Literature DB >> 22351534

The current practice of the management of little finger metacarpal fractures--a review of the literature and results of a survey conducted among upper limb surgeons in the United Kingdom.

A Sahu1, S S Gujral, S Batra, S P Mills, M S Srinivasan.   

Abstract

Little finger metacarpal fractures are the most common type of metacarpal fractures and the treatment is quite variable as it is a multifactorial entity comprised of subcapital, metacarpal shaft and base fractures. These fractures are common presentations in the fracture clinics and the general orthopaedic surgeons treat them until a complex case warrants specific decision making by a hand surgeon. The management of many of these fractures is still a matter of debate and differ widely in the various parts of the United Kingdom. The aim of this study was to investigate the current practice of little finger metacarpal fractures among upper limb surgeons in the UK. We conducted an online survey among 278 upper limb orthopaedic specialist surgeons throughout the UK. Our response rate was 58%. There are various factors which dictate the treatment as suggested by these respondent upper limb consultants. For example, for fifth metacarpal neck fractures, it was generally recognised that 43% of upper limb surgeons prefer neighbour strapping alone for non-operative management of little finger metacarpal fractures. For little finger metacarpal shaft fractures, 39.3% of surgeons suggested that they would contemplate intervention, i.e. manipulation under anaesthesia/surgery if beyond 30° of volar angulation is present. For little finger metacarpal neck fractures, 33.7% would only consider surgical intervention beyond 60° of volar angulation. 91.6% of upper limb specialists agreed that they would operate on little finger metacarpal base fractures only if it was a fracture dislocation, while 71.8% suggested that they would proceed to operate on even a pure dislocation. We have illustrated the various permutations and combinations of these fractures with the results of our survey in this article in detail. The vast majority of metacarpal bone fractures are stable and treated conservatively. The different types of injury patterns must be recognised by the orthopaedic surgeons and appropriate treatment then should be executed to serve the patient optimally in due course.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22351534     DOI: 10.1142/S0218810412500098

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hand Surg        ISSN: 0218-8104


  5 in total

1.  Small Finger Metacarpal Shaft Wedged between Ring and Small Metacarpal Bases: a Report of 2 Cases.

Authors:  Frans J Mulder; Mariano E Menendez; David Ring
Journal:  Arch Bone Jt Surg       Date:  2014-10-15

2.  A comparison of the functional and radiological results of Paris plaster cast and ulnar gutter splint in the conservative treatment of fractures of the fifth metacarpal.

Authors:  Deniz Gulabi; Cem Coskun Avci; Gultekin Sıtkı Cecen; Halil Ibrahim Bekler; Fevzi Saglam; Erdogan Merih
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2013-08-10

Review 3.  Open reduction and internal fixation versus percutaneous transverse Kirschner wire fixation for single, closed second to fifth metacarpal shaft fractures: a systematic review.

Authors:  A P A Greeven; S Bezstarosti; P Krijnen; I B Schipper
Journal:  Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg       Date:  2015-03-14       Impact factor: 3.693

4.  Effect of oblique headless compression screw fixation for metacarpal shaft fracture: a biomechanical in vitro study.

Authors:  Yung-Cheng Chiu; Tsung-Yu Ho; Yen-Nien Ting; Ming-Tzu Tsai; Heng-Li Huang; Cheng-En Hsu; Jui-Ting Hsu
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2021-02-05       Impact factor: 2.362

5.  Are We Over Treating Hand Fractures? Current Practice of Single Metacarpal Fractures.

Authors:  Helene Retrouvey; Alexander Morzycki; Annie M Q Wang; Paul Binhammer
Journal:  Plast Surg (Oakv)       Date:  2018-04-24       Impact factor: 0.947

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.