Literature DB >> 22352164

Invasive Microstegium populations consistently outperform native range populations across diverse environments.

S Luke Flory1, Furong Long, Keith Clay.   

Abstract

Plant species introduced into novel ranges may become invasive due to evolutionary change, phenotypic plasticity, or other biotic or abiotic mechanisms. Evolution of introduced populations could be the result of founder effects, drift, hybridization, or adaptation to local conditions, which could enhance the invasiveness of introduced species. However, understanding whether the success of invading populations is due to genetic differences between native and introduced populations may be obscured by origin x environment interactions. That is, studies conducted under a limited set of environmental conditions may show inconsistent results if native or introduced populations are differentially adapted to specific conditions. We tested for genetic differences between native and introduced populations, and for origin x environment interactions, between native (China) and introduced (U.S.) populations of the invasive annual grass Microstegium vimineum (stiltgrass) across 22 common gardens spanning a wide range of habitats and environmental conditions. On average, introduced populations produced 46% greater biomass and had 7.4% greater survival, and outperformed native range populations in every common garden. However, we found no evidence that introduced Microstegium exhibited greater phenotypic plasticity than native populations. Biomass of Microstegium was positively correlated with light and resident community richness and biomass across the common gardens. However, these relationships were equivalent for native and introduced populations, suggesting that the greater mean performance of introduced populations is not due to unequal responses to specific environmental parameters. Our data on performance of invasive and native populations suggest that post-introduction evolutionary changes may have enhanced the invasive potential of this species. Further, the ability of Microstegium to survive and grow across the wide variety of environmental conditions demonstrates that few habitats are immune to invasion.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22352164     DOI: 10.1890/11-0363.1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ecology        ISSN: 0012-9658            Impact factor:   5.499


  7 in total

1.  Evolutionary increases in defense during a biological invasion.

Authors:  Zhi-Yong Liao; Yu-Long Zheng; Yan-Bao Lei; Yu-Long Feng
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2013-12-11       Impact factor: 3.225

2.  Specialist Insect Herbivore and Light Availability Do Not Interact in the Evolution of an Invasive Plant.

Authors:  Zhijie Zhang; Xiaoyun Pan; Ziyan Zhang; Kate S He; Bo Li
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-09-25       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  Evolution of invasive traits in nonindigenous species: increased survival and faster growth in invasive populations of rusty crayfish (Orconectes rusticus).

Authors:  Lindsey W Sargent; David M Lodge
Journal:  Evol Appl       Date:  2014-08-27       Impact factor: 5.183

4.  An experimental test of the EICA Hypothesis in multiple ranges: invasive populations outperform those from the native range independent of insect herbivore suppression.

Authors:  Evan Siemann; Saara J DeWalt; Jianwen Zou; William E Rogers
Journal:  AoB Plants       Date:  2016-12-30       Impact factor: 3.276

5.  Declining survival across invasion history for Microstegium vimineum.

Authors:  Chelsea E Cunard; Richard A Lankau
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-08-15       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  A test for pre-adapted phenotypic plasticity in the invasive tree Acer negundo L.

Authors:  Laurent J Lamarque; Annabel J Porté; Camille Eymeric; Jean-Baptiste Lasnier; Christopher J Lortie; Sylvain Delzon
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-09-09       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Differences in competitive ability between plants from nonnative and native populations of a tropical invader relates to adaptive responses in abiotic and biotic environments.

Authors:  Zhi-Yong Liao; Ru Zhang; Gregor F Barclay; Yu-Long Feng
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-08-16       Impact factor: 3.240

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.