Literature DB >> 22349648

Baseline mood-state measures as predictors of antidepressant response to scopolamine.

Maura L Furey1, Allison C Nugent, Andrew M Speer, David A Luckenbaugh, Elana M Hoffman, Erica Frankel, Wayne C Drevets, Carlos A Zarate.   

Abstract

Identifying predictors of antidepressant response will facilitate the successful treatment of patients suffering from depression. Scopolamine produces robust antidepressant responses in unipolar and bipolar depression. Here we evaluate the potential for baseline self-ratings to predict treatment response to scopolamine. Fifty-one unipolar and bipolar patients participated in a double-blind, placebo-controlled crossover trial. Following a single-blind placebo session, participants randomly received P/S or S/P (P=3 placebo; S=3 scopolamine (4μg/kg) sessions). Mood-state self-ratings (Profile of Mood State (POMS) and Visual Analog Scales (VAS)) and depression severity (Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS)) were obtained before each infusion. Day 1 (baseline/placebo) self-ratings were used in a discriminant function analysis to identify linear combinations of individual items that predict response. The discriminant analysis significantly separated responders from non-responders in both the unipolar and bipolar diagnostic subgroups. The discriminant functions accurately classified over 85% of patients as responders/non-responders. The POMS depression subscale significantly correlated with clinical response, as did the VAS restlessness, sad, and irritated scales. These results indicate that self-report mood-ratings obtained before treatment can predict response outcome to scopolamine, and suggest that a constellation of mood-state features may be related to clinical response. Published by Elsevier Ireland Ltd.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22349648      PMCID: PMC3464046          DOI: 10.1016/j.psychres.2012.01.003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychiatry Res        ISSN: 0165-1781            Impact factor:   3.222


  30 in total

1.  The assessment of anxiety states by rating.

Authors:  M HAMILTON
Journal:  Br J Med Psychol       Date:  1959

2.  Relative sensitivity of the Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale, the Hamilton Depression rating scale and the Clinical Global Impressions rating scale in antidepressant clinical trials.

Authors:  A Khan; S R Khan; E B Shankles; N L Polissar
Journal:  Int Clin Psychopharmacol       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 1.659

3.  Tricyclic nonresponders: phenomenology and treatment.

Authors:  S P Roose; A H Glassman; B T Walsh; S Woodring
Journal:  Am J Psychiatry       Date:  1986-03       Impact factor: 18.112

4.  Major depressive subtypes and treatment response.

Authors:  M Fava; L A Uebelacker; J E Alpert; A A Nierenberg; J A Pava; J F Rosenbaum
Journal:  Biol Psychiatry       Date:  1997-10-01       Impact factor: 13.382

5.  A rating scale for mania: reliability, validity and sensitivity.

Authors:  R C Young; J T Biggs; V E Ziegler; D A Meyer
Journal:  Br J Psychiatry       Date:  1978-11       Impact factor: 9.319

6.  Implicit memory bias in clinical and non-clinical depression.

Authors:  B P Bradley; K Mogg; N Millar
Journal:  Behav Res Ther       Date:  1996 Nov-Dec

7.  Characteristics of desipramine-refractory depression.

Authors:  J C Nelson; C M Mazure; P I Jatlow
Journal:  J Clin Psychiatry       Date:  1994-01       Impact factor: 4.384

Review 8.  Melancholic/endogenous depression and response to somatic treatment and placebo.

Authors:  E D Peselow; M P Sanfilipo; C Difiglia; R R Fieve
Journal:  Am J Psychiatry       Date:  1992-10       Impact factor: 18.112

9.  Columbia atypical depression. A subgroup of depressives with better response to MAOI than to tricyclic antidepressants or placebo.

Authors:  F M Quitkin; J W Stewart; P J McGrath; E Tricamo; J G Rabkin; K Ocepek-Welikson; E Nunes; W Harrison; D F Klein
Journal:  Br J Psychiatry Suppl       Date:  1993-09

10.  Lower hippocampal volume in patients suffering from depression: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Stephanie Campbell; Michael Marriott; Claude Nahmias; Glenda M MacQueen
Journal:  Am J Psychiatry       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 18.112

View more
  15 in total

1.  The ability of volumetric capnography to distinguish between chronic obstructive pulmonary disease patients and normal subjects.

Authors:  Guang-Sheng Qi; Wen-Chao Gu; Wen-Lan Yang; Feng Xi; Hao Wu; Jin-Ming Liu
Journal:  Lung       Date:  2014-07-15       Impact factor: 2.584

2.  The placebo effect and its clinical associations in gambling disorder.

Authors:  Jon E Grant; Samuel R Chamberlain
Journal:  Ann Clin Psychiatry       Date:  2017-08       Impact factor: 1.567

3.  Clinical predictors of ketamine response in treatment-resistant major depression.

Authors:  Mark J Niciu; David A Luckenbaugh; Dawn F Ionescu; Sara Guevara; Rodrigo Machado-Vieira; Erica M Richards; Nancy E Brutsche; Neal M Nolan; Carlos A Zarate
Journal:  J Clin Psychiatry       Date:  2014-05       Impact factor: 4.384

4.  Ventral tegmental area cholinergic mechanisms mediate behavioral responses in the forced swim test.

Authors:  N A Addy; E J Nunes; R J Wickham
Journal:  Behav Brain Res       Date:  2015-04-09       Impact factor: 3.332

5.  Cortical abnormalities and association with symptom dimensions across the depressive spectrum.

Authors:  Marc S Lener; Prantik Kundu; Edmund Wong; Kaitlin E Dewilde; Cheuk Y Tang; Priti Balchandani; James W Murrough
Journal:  J Affect Disord       Date:  2015-10-30       Impact factor: 4.839

6.  Amygdala response to explicit sad face stimuli at baseline predicts antidepressant treatment response to scopolamine in major depressive disorder.

Authors:  Joanna Szczepanik; Allison C Nugent; Wayne C Drevets; Ashish Khanna; Carlos A Zarate; Maura L Furey
Journal:  Psychiatry Res Neuroimaging       Date:  2016-06-20       Impact factor: 2.376

7.  Potential of pretreatment neural activity in the visual cortex during emotional processing to predict treatment response to scopolamine in major depressive disorder.

Authors:  Maura L Furey; Wayne C Drevets; Elana M Hoffman; Erica Frankel; Andrew M Speer; Carlos A Zarate
Journal:  JAMA Psychiatry       Date:  2013-03       Impact factor: 21.596

8.  Scopolamine rapidly increases mammalian target of rapamycin complex 1 signaling, synaptogenesis, and antidepressant behavioral responses.

Authors:  Bhavya Voleti; Andrea Navarria; Rong-Jian Liu; Mounira Banasr; Nanxin Li; Rose Terwilliger; Gerard Sanacora; Tore Eid; George Aghajanian; Ronald S Duman
Journal:  Biol Psychiatry       Date:  2013-06-14       Impact factor: 13.382

9.  Transient Stimulation with Psychoplastogens Is Sufficient to Initiate Neuronal Growth.

Authors:  Calvin Ly; Alexandra C Greb; Maxemiliano V Vargas; Whitney C Duim; Ana Cristina G Grodzki; Pamela J Lein; David E Olson
Journal:  ACS Pharmacol Transl Sci       Date:  2020-09-11

10.  Pretreatment Differences in BOLD Response to Emotional Faces Correlate with Antidepressant Response to Scopolamine.

Authors:  Maura L Furey; Wayne C Drevets; Joanna Szczepanik; Ashish Khanna; Allison Nugent; Carlos A Zarate
Journal:  Int J Neuropsychopharmacol       Date:  2015-03-28       Impact factor: 5.176

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.