M Tummers1, H Knoop, A van Dam, G Bleijenberg. 1. Expert Centre for Chronic Fatigue, Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Centre, The Netherlands. m.tummers@nkcv.umcn.nl
Abstract
BACKGROUND:Cognitive behaviour therapy (CBT) for chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS) is an effective but intensive treatment, requiring trained therapists. A minimal intervention based on CBT for CFS, guided self-instruction, was shown to be an effective treatment when delivered in a tertiary treatment centre. Implementing this intervention in a community-based mental health centre (MHC) will increase the treatment capacity for CFS patients. This study evaluated the effectiveness of guided self-instruction for CFS implemented in an MHC, delivered by nurses. METHOD:One hundred and twenty-three patients were randomly assigned to either guided self-instruction (n=62) or a waiting list (n=61). Randomization was computer generated, with allocation by numbered sealed envelopes. Group allocation was open to all those involved. Patients fulfilled US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) criteria for CFS. Primary outcome variables were fatigue severity and physical and social functioning, measured with the Checklist Individual Strength (CIS) and the Medical Outcomes Survey Short Form-36 (SF-36) respectively. RESULTS: After 6 months, patients who followed guided self-instruction reported a significantly larger decrease in fatigue compared to the waiting list [mean difference -8.1, 95% confidence interval (CI) -3.8 to -12.4, controlled effect size 0.70]. There was no significant difference in physical and social functioning. However, post-hoc analyses showed a significant decrease in fatigue and physical disabilities following the intervention in a subgroup of patients with physical disabilities at baseline (SF-36 physical functioning ⩽70). CONCLUSIONS: Implementation of guided self-instruction in a community-based MHC was partially successful. The minimal intervention can be effectively implemented for CFS patients with physical impairments.
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND: Cognitive behaviour therapy (CBT) for chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS) is an effective but intensive treatment, requiring trained therapists. A minimal intervention based on CBT for CFS, guided self-instruction, was shown to be an effective treatment when delivered in a tertiary treatment centre. Implementing this intervention in a community-based mental health centre (MHC) will increase the treatment capacity for CFS patients. This study evaluated the effectiveness of guided self-instruction for CFS implemented in an MHC, delivered by nurses. METHOD: One hundred and twenty-three patients were randomly assigned to either guided self-instruction (n=62) or a waiting list (n=61). Randomization was computer generated, with allocation by numbered sealed envelopes. Group allocation was open to all those involved. Patients fulfilled US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) criteria for CFS. Primary outcome variables were fatigue severity and physical and social functioning, measured with the Checklist Individual Strength (CIS) and the Medical Outcomes Survey Short Form-36 (SF-36) respectively. RESULTS: After 6 months, patients who followed guided self-instruction reported a significantly larger decrease in fatigue compared to the waiting list [mean difference -8.1, 95% confidence interval (CI) -3.8 to -12.4, controlled effect size 0.70]. There was no significant difference in physical and social functioning. However, post-hoc analyses showed a significant decrease in fatigue and physical disabilities following the intervention in a subgroup of patients with physical disabilities at baseline (SF-36 physical functioning ⩽70). CONCLUSIONS: Implementation of guided self-instruction in a community-based MHC was partially successful. The minimal intervention can be effectively implemented for CFS patients with physical impairments.
Authors: Joanna Leaviss; Sarah Davis; Shijie Ren; Jean Hamilton; Alison Scope; Andrew Booth; Anthea Sutton; Glenys Parry; Marta Buszewicz; Rona Moss-Morris; Peter White Journal: Health Technol Assess Date: 2020-09 Impact factor: 4.014
Authors: Lucy V Clark; Francesca Pesola; Janice M Thomas; Mario Vergara-Williamson; Michelle Beynon; Peter D White Journal: Lancet Date: 2017-06-22 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: Margreet Worm-Smeitink; Arno van Dam; Saskia van Es; Rosalie van der Vaart; Andrea Evers; Michel Wensing; Hans Knoop Journal: J Med Internet Res Date: 2019-10-10 Impact factor: 5.428
Authors: Anne Marit Mengshoel; Ingrid Bergliot Helland; Mira Meeus; Jesus Castro-Marrero; Derek Pheby; Elin Bolle Strand Journal: Int J Qual Stud Health Well-being Date: 2020-12
Authors: Ingrid G Rekeland; Kari Sørland; Ove Bruland; Kristin Risa; Kine Alme; Olav Dahl; Karl J Tronstad; Olav Mella; Øystein Fluge Journal: PLoS One Date: 2022-09-19 Impact factor: 3.752