OBJECTIVE: We examined physicians' perceived needs, benefits, and concerns regarding health information exchange (HIE) technology prior to experiencing it and their actual usage of exchanged information in care processes during an HIE pilot program in South Korea. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We conducted a survey through a structured questionnaire to collect data on physician perceptions about an HIE prior to implementation. We analyzed responses using descriptive statistics and one-way analyses of variance. We also conducted a post-implementation survey through a computerized tool designed to collect data on physician assessment of HIE item usefulness. We defined two indices to measure the volume of information flow and usefulness for individual HIE items and analyzed the indices with Fisher's exact test. RESULTS: Physicians' overall perceptions about the need for an HIE and benefits of the technology were positive despite their concerns about information safety and security, system costs, and disputes between care providers in cases of malpractice. We found that physician practice settings significantly influenced the details of their perceptions. In the both pre- and post-implementation studies, the most needed and valued information were pathology and lab results, diagnostic imaging, medication, and working diagnosis. Physicians most agreed with the benefit potentials in the quality domain, least agreed with those in time and cost savings of healthcare delivery, and least worried about the decrease in revenues resulting from the technology. CONCLUSIONS: The overall physician acceptance of the HIE technology in South Korea is promising, but the adoption and diffusion strategy needs to be tailored to the type of physician practice. Concerted efforts may be needed to realize the much-anticipated potential of healthcare cost savings.
OBJECTIVE: We examined physicians' perceived needs, benefits, and concerns regarding health information exchange (HIE) technology prior to experiencing it and their actual usage of exchanged information in care processes during an HIE pilot program in South Korea. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We conducted a survey through a structured questionnaire to collect data on physician perceptions about an HIE prior to implementation. We analyzed responses using descriptive statistics and one-way analyses of variance. We also conducted a post-implementation survey through a computerized tool designed to collect data on physician assessment of HIE item usefulness. We defined two indices to measure the volume of information flow and usefulness for individual HIE items and analyzed the indices with Fisher's exact test. RESULTS: Physicians' overall perceptions about the need for an HIE and benefits of the technology were positive despite their concerns about information safety and security, system costs, and disputes between care providers in cases of malpractice. We found that physician practice settings significantly influenced the details of their perceptions. In the both pre- and post-implementation studies, the most needed and valued information were pathology and lab results, diagnostic imaging, medication, and working diagnosis. Physicians most agreed with the benefit potentials in the quality domain, least agreed with those in time and cost savings of healthcare delivery, and least worried about the decrease in revenues resulting from the technology. CONCLUSIONS: The overall physician acceptance of the HIE technology in South Korea is promising, but the adoption and diffusion strategy needs to be tailored to the type of physician practice. Concerted efforts may be needed to realize the much-anticipated potential of healthcare cost savings.
Authors: Jan Walker; Eric Pan; Douglas Johnston; Julia Adler-Milstein; David W Bates; Blackford Middleton Journal: Health Aff (Millwood) Date: 2005 Jan-Jun Impact factor: 6.301
Authors: Peter Sprivulis; Jan Walker; Douglas Johnston; Eric Pan; Julia Adler-Milstein; Blackford Middleton; David W Bates Journal: Aust Health Rev Date: 2007-11 Impact factor: 1.990
Authors: George Hripcsak; Rainu Kaushal; Kevin B Johnson; Joan S Ash; David W Bates; Rachel Block; Mark E Frisse; Lisa M Kern; Janet Marchibroda; J Marc Overhage; Adam B Wilcox Journal: J Biomed Inform Date: 2007-08-30 Impact factor: 6.317
Authors: Jason S Shapiro; Joseph Kannry; Mark Lipton; Eric Goldberg; Paul Conocenti; Susan Stuard; Brian M Wyatt; Gilad Kuperman Journal: Ann Emerg Med Date: 2006-06-06 Impact factor: 5.721
Authors: William A Yasnoff; Betsy L Humphreys; J Marc Overhage; Don E Detmer; Patricia Flatley Brennan; Richard W Morris; Blackford Middleton; David W Bates; John P Fanning Journal: J Am Med Inform Assoc Date: 2004-06-07 Impact factor: 4.497
Authors: W O Hackl; A Hoerbst; G Duftschmid; W Gall; S Janzek-Hawlat; M Jung; K Woertz; W Dorda; E Ammenwerth Journal: Appl Clin Inform Date: 2014-06-04 Impact factor: 2.342
Authors: Emily Beth Devine; Annette M Totten; Paul Gorman; Karen B Eden; Steven Kassakian; Susan Woods; Monica Daeges; Miranda Pappas; Marian McDonagh; William R Hersh Journal: EGEMS (Wash DC) Date: 2017-12-07
Authors: Keehyuck Lee; Kahyun Lim; Se Young Jung; Hyerim Ji; Kyungpyo Hong; Hee Hwang; Ho-Young Lee Journal: J Med Internet Res Date: 2020-11-13 Impact factor: 5.428