Literature DB >> 22350254

Moxifloxacin versus placebo modeling of the QT interval.

Philippe Grosjean1, Saïk Urien.   

Abstract

The objectives were to develop a population model for placebo-corrected moxifloxacin QT interval in healthy subjects using non-linear mixed effects modeling and to examine effect of covariates on the observed QT. Based on the parameters of interest, optimizations of observation times and number of subjects were proposed. A pool of four thorough QT studies was used, representing 99 subjects receiving placebo and moxifloxacin. The data was modeled using Monolix. The placebo effect on QT was satisfactorily described using a 2-oscillator model. It reflected the circadian rhythm variability which is taken into account when assessing the time-matched mean difference on QT between treatment and baseline. Based on this model, the moxifloxacin effect on QT was satisfactorily described by the same equation with the adjunct of a direct and proportional drug concentration-effect. The Emax model provided the best description of the effect. The unique covariate was gender for both baseline QTc and individual heart rate correction factor. The present design included up to 16 observations for pharmacodynamics. Using this model, 9 observation times for pharmacodynamics provided satisfactory estimates for the parameters of interest (Emax). With 15% precision limit on Emax, 60 subjects was optimal. The simultaneous placebo-moxifloxacin QT model proposed is an interesting alternative to the ICH E14 guideline in assessing QT prolongation effect. This approach provides accurate information over a range of concentrations using different relationships (slope or Emax models) to quantify the drug-response relationship versus placebo. This allowed optimizing the observation times and number of subjects.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22350254     DOI: 10.1007/s10928-012-9242-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Pharmacokinet Pharmacodyn        ISSN: 1567-567X            Impact factor:   2.745


  17 in total

1.  The influence of age and gender on the pharmacokinetics of moxifloxacin.

Authors:  J T Sullivan; J T Lettieri; P Liu; A H Heller
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 6.447

2.  Implementation of a transit compartment model for describing drug absorption in pharmacokinetic studies.

Authors:  Radojka M Savic; Daniël M Jonker; Thomas Kerbusch; Mats O Karlsson
Journal:  J Pharmacokinet Pharmacodyn       Date:  2007-07-26       Impact factor: 2.745

3.  Chronobiological analysis techniques. Application to blood pressure.

Authors:  J R Fernández; R C Hermida; A Mojón
Journal:  Philos Trans A Math Phys Eng Sci       Date:  2009-01-28       Impact factor: 4.226

4.  Accurately measured and properly heart-rate corrected QTc intervals show little daytime variability.

Authors:  Marek Malik; Katerina Hnatkova; Anna Schmidt; Peter Smetana
Journal:  Heart Rhythm       Date:  2008-07-26       Impact factor: 6.343

5.  Near-thorough QT study as part of a first-in-man study.

Authors:  Marek Malik; Katerina Hnatkova; John Ford; David Madge
Journal:  J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2008-08-29       Impact factor: 3.126

6.  Is a thorough QTc study necessary? The role of modeling and simulation in evaluating the QTc prolongation potential of drugs.

Authors:  Shashank Rohatagi; Timothy J Carrothers; Jon Kuwabara-Wagg; Tatiana Khariton
Journal:  J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2009-09-04       Impact factor: 3.126

7.  Design evaluation and optimisation in multiple response nonlinear mixed effect models: PFIM 3.0.

Authors:  Caroline Bazzoli; Sylvie Retout; France Mentré
Journal:  Comput Methods Programs Biomed       Date:  2009-11-04       Impact factor: 5.428

8.  Circadian rhythm of the corrected QT interval: impact of different heart rate correction models.

Authors:  Peter Smetana; Velislav Batchvarov; Katerina Hnatkova; A John Camm; Marek Malik
Journal:  Pacing Clin Electrophysiol       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 1.976

9.  Methods for cosinor-rhythmometry.

Authors:  W Nelson; Y L Tong; J K Lee; F Halberg
Journal:  Chronobiologia       Date:  1979 Oct-Dec

10.  Reevaluation of moxifloxacin pharmacokinetics and their direct effect on the QT interval.

Authors:  Philippe Grosjean; Saïk Urien
Journal:  J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2011-03-17       Impact factor: 3.126

View more
  9 in total

1.  Estimation of QT interval prolongation through model-averaging.

Authors:  Peter L Bonate
Journal:  J Pharmacokinet Pharmacodyn       Date:  2017-04-18       Impact factor: 2.745

2.  Assessing QT/QTc interval prolongation with concentration-QT modeling for Phase I studies: impact of computational platforms, model structures and confidence interval calculation methods.

Authors:  Jingtao Lu; Jianguo Li; Gabriel Helmlinger; Nidal Al-Huniti
Journal:  J Pharmacokinet Pharmacodyn       Date:  2018-03-19       Impact factor: 2.745

Review 3.  The role of concentration-effect relationships in the assessment of QTc interval prolongation.

Authors:  Nicholas P France; Oscar Della Pasqua
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2015-01       Impact factor: 4.335

4.  Pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic analysis to evaluate the effect of moxifloxacin on QT interval prolongation in healthy Korean male subjects.

Authors:  Taegon Hong; Seunghoon Han; Jongtae Lee; Sangil Jeon; Gab-Jin Park; Wan-Su Park; Kyoung Soo Lim; Jae-Yong Chung; Kyung-Sang Yu; Dong-Seok Yim
Journal:  Drug Des Devel Ther       Date:  2015-02-26       Impact factor: 4.162

5.  Concentration-QT Modeling Following Inhalation of the Novel Inhaled Phosphodiesterase-4 Inhibitor CHF6001 in Healthy Volunteers Shows an Absence of QT Prolongation.

Authors:  Koen Jolling; Angela Äbelö; Nicolas Luyckx; Marie-Anna Nandeuil; Mirco Govoni; Massimo Cella; Andreas Lindauer
Journal:  CPT Pharmacometrics Syst Pharmacol       Date:  2019-05-11

6.  Evaluation of QT Liability for PF-05251749 in the Presence of Potential Circadian Rhythm Modification.

Authors:  Yeamin Huh; Danny Chen; Steve Riley; Cheng Chang; Timothy Nicholas
Journal:  CPT Pharmacometrics Syst Pharmacol       Date:  2019-12-25

7.  Assessment of Interspecies Differences in Drug-Induced QTc Interval Prolongation in Cynomolgus Monkeys, Dogs and Humans.

Authors:  V F S Dubois; W E A de Witte; S A G Visser; M Danhof; O Della Pasqua
Journal:  Pharm Res       Date:  2015-11-09       Impact factor: 4.200

8.  Evaluating the Use of Linear Mixed-Effect Models for Inference of the Concentration-QTc Slope Estimate as a Surrogate for a Biological QTc Model.

Authors:  Y Huh; M M Hutmacher
Journal:  CPT Pharmacometrics Syst Pharmacol       Date:  2015-01-28

Review 9.  Evaluating cardiac risk: exposure response analysis in early clinical drug development.

Authors:  Julie Grenier; Sabina Paglialunga; Bruce H Morimoto; Robert M Lester
Journal:  Drug Healthc Patient Saf       Date:  2018-04-18
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.