Literature DB >> 22352476

Effects of seeing the interlocutor on the production of prosodic contrasts (L).

Erin Cvejic1, Jeesun Kim, Chris Davis.   

Abstract

This study investigated whether the production of prosodic focus and phrasing contrasts was modified when interlocutors could only hear each other [auditory only (AO)], compared to when they could hear and see each other [face to face (FTF)]. The prosodic characteristics of utterances produced by six talkers were examined using both acoustic and perceptual measures (ratings of the degree of focus or clarity of the statement-question contrast). The acoustic measures showed a range of differences between narrow focus and between phrasing contrasts and some of these differences were greater in the AO setting than the FTF one. The listener's ratings of focus and phrasing showed a clear difference between the AO and FTF conditions, with perceptual attributes of both narrow focus and echoic question phrasing being rated as clearer in the AO condition. To explain these results it is proposed that talkers compensate for the lack of visual prosodic cues in the AO condition by taking extra care (relative to FTF conditions) to ensure the effective transmission of prosodic cues.
© 2012 Acoustical Society of America

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22352476     DOI: 10.1121/1.3676605

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  1 in total

1.  EFFECTS OF MOUTHING AND INTERLOCUTOR PRESENCE ON MOVEMENTS OF VISIBLE VS. NON-VISIBLE ARTICULATORS.

Authors:  Katie Bicevskis; Jonathan de Vries; Laurie Green; Johannes Heim; Jurij Božič; Joe D'Aquisto; Michael Fry; Emily Sadlier-Brown; Oksana Tkachman; Noriko Yamane; Bryan Gick
Journal:  Can Acoust       Date:  2016
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.