Literature DB >> 22350558

Strategies for chromium bioremediation of tannery effluent.

Satyendra Kumar Garg1, Manikant Tripathi, Thiruneelakantan Srinath.   

Abstract

Bioremediation offers the possibility of using living organisms (bacteria, fungi, algae,or plants), but primarily microorganisms, to degrade or remove environmental contaminants, and transform them into nontoxic or less-toxic forms. The major advantages of bioremediation over conventional physicochemical and biological treatment methods include low cost, good efficiency, minimization of chemicals, reduced quantity of secondary sludge, regeneration of cell biomass, and the possibility of recover-ing pollutant metals. Leather industries, which extensively employ chromium compounds in the tanning process, discharge spent-chromium-laden effluent into nearby water bodies. Worldwide, chromium is known to be one of the most common inorganic contaminants of groundwater at pollutant hazardous sites. Hexavalent chromium poses a health risk to all forms of life. Bioremediation of chromium extant in tannery waste involves different strategies that include biosorption, bioaccumulation,bioreduction, and immobilization of biomaterial(s). Biosorption is a nondirected physiochemical interaction that occurs between metal species and the cellular components of biological species. It is metabolism-dependent when living biomass is employed, and metabolism-independent in dead cell biomass. Dead cell biomass is much more effective than living cell biomass at biosorping heavy metals, including chromium. Bioaccumulation is a metabolically active process in living organisms that works through adsorption, intracellular accumulation, and bioprecipitation mechanisms. In bioreduction processes, microorganisms alter the oxidation/reduction state of toxic metals through direct or indirect biological and chemical process(es).Bioreduction of Cr6+ to Cr3+ not only decreases the chromium toxicity to living organisms, but also helps precipitate chromium at a neutral pH for further physical removal,thus offering promise as a bioremediation strategy. However, biosorption, bioaccumulation, and bioreduction methods that rely on free cells for bioremediation suffer from Cr6 toxicity, and cell damage. Therefore, immobilization of microbial cell biomass enhances bioremediation and renders industrial bioremediation processes more economically viable from reduced free-cells toxicity, easier separation of biosorbents from the tannery effluent, ability to achieve multiple biosorption cycles, and desorption (elution) of metal(s) from matrices for reuse. Thus, microbial bioremediation can be a cost competitive strategy and beneficial bioresource for removing many hazardous contaminants from tannery and other industrial wastes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22350558     DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4614-2329-4_2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Rev Environ Contam Toxicol        ISSN: 0179-5953            Impact factor:   7.563


  9 in total

1.  Chromium (VI) remediation by a native strain: effect of environmental conditions and removal mechanisms involved.

Authors:  Paola S González; Laura F Ambrosio; Cintia E Paisio; Melina A Talano; María I Medina; Elizabeth Agostini
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2014-07-16       Impact factor: 4.223

2.  Improved Sprouting and Growth of Mung Plants in Chromate Contaminated Soils Treated with Marine Strains of Staphylococcus Species.

Authors:  Elroy J Pereira; Suzana Fonseca; Ram M Meena; Nagappa Ramaiah
Journal:  Indian J Microbiol       Date:  2017-08-08       Impact factor: 2.461

3.  Dechlorination of chloroorganics, decolorization, and simultaneous bioremediation of Cr6+ from real tannery effluent employing indigenous Bacillus cereus isolate.

Authors:  Manikant Tripathi; Satyendra Kumar Garg
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2014-01-05       Impact factor: 4.223

4.  Biochemical and molecular mechanisms involved in simultaneous phenol and Cr(VI) removal by Acinetobacter guillouiae SFC 500-1A.

Authors:  Ornella M Ontañon; Paola S González; Elizabeth Agostini
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2015-04-29       Impact factor: 4.223

5.  Isolation and characterization of chromium(VI)-reducing bacteria from tannery effluents and solid wastes.

Authors:  Mohammad Mahbub Kabir; Abu Naieum Muhammad Fakhruddin; Muhammed Alamgir Zaman Chowdhury; Md Kamruzzaman Pramanik; Zeenath Fardous
Journal:  World J Microbiol Biotechnol       Date:  2018-08-06       Impact factor: 3.312

6.  Pentachlorophenol dechlorination and simultaneous Cr6+ reduction by Pseudomonas putida SKG-1 MTCC (10510): characterization of PCP dechlorination products, bacterial structure, and functional groups.

Authors:  Satyendra Kumar Garg; Manikant Tripathi; Santosh Kumar Singh; Anamika Singh
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2012-08-05       Impact factor: 4.223

7.  Optimization of chromium and tannic acid bioremediation by Aspergillus niveus using Plackett-Burman design and response surface methodology.

Authors:  Prachi Chaudhary; Vinod Chhokar; Pragati Choudhary; Anil Kumar; Vikas Beniwal
Journal:  AMB Express       Date:  2017-11-14       Impact factor: 3.298

Review 8.  Health hazards of hexavalent chromium (Cr (VI)) and its microbial reduction.

Authors:  Pooja Sharma; Surendra Pratap Singh; Sheetal Kishor Parakh; Yen Wah Tong
Journal:  Bioengineered       Date:  2022-03       Impact factor: 3.269

Review 9.  Recent Strategies for Bioremediation of Emerging Pollutants: A Review for a Green and Sustainable Environment.

Authors:  Saroj Bala; Diksha Garg; Banjagere Veerabhadrappa Thirumalesh; Minaxi Sharma; Kandi Sridhar; Baskaran Stephen Inbaraj; Manikant Tripathi
Journal:  Toxics       Date:  2022-08-19
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.