Lourens J P Nonkes1, Maaike de Pooter, Judith R Homberg. 1. Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behaviour, Centre for Neuroscience, Department of Cognitive Neuroscience, Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Centre, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The "biological susceptibility" model posits that some individuals, by genetic predisposition, are highly sensitive to environmental stimuli. Exposure to adverse stimuli leads to negative outcomes, and better outcomes follow favourable stimuli. Recent studies indicate that individuals carrying the low-activity (short; s) variant of the serotonin transporter (5-HTT)-linked polymorphic region (5-HTTLPR) show an enhanced vulnerability to posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD). Simultaneously, they respond poorly to exposure therapy, the first-line treatment to enhance fear extinction in individuals with PTSD. Given that s-allele carriers also show improved adaptive responding when exposed to positive stimuli, we hypothesized that this trait could be used to offset impaired fear extinction. METHODS: We explored this hypothesis preclinically using wild-type and 5-HTT knockout (5-HTT-/-) male rats (n = 36) that share behavioural similarities with 5-HTTLPR s-allele carriers. Subsequent to cued fear conditioning, animals were tested for short- (1 and 2 days postconditioning) and long-term (6 days postconditioning) fear extinction in the absence or presence of a secondary "distracting" stimulus predicting the delivery of sucrose pellets. RESULTS: Introducing a secondary stimulus predicting sucrose pellets that distracts attention away from the fear-predicting stimulus led to a long-lasting improvement of impaired fear extinction in 5-HTT-/- male rats. LIMITATIONS: The contextdependency of the efficacy of the "distraction therapy" was not tested. In addition, it remains to be clarified whether the positive valence of the distracting stimulus is critical for the distraction of attention or whether a neutral and/or novel stimulus can induce similar effects. Finally, although of lesser importance from a therapeutic perspective, underlying mechanisms remain to be elucidated. CONCLUSION: These data indicate that positive environmental stimuli can be used to offset heightened responses to negative stimuli, particularly in individuals characterized by inherited 5-HTT downregulation and high sensitivity to environmental stimuli.
BACKGROUND: The "biological susceptibility" model posits that some individuals, by genetic predisposition, are highly sensitive to environmental stimuli. Exposure to adverse stimuli leads to negative outcomes, and better outcomes follow favourable stimuli. Recent studies indicate that individuals carrying the low-activity (short; s) variant of the serotonin transporter (5-HTT)-linked polymorphic region (5-HTTLPR) show an enhanced vulnerability to posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD). Simultaneously, they respond poorly to exposure therapy, the first-line treatment to enhance fear extinction in individuals with PTSD. Given that s-allele carriers also show improved adaptive responding when exposed to positive stimuli, we hypothesized that this trait could be used to offset impaired fear extinction. METHODS: We explored this hypothesis preclinically using wild-type and 5-HTT knockout (5-HTT-/-) male rats (n = 36) that share behavioural similarities with 5-HTTLPR s-allele carriers. Subsequent to cued fear conditioning, animals were tested for short- (1 and 2 days postconditioning) and long-term (6 days postconditioning) fear extinction in the absence or presence of a secondary "distracting" stimulus predicting the delivery of sucrose pellets. RESULTS: Introducing a secondary stimulus predicting sucrose pellets that distracts attention away from the fear-predicting stimulus led to a long-lasting improvement of impaired fear extinction in 5-HTT-/- male rats. LIMITATIONS: The contextdependency of the efficacy of the "distraction therapy" was not tested. In addition, it remains to be clarified whether the positive valence of the distracting stimulus is critical for the distraction of attention or whether a neutral and/or novel stimulus can induce similar effects. Finally, although of lesser importance from a therapeutic perspective, underlying mechanisms remain to be elucidated. CONCLUSION: These data indicate that positive environmental stimuli can be used to offset heightened responses to negative stimuli, particularly in individuals characterized by inherited 5-HTT downregulation and high sensitivity to environmental stimuli.
Authors: Richard A Bryant; Kim L Felmingham; Erin M Falconer; Laarnie Pe Benito; Carol Dobson-Stone; Kerrie D Pierce; Peter R Schofield Journal: Biol Psychiatry Date: 2010-06-15 Impact factor: 13.382
Authors: Michael L Anstey; Stephen M Rogers; Swidbert R Ott; Malcolm Burrows; Stephen J Simpson Journal: Science Date: 2009-01-30 Impact factor: 47.728
Authors: Pingxing Xie; Henry R Kranzler; James Poling; Murray B Stein; Raymond F Anton; Kathleen Brady; Roger D Weiss; Lindsay Farrer; Joel Gelernter Journal: Arch Gen Psychiatry Date: 2009-11
Authors: Karestan C Koenen; Allison E Aiello; Erin Bakshis; Ananda B Amstadter; Kenneth J Ruggiero; Ron Acierno; Dean G Kilpatrick; Joel Gelernter; Sandro Galea Journal: Am J Epidemiol Date: 2009-02-19 Impact factor: 4.897
Authors: J R Homberg; J D A Olivier; B M G Smits; J D Mul; J Mudde; M Verheul; O F M Nieuwenhuizen; A R Cools; E Ronken; T Cremers; A N M Schoffelmeer; B A Ellenbroek; E Cuppen Journal: Neuroscience Date: 2007-04-30 Impact factor: 3.590
Authors: Dean G Kilpatrick; Karestan C Koenen; Kenneth J Ruggiero; Ron Acierno; Sandro Galea; Heidi S Resnick; John Roitzsch; John Boyle; Joel Gelernter Journal: Am J Psychiatry Date: 2007-11 Impact factor: 18.112
Authors: Jonathan L Brigman; Poonam Mathur; Judith Harvey-White; Alicia Izquierdo; Lisa M Saksida; Timothy J Bussey; Stephanie Fox; Evan Deneris; Dennis L Murphy; Andrew Holmes Journal: Cereb Cortex Date: 2009-12-23 Impact factor: 5.357
Authors: Rick H A van der Doelen; Francesca Calabrese; Gianluigi Guidotti; Bram Geenen; Marco A Riva; Tamás Kozicz; Judith R Homberg Journal: Front Behav Neurosci Date: 2014-10-13 Impact factor: 3.558