Literature DB >> 22352345

Use of hazard indices for a theoretical evaluation of cigarette smoke composition.

Hans-Juergen Haussmann1.   

Abstract

The chemical composition of cigarette mainstream smoke (MS) has been quantitatively analyzed in multiple studies, often with the objective to toxicologically evaluate and compare various types of MS. Increases and decreases in yields of constituents between MS types can only be consolidated if these yields are compared on the basis of toxicological properties of the individual constituents. For the risk assessment of various complex mixtures including MS, a hazard index (HI) approach has been used that requires weighing of the exposure to individual MS constituents by cancer and noncancer potency values. The objective of the current study is to review the past uses of the HI concept for MS and smokeless tobacco and discuss strengths and limitations of using this concept. Published information as well as information made available on the Web was used. The HI concept has been applied to MS for determining and comparing theoretical lifetime risks, for consumer communication, for the prioritization of constituents for reduction, for ingredient assessment, and for the selection of constituents for regulation. The limitations of this approach are associated with the limited number of MS constituents with available yield data, the gaps and uncertainties in available potency values, the application to relatively high exposure concentrations, and the default assumption of additivity. The derived theoretical noncancer index is dominated by acrolein to an extent that there seems to be not much advantage in using the HI concept for noncancer assessments. The derived theoretical cancer index is dominated by genotoxic carcinogens of the MS vapor phase and may thus complement currently used toxicological assays in a tiered evaluation approach. As is the case for every other assay and interpretation model, the HI concept needs to be applied with its limitations and weaknesses in mind. Its best application is for comparative purposes. It should be kept in mind that the HI concept is a theoretical concept and does not provide actual risk information.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22352345     DOI: 10.1021/tx200536w

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Chem Res Toxicol        ISSN: 0893-228X            Impact factor:   3.739


  52 in total

1.  Crotonaldehyde-induced vascular relaxation and toxicity: Role of endothelium and transient receptor potential ankyrin-1 (TRPA1).

Authors:  L Jin; G Jagatheesan; J Lynch; L Guo; D J Conklin
Journal:  Toxicol Appl Pharmacol       Date:  2020-04-19       Impact factor: 4.219

Review 2.  Modeling drug exposure in rodents using e-cigarettes and other electronic nicotine delivery systems.

Authors:  Cristina Miliano; E Reilly Scott; Laura B Murdaugh; Emma R Gnatowski; Christine L Faunce; Megan S Anderson; Malissa M Reyes; Ann M Gregus; Matthew W Buczynski
Journal:  J Neurosci Methods       Date:  2019-10-12       Impact factor: 2.390

3.  Comparison of Systemic Exposure to Toxic and/or Carcinogenic Volatile Organic Compounds (VOC) during Vaping, Smoking, and Abstention.

Authors:  Gideon St Helen; Evangelia Liakoni; Natalie Nardone; Newton Addo; Peyton Jacob; Neal L Benowitz
Journal:  Cancer Prev Res (Phila)       Date:  2019-09-25

4.  The effect of loaded deep inhale training on mild and moderate COPD smokers.

Authors:  Yong-Cun Chen; Jian-Min Cao; Hai-Tao Zhou; Xian Guo; Yi Wang
Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Med       Date:  2014-10-15

5.  Quantitative Liquid Chromatography-Nanoelectrospray Ionization-High-Resolution Tandem Mass Spectrometry Analysis of Acrolein-DNA Adducts and Etheno-DNA Adducts in Oral Cells from Cigarette Smokers and Nonsmokers.

Authors:  Viviana Paiano; Laura Maertens; Valeria Guidolin; Jing Yang; Silvia Balbo; Stephen S Hecht
Journal:  Chem Res Toxicol       Date:  2020-07-22       Impact factor: 3.739

Review 6.  Emerging mechanistic targets in lung injury induced by combustion-generated particles.

Authors:  Marc W Fariss; M Ian Gilmour; Christopher A Reilly; Wolfgang Liedtke; Andrew J Ghio
Journal:  Toxicol Sci       Date:  2013-01-14       Impact factor: 4.849

7.  Effect of Immediate vs Gradual Reduction in Nicotine Content of Cigarettes on Biomarkers of Smoke Exposure: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Authors:  Dorothy K Hatsukami; Xianghua Luo; Joni A Jensen; Mustafa al'Absi; Sharon S Allen; Steven G Carmella; Menglan Chen; Paul M Cinciripini; Rachel Denlinger-Apte; David J Drobes; Joseph S Koopmeiners; Tonya Lane; Chap T Le; Scott Leischow; Kai Luo; F Joseph McClernon; Sharon E Murphy; Viviana Paiano; Jason D Robinson; Herbert Severson; Christopher Sipe; Andrew A Strasser; Lori G Strayer; Mei Kuen Tang; Ryan Vandrey; Stephen S Hecht; Neal L Benowitz; Eric C Donny
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2018-09-04       Impact factor: 56.272

8.  TRPA1 mediates changes in heart rate variability and cardiac mechanical function in mice exposed to acrolein.

Authors:  Nicole Kurhanewicz; Rachel McIntosh-Kastrinsky; Haiyan Tong; Allen Ledbetter; Leon Walsh; Aimen Farraj; Mehdi Hazari
Journal:  Toxicol Appl Pharmacol       Date:  2016-10-13       Impact factor: 4.219

9.  Tobacco Consumption and Toxicant Exposure of Cigarette Smokers Using Electronic Cigarettes.

Authors:  Kim Pulvers; Ashley S Emami; Nicole L Nollen; Devan R Romero; David R Strong; Neal L Benowitz; Jasjit S Ahluwalia
Journal:  Nicotine Tob Res       Date:  2018-01-05       Impact factor: 4.244

10.  Electronic cigarette exposure disrupts blood-brain barrier integrity and promotes neuroinflammation.

Authors:  Nathan A Heldt; Alecia Seliga; Malika Winfield; Sachin Gajghate; Nancy Reichenbach; Xiang Yu; Slava Rom; Amogha Tenneti; Dana May; Brian D Gregory; Yuri Persidsky
Journal:  Brain Behav Immun       Date:  2020-03-31       Impact factor: 7.217

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.