lymphadenectomy for early cervical cancer.

Authors:  So-Eun Yoo; Kyeong A So; Seon-Ah Kim; Mi Kyung Kim; Yoo Kyung Lee; In-Ho Lee; Tae-Jin Kim; Ki Heon Lee
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol Sci       Date:  2016-09-13
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.