Literature DB >> 22350344

Effect of different soil layers on porewater to remediate acidic surface environment at a close mine site.

Omar R Salinas Villafane1, Toshifumi Igarashi, Shusaku Harada, Mitsuru Kurosawa, Toshio Takase.   

Abstract

This paper describes the chemistry of porewater when constructing different soil layers on acidic weathered rock of a closed mine to remediate the surface environment. Three cases were set on a flat surface of the site, all under different layer systems. Case 1 was only composed of weathered rocks. A top neutralization layer was constructed on the weathered rocks in case 2, whereas both an upper low-permeable and middle neutralization layers were constructed on the weathered rocks in case 3. The low-permeable layer of 30 cm thick consists of clay, and the neutralization layer of 30 cm thick consists of the mixture of the weathered rock and calcium carbonate as a neutralizer. Porewater sampling systems and soil sensors to measure temperature, water content, and electrical conductivity were set at different depths. In case 1, steadily high concentrations of heavy metals were observed regardless of the depth, and the pH ranged from 2 to 4. In cases 2 and 3, a dramatic decrease in concentrations of heavy metals was observed, even below the neutralization layer. For both cases, pH values were circumneutral. There were no significant seasonable changes in heavy metals concentrations and pH of porewater by considering the temperature and precipitation. In addition, the water content of the layers in case 3 fluctuated more mildly than that in cases 1 and 2, indicating that the low-permeable layer reduced the rate of infiltration. Therefore, a significant reduction in the load of heavy metals released from the site can be achieved by both implementing neutralization and low-permeable layers.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22350344     DOI: 10.1007/s10661-012-2526-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Monit Assess        ISSN: 0167-6369            Impact factor:   2.513


  8 in total

Review 1.  Soil quality assessment under emerging regulatory requirements.

Authors:  James Bone; Martin Head; Declan Barraclough; Michael Archer; Catherine Scheib; Dee Flight; Nikolaos Voulvoulis
Journal:  Environ Int       Date:  2010-05-18       Impact factor: 9.621

2.  Evaluation of in situ layers for treatment of acid mine drainage: a field comparison.

Authors:  Andrea H M Hulshof; David W Blowes; W Douglas Gould
Journal:  Water Res       Date:  2006-04-19       Impact factor: 11.236

Review 3.  Soil washing for metal removal: a review of physical/chemical technologies and field applications.

Authors:  G Dermont; M Bergeron; G Mercier; M Richer-Laflèche
Journal:  J Hazard Mater       Date:  2007-10-22       Impact factor: 10.588

4.  Remediation measures and displacement of pollutants in soils affected by the spill of a pyrite mine.

Authors:  M Simón; I García; F Martín; M Díez; F del Moral; J A Sánchez
Journal:  Sci Total Environ       Date:  2008-10-21       Impact factor: 7.963

Review 5.  The longevity of minewater pollution: a basis for decision-making.

Authors:  P L Younger
Journal:  Sci Total Environ       Date:  1997-02-24       Impact factor: 7.963

6.  Evaluation of chemical immobilization treatments for reducing heavy metal transport in a smelter-contaminated soil.

Authors:  N T Basta; S L McGowen
Journal:  Environ Pollut       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 8.071

7.  Mechanisms of arsenic and lead release from hydrothermally altered rock.

Authors:  C B Tabelin; T Igarashi
Journal:  J Hazard Mater       Date:  2009-04-19       Impact factor: 10.588

8.  Field evaluation of in situ remediation of a heavy metal contaminated soil using lime and red-mud.

Authors:  C W Gray; S J Dunham; P G Dennis; F J Zhao; S P McGrath
Journal:  Environ Pollut       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 8.071

  8 in total
  1 in total

1.  Performance assessment of a single-layer moisture store-and-release cover system at a mine waste rock pile in a seasonally humid region (Nova Scotia, Canada).

Authors:  Christopher Power; Murugan Ramasamy; Martin Mkandawire
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2018-03-03       Impact factor: 2.513

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.