Literature DB >> 22354995

Dynamic changes in nucleosome occupancy are not predictive of gene expression dynamics but are linked to transcription and chromatin regulators.

Dana J Huebert1, Pei-Fen Kuan, Sündüz Keleş, Audrey P Gasch.   

Abstract

The response to stressful stimuli requires rapid, precise, and dynamic gene expression changes that must be coordinated across the genome. To gain insight into the temporal ordering of genome reorganization, we investigated dynamic relationships between changing nucleosome occupancy, transcription factor binding, and gene expression in Saccharomyces cerevisiae yeast responding to oxidative stress. We applied deep sequencing to nucleosomal DNA at six time points before and after hydrogen peroxide treatment and revealed many distinct dynamic patterns of nucleosome gain and loss. The timing of nucleosome repositioning was not predictive of the dynamics of downstream gene expression change but instead was linked to nucleosome position relative to transcription start sites and specific cis-regulatory elements. We measured genome-wide binding of the stress-activated transcription factor Msn2p over time and found that Msn2p binds different loci with different dynamics. Nucleosome eviction from Msn2p binding sites was common across the genome; however, we show that, contrary to expectation, nucleosome loss occurred after Msn2p binding and in fact required Msn2p. This negates the prevailing model that nucleosomes obscuring Msn2p sites regulate DNA access and must be lost before Msn2p can bind DNA. Together, these results highlight the complexities of stress-dependent chromatin changes and their effects on gene expression.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22354995      PMCID: PMC3347246          DOI: 10.1128/MCB.06170-11

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mol Cell Biol        ISSN: 0270-7306            Impact factor:   4.272


  80 in total

1.  Stable and dynamic nucleosome states during a meiotic developmental process.

Authors:  Liye Zhang; Hong Ma; B Franklin Pugh
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2011-04-22       Impact factor: 9.043

2.  Mechanism of protein access to specific DNA sequences in chromatin: a dynamic equilibrium model for gene regulation.

Authors:  K J Polach; J Widom
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  1995-11-24       Impact factor: 5.469

3.  A high-resolution atlas of nucleosome occupancy in yeast.

Authors:  William Lee; Desiree Tillo; Nicolas Bray; Randall H Morse; Ronald W Davis; Timothy R Hughes; Corey Nislow
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  2007-09-16       Impact factor: 38.330

4.  Interaction of the glucocorticoid receptor with the chromatin landscape.

Authors:  Sam John; Peter J Sabo; Thomas A Johnson; Myong-Hee Sung; Simon C Biddie; Stafford L Lightman; Ty C Voss; Sean R Davis; Paul S Meltzer; John A Stamatoyannopoulos; Gordon L Hager
Journal:  Mol Cell       Date:  2008-03-14       Impact factor: 17.970

5.  Different requirements of the SWI/SNF complex for robust nucleosome displacement at promoters of heat shock factor and Msn2- and Msn4-regulated heat shock genes.

Authors:  Tamara Y Erkina; Paul A Tschetter; Alexandre M Erkine
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2007-12-10       Impact factor: 4.272

6.  Rapid glucocorticoid receptor exchange at a promoter is coupled to transcription and regulated by chaperones and proteasomes.

Authors:  Diana A Stavreva; Waltraud G Müller; Gordon L Hager; Carolyn L Smith; James G McNally
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 4.272

7.  GAL4/GAL80-dependent nucleosome disruption/deposition on the upstream regions of the yeast GAL1-10 and GAL80 genes.

Authors:  D Lohr; J Lopez
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  1995-11-17       Impact factor: 5.157

Review 8.  Impulse control: temporal dynamics in gene transcription.

Authors:  Nir Yosef; Aviv Regev
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2011-03-18       Impact factor: 41.582

9.  Epigenetic inheritance of an inducibly nucleosome-depleted promoter and its associated transcriptional state in the apparent absence of transcriptional activators.

Authors:  Ryosuke Ohsawa; Melissa Adkins; Jessica K Tyler
Journal:  Epigenetics Chromatin       Date:  2009-09-11       Impact factor: 4.954

10.  Dynamic remodeling of individual nucleosomes across a eukaryotic genome in response to transcriptional perturbation.

Authors:  Sushma Shivaswamy; Akshay Bhinge; Yongjun Zhao; Steven Jones; Martin Hirst; Vishwanath R Iyer
Journal:  PLoS Biol       Date:  2008-03-18       Impact factor: 8.029

View more
  36 in total

1.  The histone variant H2A.Z and chromatin remodeler BRAHMA act coordinately and antagonistically to regulate transcription and nucleosome dynamics in Arabidopsis.

Authors:  E Shannon Torres; Roger B Deal
Journal:  Plant J       Date:  2019-03-19       Impact factor: 6.417

Review 2.  Nucleosome positioning in yeasts: methods, maps, and mechanisms.

Authors:  Corinna Lieleg; Nils Krietenstein; Maria Walker; Philipp Korber
Journal:  Chromosoma       Date:  2014-12-23       Impact factor: 4.316

Review 3.  Major Determinants of Nucleosome Positioning.

Authors:  Răzvan V Chereji; David J Clark
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2018-04-06       Impact factor: 4.033

Review 4.  The coupled effect of nucleosome organization on gene transcription level and transcriptional plasticity.

Authors:  Jian Chen; En Li; Jinsheng Lai
Journal:  Nucleus       Date:  2017-11-02       Impact factor: 4.197

5.  A prior-based integrative framework for functional transcriptional regulatory network inference.

Authors:  Alireza F Siahpirani; Sushmita Roy
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2017-02-28       Impact factor: 16.971

6.  Limits on information transduction through amplitude and frequency regulation of transcription factor activity.

Authors:  Anders S Hansen; Erin K O'Shea
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2015-05-18       Impact factor: 8.140

7.  Msn2 coordinates a stoichiometric gene expression program.

Authors:  Jacob Stewart-Ornstein; Christopher Nelson; Joe DeRisi; Jonathan S Weissman; Hana El-Samad
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2013-11-07       Impact factor: 10.834

8.  Genetic architecture of ethanol-responsive transcriptome variation in Saccharomyces cerevisiae strains.

Authors:  Jeffrey A Lewis; Aimee T Broman; Jessica Will; Audrey P Gasch
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2014-06-26       Impact factor: 4.562

9.  Cellular memory of acquired stress resistance in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Authors:  Qiaoning Guan; Suraiya Haroon; Diego González Bravo; Jessica L Will; Audrey P Gasch
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2012-07-30       Impact factor: 4.562

10.  Chromatin proteins: key responders to stress.

Authors:  Karen T Smith; Jerry L Workman
Journal:  PLoS Biol       Date:  2012-07-31       Impact factor: 8.029

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.