BACKGROUND: In countries where tracking mortality and clinical cause of death are not routinely undertaken, gathering verbal autopsies (VA) is the principal method of estimating cause of death. The most common method for determining probable cause of death from the VA interview is Physician-Certified Verbal Autopsy (PCVA). A recent alternative method to interpret Verbal Autopsy (InterVA) is a computer model using a Bayesian approach to derive posterior probabilities for causes of death, given an a priori distribution at population level and a set of interview-based indicators. The model uses the same input information as PCVA, with the exception of narrative text information, which physicians can consult but which were not inputted into the model. Comparing the results of physician coding with the model, large differences could be due to difficulties in diagnosing malaria, especially in holo-endemic regions. Thus, the aim of the study was to explore whether physicians' access to electronically unavailable narrative text helps to explain the large discrepancy in malaria cause-specific mortality fractions (CSMFs) in physician coding versus the model. METHODS: Free-texts of electronically available records (N = 5,649) were summarised and incorporated into the InterVA version 3 (InterVA-3) for three sub-groups: (i) a 10%-representative subsample (N = 493) (ii) records diagnosed as malaria by physicians and not by the model (N = 1035), and (iii) records diagnosed by the model as malaria, but not by physicians (N = 332). CSMF results before and after free-text incorporation were compared. RESULTS: There were changes of between 5.5-10.2% between models before and after free-text incorporation. No impact on malaria CSMFs was seen in the representative sub-sample, but the proportion of malaria as cause of death increased in the physician sub-sample (2.7%) and saw a large decrease in the InterVA subsample (9.9%). Information on 13/106 indicators appeared at least once in the free-texts that had not been matched to any item in the structured, electronically available portion of the Nouna questionnaire. DISCUSSION: Free-texts are helpful in gathering information not adequately captured in VA questionnaires, though access to free-text does not explain differences in physician and model determination of malaria as cause of death.
BACKGROUND: In countries where tracking mortality and clinical cause of death are not routinely undertaken, gathering verbal autopsies (VA) is the principal method of estimating cause of death. The most common method for determining probable cause of death from the VA interview is Physician-Certified Verbal Autopsy (PCVA). A recent alternative method to interpret Verbal Autopsy (InterVA) is a computer model using a Bayesian approach to derive posterior probabilities for causes of death, given an a priori distribution at population level and a set of interview-based indicators. The model uses the same input information as PCVA, with the exception of narrative text information, which physicians can consult but which were not inputted into the model. Comparing the results of physician coding with the model, large differences could be due to difficulties in diagnosing malaria, especially in holo-endemic regions. Thus, the aim of the study was to explore whether physicians' access to electronically unavailable narrative text helps to explain the large discrepancy in malaria cause-specific mortality fractions (CSMFs) in physician coding versus the model. METHODS: Free-texts of electronically available records (N = 5,649) were summarised and incorporated into the InterVA version 3 (InterVA-3) for three sub-groups: (i) a 10%-representative subsample (N = 493) (ii) records diagnosed as malaria by physicians and not by the model (N = 1035), and (iii) records diagnosed by the model as malaria, but not by physicians (N = 332). CSMF results before and after free-text incorporation were compared. RESULTS: There were changes of between 5.5-10.2% between models before and after free-text incorporation. No impact on malaria CSMFs was seen in the representative sub-sample, but the proportion of malaria as cause of death increased in the physician sub-sample (2.7%) and saw a large decrease in the InterVA subsample (9.9%). Information on 13/106 indicators appeared at least once in the free-texts that had not been matched to any item in the structured, electronically available portion of the Nouna questionnaire. DISCUSSION: Free-texts are helpful in gathering information not adequately captured in VA questionnaires, though access to free-text does not explain differences in physician and model determination of malaria as cause of death.
Authors: Martin Adjuik; Tom Smith; Sam Clark; Jim Todd; Anu Garrib; Yohannes Kinfu; Kathy Kahn; Mitiki Mola; Ali Ashraf; Honorati Masanja; Kubaje Adazu; Ubaje Adazu; Jahit Sacarlal; Nurul Alam; Adama Marra; Adjima Gbangou; Eleuther Mwageni; Fred Binka Journal: Bull World Health Organ Date: 2006-03-22 Impact factor: 9.408
Authors: Rohina Joshi; Alan D Lopez; Stephen MacMahon; Srinath Reddy; Rakhi Dandona; Lalit Dandona; Bruce Neal Journal: Bull World Health Organ Date: 2009-01 Impact factor: 9.408
Authors: David R Marsh; Salim Sadruddin; Fariyal F Fikree; Chitra Krishnan; Gary L Darmstadt Journal: Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol Date: 2003-04 Impact factor: 3.980
Authors: Heribert Ramroth; Robert P Ndugwa; Olaf Müller; Yazoume Yé; Ali Sié; Bocar Kouyaté; Heiko Becher Journal: Glob Health Action Date: 2009-04-15 Impact factor: 2.640
Authors: Heribert Ramroth; Eva Lorenz; Johanna C Rankin; Edward Fottrell; Maurice Yé; Florian Neuhann; Mark Ssennono; Ali Sié; Peter Byass; Heiko Becher Journal: Trop Med Int Health Date: 2012-05-11 Impact factor: 2.622
Authors: Patricia Loh; Edward Fottrell; James Beard; Naor Bar-Zeev; Tambosi Phiri; Masford Banda; Charles Makwenda; Jon Bird; Carina King Journal: BMJ Paediatr Open Date: 2021-02-05