| Literature DB >> 22352741 |
W Brad Johnson1, Jeffrey E Barnett, Nancy S Elman, Linda Forrest, Nadine J Kaslow.
Abstract
Psychologists are ethically obligated to ensure their own competence. When problems of professional competence occur, psychologists must take appropriate steps to regain competence while protecting those they serve. Yet conceptualizations of the competence obligation are thoroughly intertwined with Western ideals of individualism and a model of the person as self-contained, self-controlled, and perpetually rational. Research in health care, education, and multicultural and social psychology raise serious doubts about psychologists' capacity for consistently accurate self-assessments of competence. To address this problem, the authors advocate that education, training, professional ethics standards, and credentialing criteria be infused with a robust communitarian ethos and a culturally pervasive ethic of care. The authors propose a shift in discourse about competence to incorporate both competent individuals and competent communities.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2012 PMID: 22352741 DOI: 10.1037/a0027206
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Am Psychol ISSN: 0003-066X