BACKGROUND AND AIM: Differentiating Crohn's disease from intestinal tuberculosis often challenges clinicians in countries where tuberculosis and Crohn's disease coexist. The aim of this study was to screen out clinical, endoscopic and histological features which may be helpful in distinguishing Crohn's disease from intestinal tuberculosis. METHODS: 43 patients with a confirmed diagnosis of intestinal tuberculosis and 53 patients with Crohn's disease were recruited for this study. Their clinical, endoscopic and histological features were subjected to univariate and multivariate analyses. RESULTS: On univariate analysis, the features of hematochezia, intestinal obstruction, fistula, oral ulcers, longitudinal ulcers, cobblestone appearance and pseudopolyps were more common in Crohn's disease than in intestinal tuberculosis (p < 0.05). The features of night sweats, concomitant pulmonary tuberculosis, positive tuberculin skin test, positive antibody to tuberculosis, abdominal lymphadenopathy, ascites, transverse ulcers, patulous ileocecal valve, and granulomas were more common in intestinal tuberculosis than in Crohn's disease (p < 0.05). Granulomas exceeding 300 μm in maximal diameter, more than five granulomas per section, and confluent granulomas were more frequently identified in intestinal tuberculosis than in Crohn's disease (p < 0.05). On further multivariable logistic regression analysis, night sweats (OR 0.1, CI 0.02-0.1), longitudinal ulcers (OR 35.5, CI 1.8-683.2), and granulomas (OR 0.02, CI 0.002-0.2) were found to be significant predictors in differentiating Crohn's disease from intestinal tuberculosis. Receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) analysis was performed on the scores of patients from the final multivariate logistic model, and the area under the ROC curve was 0.8642 (95% CI 0.79-0.94). CONCLUSIONS: Night sweats, longitudinal ulcers and granulomas were the most important features to differentiate Crohn's disease from intestinal tuberculosis.
BACKGROUND AND AIM: Differentiating Crohn's disease from intestinal tuberculosis often challenges clinicians in countries where tuberculosis and Crohn's disease coexist. The aim of this study was to screen out clinical, endoscopic and histological features which may be helpful in distinguishing Crohn's disease from intestinal tuberculosis. METHODS: 43 patients with a confirmed diagnosis of intestinal tuberculosis and 53 patients with Crohn's disease were recruited for this study. Their clinical, endoscopic and histological features were subjected to univariate and multivariate analyses. RESULTS: On univariate analysis, the features of hematochezia, intestinal obstruction, fistula, oral ulcers, longitudinal ulcers, cobblestone appearance and pseudopolyps were more common in Crohn's disease than in intestinal tuberculosis (p < 0.05). The features of night sweats, concomitant pulmonary tuberculosis, positive tuberculin skin test, positive antibody to tuberculosis, abdominal lymphadenopathy, ascites, transverse ulcers, patulous ileocecal valve, and granulomas were more common in intestinal tuberculosis than in Crohn's disease (p < 0.05). Granulomas exceeding 300 μm in maximal diameter, more than five granulomas per section, and confluent granulomas were more frequently identified in intestinal tuberculosis than in Crohn's disease (p < 0.05). On further multivariable logistic regression analysis, night sweats (OR 0.1, CI 0.02-0.1), longitudinal ulcers (OR 35.5, CI 1.8-683.2), and granulomas (OR 0.02, CI 0.002-0.2) were found to be significant predictors in differentiating Crohn's disease from intestinal tuberculosis. Receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) analysis was performed on the scores of patients from the final multivariate logistic model, and the area under the ROC curve was 0.8642 (95% CI 0.79-0.94). CONCLUSIONS: Night sweats, longitudinal ulcers and granulomas were the most important features to differentiate Crohn's disease from intestinal tuberculosis.
Authors: Geir Larsson; Koticherry Thrivikrama Shenoy; Ramalingom Ramasubramanian; Lakshmikanthan Thayumanavan; Leena Kondarappassery Balakumaran; Gunnar A Bjune; Bjørn A Moum Journal: United European Gastroenterol J Date: 2014-10 Impact factor: 4.623
Authors: Julajak Limsrivilai; Andrew B Shreiner; Ananya Pongpaibul; Charlie Laohapand; Rewat Boonanuwat; Nonthalee Pausawasdi; Supot Pongprasobchai; Sathaporn Manatsathit; Peter D R Higgins Journal: Am J Gastroenterol Date: 2017-01-03 Impact factor: 10.864
Authors: Christopher Andrew Lamb; Nicholas A Kennedy; Tim Raine; Philip Anthony Hendy; Philip J Smith; Jimmy K Limdi; Bu'Hussain Hayee; Miranda C E Lomer; Gareth C Parkes; Christian Selinger; Kevin J Barrett; R Justin Davies; Cathy Bennett; Stuart Gittens; Malcolm G Dunlop; Omar Faiz; Aileen Fraser; Vikki Garrick; Paul D Johnston; Miles Parkes; Jeremy Sanderson; Helen Terry; Daniel R Gaya; Tariq H Iqbal; Stuart A Taylor; Melissa Smith; Matthew Brookes; Richard Hansen; A Barney Hawthorne Journal: Gut Date: 2019-09-27 Impact factor: 23.059
Authors: Saurabh Kedia; Raju Sharma; Govind K Makharia; Vineet Ahuja; Devendra Desai; Devasenathipathy Kandasamy; Anu Eapen; Karthik Ganesan; Uday C Ghoshal; Naveen Kalra; D Karthikeyan; Kumble Seetharama Madhusudhan; Mathew Philip; Amarender Singh Puri; Sunil Puri; Saroj K Sinha; Rupa Banerjee; Shobna Bhatia; Naresh Bhat; Sunil Dadhich; G K Dhali; B D Goswami; S K Issar; V Jayanthi; S P Misra; Sandeep Nijhawan; Pankaj Puri; Avik Sarkar; S P Singh; Anshu Srivastava; Philip Abraham; B S Ramakrishna Journal: Indian J Gastroenterol Date: 2018-01-06
Authors: Sören L Becker; Jürg Vogt; Stefanie Knopp; Marcus Panning; David C Warhurst; Katja Polman; Hanspeter Marti; Lutz von Müller; Cedric P Yansouni; Jan Jacobs; Emmanuel Bottieau; Moussa Sacko; Suman Rijal; Fransiska Meyanti; Michael A Miles; Marleen Boelaert; Pascal Lutumba; Lisette van Lieshout; Eliézer K N'Goran; François Chappuis; Jürg Utzinger Journal: BMC Infect Dis Date: 2013-01-24 Impact factor: 3.090