Literature DB >> 22350921

Differences in patient reports on the quality of care in a diabetes pay-for-performance program between 1 year enrolled and newly enrolled patients.

Pei-Ching Chen1, Yue-Chune Lee, Raymond Nienchen Kuo.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to assess the quality of care from the perspective of patients who participated in the diabetes pay-for-performance (P4P) program in Taiwan.
DESIGN: A cross-sectional telephone interview to measure the quality of care for patients with diabetes mellitus.
SETTING: A stratified sampling according to the level and region of the health-care providers in Taiwan. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 1796 patients with diabetes mellitus responded to the telephone survey.
INTERVENTIONS: The patients were divided into two groups according to the length of time they had participated in the program: (1) the case group, who had received comprehensive care for at least 1 year and (2) the control group, who were newly enrolled in the diabetes mellitus P4P program for <3 months. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The compliance of diabetes self-care and the level of satisfaction with the quality of care from the perspective of the patients.
RESULTS: After controlling for the characteristics of the health-care providers involved, pattern of diabetes treatment, self-reported health status and other patient characteristics, the case group performed better in exercise, had regular medication and better foot care and showed overall compliance with diabetes self-care and perceived better quality of care than the control group.
CONCLUSIONS: The patients who had received comprehensive care for 1 year showed better compliance with self-care and were more satisfied with the quality of care they had received. The P4P program appears to be associated with this enhanced care.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22350921     DOI: 10.1093/intqhc/mzr091

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Qual Health Care        ISSN: 1353-4505            Impact factor:   2.038


  7 in total

1.  Effects of Changes in Diabetes Pay-for-Performance Incentive Designs on Patient Risk Selection.

Authors:  Hui-Min Hsieh; Shu-Ling Tsai; Lih-Wen Mau; Herng-Chia Chiu
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2015-07-07       Impact factor: 3.402

2.  Is a diabetes pay-for-performance program cost-effective under the National Health Insurance in Taiwan?

Authors:  Elise Chia-Hui Tan; Raoh-Fang Pwu; Duan-Rung Chen; Ming-Chin Yang
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2013-08-23       Impact factor: 4.147

Review 3.  The evolution of Taiwan's National Health Insurance drug reimbursement scheme.

Authors:  Jason C Hsu; Christine Y Lu
Journal:  Daru       Date:  2015-02-10       Impact factor: 3.117

4.  Pay for performance program reduces treatment needed diabetic retinopathy - a nationwide matched cohort study in Taiwan.

Authors:  Shwu-Jiuan Sheu; Wen-Liang Lin; Yea-Huei Kao Yang; Chi-Min Hwu; Ching-Lan Cheng
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2018-08-15       Impact factor: 2.655

5.  The effect of pay-for-performance program on infection events and mortality rate in diabetic patients: a nationwide population-based cohort study.

Authors:  Yi-Fang Wu; Mei-Yen Chen; Tien-Hsing Chen; Po-Chang Wang; Yun-Shing Peng; Ming-Shyan Lin
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2021-01-21       Impact factor: 2.655

6.  Pay-for-performance: impact on diabetes.

Authors:  Tim Doran; Evangelos Kontopantelis
Journal:  Curr Diab Rep       Date:  2013-04       Impact factor: 4.810

7.  Diabetes Shared Care Program (DSCP) and risk of infection mortality: a nationwide cohort study using administrative claims data in Taiwan.

Authors:  Chorng-Kuang How; Ming-Shun Hsieh; Cheng-Han Chen; Sheng-Hsiang Ma; Sung-Yuan Hu; Chia-Ming Chang; Jen-Huai Chiang; Vivian Chia-Rong Hsieh; David Hung-Tsang Yen
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2018-07-12       Impact factor: 2.692

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.