Literature DB >> 22354621

A qualitative study exploring the experience of the partners of cancer survivors and their views on the role of primary care.

Eike Adams1, Mary Boulton, Peter W Rose, Susi Lund, Alison Richardson, Sue Wilson, Eila K Watson.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The partners of cancer survivors may experience distress, anxiety, fear and uncertainty whilst also caring for and supporting a partner who is ill. As they concentrate on the cancer survivor's needs, their own needs may remain unaddressed. Primary care staff may be well placed to support partners as they are generally accessible and may have a better knowledge of the patient's background and family relationships. However, their current involvement in the cancer survivor's and partner's cancer-related care is unclear. This study aimed to describe the experience of the partners of cancer survivors in dealing with cancer-related issues in the first 3 years post-diagnosis, their use of primary care services in relation to these issues and the barriers in doing so and their views on the role that primary care could potentially play in supporting them as carers during this period.
METHODS: Semi-structured interviews with 22 partners of cancer survivors diagnosed within the last 3 years and recruited through six GP practices in the Thames Valley Region of the UK were analysed using the 'framework' approach to thematic analysis.
RESULTS: Three issues were identified as of particular concern to partners: providing practical support, providing emotional support and managing their own health and well-being. Few partners had sought or received support from primary care specifically for cancer-related issues, indicating confidentiality, lack of knowledge of family relationships and the greater need of the cancer survivor as barriers. Most partners would welcome a proactive approach from primary care and felt that this would provide an opportunity to discuss issues they were concerned about.
CONCLUSIONS: Needs and concerns of the partners of cancer survivors in caring for patients are often not addressed. There is a scope for primary care to elicit these needs and provide greater support. Changes to clinical practice in primary care could lead to greater involvement of and to better outcomes for cancer survivors and their partners. A proactive approach to patients and their partners or other close family members at the time of diagnosis through an offer of support and the inclusion in a designated review appointment at the end of initial treatment would be useful.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22354621     DOI: 10.1007/s00520-012-1400-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Support Care Cancer        ISSN: 0941-4355            Impact factor:   3.603


  17 in total

Review 1.  Qualitative research in health care. Analysing qualitative data.

Authors:  C Pope; S Ziebland; N Mays
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2000-01-08

2.  Interviewing separately or as couples? Considerations of authenticity of method.

Authors:  Bridget Taylor; Hilde de Vocht
Journal:  Qual Health Res       Date:  2011-07-07

3.  Self-care and end of life care--patients' and carers' experience a qualitative study utilising serial triangulated interviews.

Authors:  Bridget Margaret Johnston; Stuart Milligan; Claire Foster; Nora Kearney
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2011-08-25       Impact factor: 3.603

4.  Joint and individual interviewing in the context of cancer.

Authors:  S M Morris
Journal:  Qual Health Res       Date:  2001-07

5.  Interventions with family caregivers of cancer patients: meta-analysis of randomized trials.

Authors:  Laurel L Northouse; Maria C Katapodi; Lixin Song; Lingling Zhang; Darlene W Mood
Journal:  CA Cancer J Clin       Date:  2010-08-13       Impact factor: 508.702

6.  Nurses' experience of delivering a supportive intervention for family members of patients with lung cancer.

Authors:  H Plant; S Moore; A Richardson; A Cornwall; J Medina; E Ream
Journal:  Eur J Cancer Care (Engl)       Date:  2011-04-19       Impact factor: 2.520

7.  Variations in and factors influencing family members' decisions for palliative home care.

Authors:  Kelli I Stajduhar; Betty Davies
Journal:  Palliat Med       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 4.762

8.  Positive aspects and challenges associated with caring for a dying relative at home.

Authors:  Peter Hudson
Journal:  Int J Palliat Nurs       Date:  2004-02

9.  "When patients have cancer, they stop seeing me"--the role of the general practitioner in early follow-up of patients with cancer--a qualitative study.

Authors:  Tor Anvik; Knut A Holtedahl; Hege Mikalsen
Journal:  BMC Fam Pract       Date:  2006-03-21       Impact factor: 2.497

10.  Should the surgeon or the general practitioner (GP) follow up patients after surgery for colon cancer? A randomized controlled trial protocol focusing on quality of life, cost-effectiveness and serious clinical events.

Authors:  Knut M Augestad; Barthold Vonen; Ranveig Aspevik; Torunn Nestvold; Unni Ringberg; Roar Johnsen; Jan Norum; Rolv-Ole Lindsetmo
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2008-06-25       Impact factor: 2.655

View more
  9 in total

Review 1.  Prostate cancer and the impact on couples: a qualitative metasynthesis.

Authors:  Nicole Collaço; Carol Rivas; Lauren Matheson; Johana Nayoan; Richard Wagland; Obrey Alexis; Anna Gavin; Adam Glaser; Eila Watson
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2018-03-06       Impact factor: 3.603

2.  Achieving Coordinated Care for Patients With Complex Cases of Cancer: A Multiteam System Approach.

Authors:  Simon J Craddock Lee; Mark A Clark; John V Cox; Burton M Needles; Carole Seigel; Bijal A Balasubramanian
Journal:  J Oncol Pract       Date:  2016-10-31       Impact factor: 3.840

3.  Experience of living with cancer and comorbid illness: protocol for a qualitative systematic review.

Authors:  Debbie Cavers; Sarah Cunningham-Burley; Eila Watson; Elspeth Banks; Christine Campbell
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2017-05-09       Impact factor: 2.692

4.  Care coordination for complex cancer survivors in an integrated safety-net system: a study protocol.

Authors:  Simon J Craddock Lee; Katelyn K Jetelina; Emily Marks; Eric Shaw; Kevin Oeffinger; Deborah Cohen; Noel O Santini; John V Cox; Bijal A Balasubramanian
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2018-12-04       Impact factor: 4.430

5.  Setting the research agenda for living with and beyond cancer with comorbid illness: reflections on a research prioritisation exercise.

Authors:  D Cavers; S Cunningham-Burley; E Watson; E Banks; C Campbell
Journal:  Res Involv Engagem       Date:  2020-04-29

Review 6.  What is the evidence behind cancer care reviews, a primary care cancer support tool? A scoping review.

Authors:  Dipesh P Gopal; Tahania Ahmad; Nikolaos Efstathiou; Ping Guo; Stephanie J C Taylor
Journal:  J Cancer Surviv       Date:  2022-09-06       Impact factor: 4.062

7.  A Qualitative Investigation of Health Care Professionals', Patients' and Partners' Views on Psychosocial Issues and Related Interventions for Couples Coping with Cancer.

Authors:  Tim Regan; Janelle V Levesque; Sylvie D Lambert; Brian Kelly
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-07-29       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  A dyadic approach to understanding the impact of breast cancer on relationships between partners during early survivorship.

Authors:  Sharon Keesing; Lorna Rosenwax; Beverley McNamara
Journal:  BMC Womens Health       Date:  2016-08-25       Impact factor: 2.809

9.  Living with and beyond cancer with comorbid illness: a qualitative systematic review and evidence synthesis.

Authors:  Debbie Cavers; Liset Habets; Sarah Cunningham-Burley; Eila Watson; Elspeth Banks; Christine Campbell
Journal:  J Cancer Surviv       Date:  2019-01-26       Impact factor: 4.442

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.