Literature DB >> 22353532

Evaluation of oncological adequacy of laparoscopic distal gastrectomy with special attention to lymph node dissection: a comparison with conventional open gastrectomy.

Osamu Ikeda1, Yoshihisa Sakaguchi, Yasushi Toh, Kippei Oogaki, Eiji Oki, Kazuhito Minami, Takeshi Okamura, Hideo Baba.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Laparoscopic distal gastrectomy (LDG) with lymphadenectomy has been revealed to be a useful treatment for early gastric cancer but oncological adequacy is controversial.
METHODOLOGY: To assess the quality of lymphadenectomy, we evaluated the number of dissected lymph nodes and the non-compliance rate (defined as an absence of nodal tissue at a node station that should have been resected) and compared the data obtained from 102 patients treated by LDG with those from 90 patients treated by open distal gastrectomy (ODG).
RESULTS: The numbers of nodes of Categories 1 and 2, which correspond respectively to perigastric and retroperitoneal nodes, did not differ significantly between the LDG group and the ODG group. In the LDG group compared to the ODG group, there were significantly more right paracardial nodes (No. 1) but there were significantly fewer infrapyloric nodes (No. 6). However, the difference in infrapyloric nodes (No. 6) became insignificant when we re-analyzed and compared the ODG group and the patients (n=42) whose LDGs were performed by two experienced laparoscopic surgeons.
CONCLUSIONS: The curability of gastric cancer on LDG was almost equivalent to that of ODG from the viewpoint of lymph node dissection, if the LDG is performed by two experienced laparoscopic surgeons. These data suggested that LDG with lymphadenectomy could possibly be adopted for advanced gastric cancer treatment under proper quality control, such as that provided by an experienced laparoscopic team.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22353532     DOI: 10.5754/hge10089

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hepatogastroenterology        ISSN: 0172-6390


  6 in total

1.  Comparison of laparoscopic versus open gastrectomy for advanced gastric cancer: an updated meta-analysis.

Authors:  Yingjun Quan; Ao Huang; Min Ye; Ming Xu; Biao Zhuang; Peng Zhang; Bo Yu; Zhijun Min
Journal:  Gastric Cancer       Date:  2015-07-28       Impact factor: 7.370

Review 2.  Laparoscopic and robot-assisted gastrectomy for gastric cancer: Current considerations.

Authors:  Stefano Caruso; Alberto Patriti; Franco Roviello; Lorenzo De Franco; Franco Franceschini; Andrea Coratti; Graziano Ceccarelli
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2016-07-07       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 3.  Quality of D2 lymphadenectomy for advanced gastric cancer: is laparoscopic-assisted distal gastrectomy as effective as open distal gastrectomy?

Authors:  Canrong Lu; Sixin Zhou; Zheng Peng; Lin Chen
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2014-10-08       Impact factor: 4.584

4.  Safety and feasibility of laparoscopic liver resection with associated lymphadenectomy for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: a propensity score-based case-matched analysis from a single institution.

Authors:  Francesca Ratti; Federica Cipriani; Riccardo Ariotti; Annalisa Gagliano; Michele Paganelli; Marco Catena; Luca Aldrighetti
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2015-07-21       Impact factor: 4.584

5.  A pilot study of lymph node mapping with indocyanine green in robotic gastrectomy for gastric cancer.

Authors:  Yuan-Tzu Lan; Kuo-Hung Huang; Ping-Hsien Chen; Chien-An Liu; Su-Shun Lo; Chew-Wun Wu; Yi-Ming Shyr; Wen-Liang Fang
Journal:  SAGE Open Med       Date:  2017-08-21

6.  Laparoscopic versus open approach in gastrectomy for advanced gastric cancer: a systematic review.

Authors:  Zhipeng Zhu; Lulu Li; Jiuhua Xu; Weipeng Ye; Junjie Zeng; Borong Chen; Zhengjie Huang
Journal:  World J Surg Oncol       Date:  2020-06-13       Impact factor: 2.754

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.