Literature DB >> 22352228

Role of MRI in the evaluation of acoustic schwannoma and its comparison to histopathological findings.

S Haque1, A Hossain, M A Quddus, M U Jahan.   

Abstract

Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) has been the primary imaging modality and has revolutionized the imaging of brain tumors. MRI can display accurate multi planer imaging without interfering of adjacent structures specially for posterior fossa mass lesion. MRI is the imaging modality of choice for cerebollo-pontine (CP) angle Schwannoma. The study was performed to determine, the diagnostic accuracy of MRI in the evaluation of intracranial extra axial CP angle Schwannoma. MRI scan of brain was done on 42 consecutively selected patients referred for the evaluation of CP Acoustic Schwannoma. The age range from 21-60 years and the mean age was 42.85 (+/- 9.5) years. Highest incidence of cerebollo-pontine angle (CPA) mass were found 42.86% in 41-50 age group of patients. Male and Female ratio was 1.083:1. The most common presenting feature of the patients with CP angle Acoustic Schwannoma were headache 90.48%. Acoustic Schwannoma is T1 hypointense 100%, T2 hyper intense 84.61% and heterogeneously hyper intense 92.30% in FLAIR image. After giving contrast agents, homogeneous enhancement 57.69% and heterogeneous 42.31% cases of Acoustic Schwannoma. Overall 61.54% Acoustic Schwannoma strong contrast enhancement was observed. Dural tail was observed in 26.92% cases. Perilesional edema was observed 38.46% cases. Mass effect was observed in 76.92%. After complete MRI evaluation 61.9% had Acoustic Schwannoma. Histopathologicaly proved cases showed out of all patients Acoustic Schwannoma 59.52%. The overall sensitivity of MRI to diagnose Acoustic Schwannoma were found, Sensitivity- 96%, Specificity- 88.2%, PPV-92.31%, NPV-93.75% and Acceuracy 92.86%. Test is significant with p < 0.0001 level. It is conceivable that MRI is a highly accurate, sensitive and Gadolinium enhanced MRI is more sensitive in detection of acoustic Schwannoma. MR imaging is the study of choice for the examination of the patient of cerebellopontine angle Schwannoma because of its high sensitivity specially after use of contrast material.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22352228     DOI: 10.3329/bmrcb.v37i3.9120

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Bangladesh Med Res Counc Bull        ISSN: 0377-9238


  7 in total

1.  Cost-effectiveness analysis of a non-contrast screening MRI protocol for vestibular schwannoma in patients with asymmetric sensorineural hearing loss.

Authors:  Matthew G Crowson; Daniel J Rocke; Jenny K Hoang; Jane L Weissman; David M Kaylie
Journal:  Neuroradiology       Date:  2017-06-16       Impact factor: 2.804

2.  Role of magnetic resonance imaging in evaluation of cerebellopontine angle schwannomas.

Authors:  Kunwarpal Singh; Mohit Preet Singh; Cl Thukral; Kiran Rao; Kulvinder Singh; Amandeep Singh
Journal:  Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2014-06-24

3.  Imaging features and classification of peritumoral edema in vestibular schwannoma.

Authors:  Mario Giordano; Venelin Gerganov; Hussam Metwali; Massimo Gallieni; Madjid Samii; Amir Samii
Journal:  Neuroradiol J       Date:  2019-12-16

4.  CT- and MRI-based gross target volume comparison in vestibular schwannomas.

Authors:  Bhudevi Soubhagya N Kulkarni; Harjot Bajwa; Mukka Chandrashekhar; Sunil Dutt Sharma; Rohith Singareddy; Dileep Gudipudi; Shabbir Ahmad; Alok Kumar; N V N Madusudan Sresty; Alluri Krishnam Raju
Journal:  Rep Pract Oncol Radiother       Date:  2017-04-22

5.  Stereotactic radiosurgery for vestibular schwannoma: International Stereotactic Radiosurgery Society (ISRS) Practice Guideline.

Authors:  May N Tsao; Arjun Sahgal; Wei Xu; Antonio De Salles; Motohiro Hayashi; Marc Levivier; Lijun Ma; Roberto Martinez; Jean Régis; Sam Ryu; Ben J Slotman; Ian Paddick
Journal:  J Radiosurg SBRT       Date:  2017

6.  Surgical management for large vestibular schwannomas: a systematic review, meta-analysis, and consensus statement on behalf of the EANS skull base section.

Authors:  Daniele Starnoni; Lorenzo Giammattei; Giulia Cossu; Michael J Link; Pierre-Hugues Roche; Ari G Chacko; Kenji Ohata; Majid Samii; Ashish Suri; Michael Bruneau; Jan F Cornelius; Luigi Cavallo; Torstein R Meling; Sebastien Froelich; Marcos Tatagiba; Albert Sufianov; Dimitrios Paraskevopoulos; Idoya Zazpe; Moncef Berhouma; Emmanuel Jouanneau; Jeroen B Verheul; Constantin Tuleasca; Mercy George; Marc Levivier; Mahmoud Messerer; Roy Thomas Daniel
Journal:  Acta Neurochir (Wien)       Date:  2020-07-29       Impact factor: 2.216

7.  Evaluation of schwannoma using the 3D-SPACE sequence: comparison with the 3D-CISS sequence in 3T-MRI

Authors:  Enes Gürün; İsmail Akdulum; Pınar Kılıç; Nil Tokgöz; Murat Uçar
Journal:  Turk J Med Sci       Date:  2021-06-28       Impact factor: 0.973

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.