Su-Hyun Kim1, Woojun Kim, Xue Feng Li, In-Ja Jung, Ho Jin Kim. 1. Department of Neurology, Research Institute and Hospital of National Cancer Center, 323 Ilsan street, Ilsandong-gu, Goyang-si, Gyeonggi-do, Korea.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: Recent case reports and series have shown that patients with neuromyelitis optica (NMO) experience clinical deterioration under interferon beta (IFN-β) treatment. The objective of the present study was to evaluate whether and to what extent IFN-β exacerbates NMO spectrum disorders (NMOSD). METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of 40 patients with NMOSD who had been treated with IFN-β for more than 6 months and whose disease duration was more than 1 year at the initiation of IFN-β treatment. We evaluated their annualized relapse rates (ARR) and Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) scores before and after IFN-β treatment. RESULTS: In total, 95% of patients exhibited an ineffective or exacerbated response to IFN-β treatment and the mean ARR significantly increased after IFN-β treatment (p = 0.002). The increased ARR > 50% under IFN-β treatment was observed in 20 patients (50%). The mean EDSS score significantly increased following IFN-β treatment (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: In patients with NMOSD, IFN-β treatment is not only ineffective for preventing relapses but also may even increase relapses significantly. Thus, a more careful diagnostic approach to differentiate NMO from multiple sclerosis and attention to decision of treatment is warranted for patients at high risk of NMO.
OBJECTIVES: Recent case reports and series have shown that patients with neuromyelitis optica (NMO) experience clinical deterioration under interferon beta (IFN-β) treatment. The objective of the present study was to evaluate whether and to what extent IFN-β exacerbates NMO spectrum disorders (NMOSD). METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of 40 patients with NMOSD who had been treated with IFN-β for more than 6 months and whose disease duration was more than 1 year at the initiation of IFN-β treatment. We evaluated their annualized relapse rates (ARR) and Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) scores before and after IFN-β treatment. RESULTS: In total, 95% of patients exhibited an ineffective or exacerbated response to IFN-β treatment and the mean ARR significantly increased after IFN-β treatment (p = 0.002). The increased ARR > 50% under IFN-β treatment was observed in 20 patients (50%). The mean EDSS score significantly increased following IFN-β treatment (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: In patients with NMOSD, IFN-β treatment is not only ineffective for preventing relapses but also may even increase relapses significantly. Thus, a more careful diagnostic approach to differentiate NMO from multiple sclerosis and attention to decision of treatment is warranted for patients at high risk of NMO.
Authors: Lucy Matthews; Rita Marasco; Mark Jenkinson; Wilhelm Küker; Sebastian Luppe; Maria Isabel Leite; Antonio Giorgio; Nicola De Stefano; Neil Robertson; Heidi Johansen-Berg; Nikos Evangelou; Jacqueline Palace Journal: Neurology Date: 2013-03-13 Impact factor: 9.910
Authors: Maureen A Mealy; Su-Hyun Kim; Felix Schmidt; Reydmar López; Jorge A Jimenez Arango; Friedemann Paul; Dean M Wingerchuk; Benjamin M Greenberg; Ho Jin Kim; Michael Levy Journal: Mult Scler Date: 2017-08-31 Impact factor: 6.312
Authors: J Kuchling; T Sinnecker; I Bozin; J Dörr; V I Madai; J Sobesky; T Niendorf; F Paul; J Wuerfel Journal: Nervenarzt Date: 2014-04 Impact factor: 1.214