Literature DB >> 22348802

Standardizing the diagnosis of inhalation injury using a descriptive score based on mucosal injury criteria.

Christos Ikonomidis1, Florian Lang, Alexandre Radu, Mette M Berger.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Inhalation injury is an important determinant of outcome in patients with major burns. However the diagnostic criteria remain imprecise, preventing objective comparisons of published data. The aims were to evaluate the utility of an inhalation score based on mucosal injury, while assessing separately the oro-pharyngeal sphere (ENT) and tracheobronchial tree (TB) in patients admitted to the ICU with a suspicion of inhalation injury.
METHODS: Prospective observational study in 100 patients admitted with suspicion of inhalation injury among 168 consecutive burn admissions to the ICU of a university hospital. Inclusion criteria, endoscopic airway assessment during the first hours. ENT/TB lesion grading was 1: oedema, hyperemia, hypersecretion, 2: bullous mucosal detachment, erosion, exudates, 3: profound ulcers, necrosis.
RESULTS: Of the 100 patients (age 42±17 years, burns 23±19%BSA), 79 presented an ENT inhalation injuryENT1 (soot present in 24%): 36 had a tracheobronchial extension, 33 having a grade ≥TB1. Burned vibrissae: 10 patients "without" suffered ENT injury, while 6 patients "with" had no further lesions. Length of mechanical ventilation was strongly associated with the first 24 hrs' fluid resuscitation volume (p<0.0001) and the presence of inhalation injury (p=0.03), while the ICU length of stay was correlated with the %BSA. Soot was associated with prolonged mechanical ventilation (p=0.0115). There was no extubation failure.
CONCLUSIONS: The developed inhalation score was simple to use, providing a unified language, and drawing attention to upper airway involvement. Burned vibrissae and suspected history proved to be insufficient diagnostic criteria. Further studies are required to validate the score in a larger population.
Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Ltd and ISBI. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22348802     DOI: 10.1016/j.burns.2011.11.009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Burns        ISSN: 0305-4179            Impact factor:   2.744


  6 in total

1.  Prophylactic sequential bronchoscopy after inhalation injury: results from a three-year prospective randomized trial.

Authors:  J A Carr; N Crowley
Journal:  Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg       Date:  2013-01-22       Impact factor: 3.693

2.  Comparison of mortality prediction models and validation of SAPS II in critically ill burns patients.

Authors:  O Pantet; M Faouzi; N Brusselaers; A Vernay; M M Berger
Journal:  Ann Burns Fire Disasters       Date:  2016-06-30

3.  Staphylococcus aureus carriage at admission predicts early-onset pneumonia after burn trauma.

Authors:  A Fournier; P Voirol; M Krähenbühl; C-L Bonnemain; C Fournier; E Dupuis-Lozeron; O Pantet; J-L Pagani; J-P Revelly; F Sadeghipour; P Eggimann; Y-A Que
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  2016-11-04       Impact factor: 3.267

4.  Impact of Real-Time Therapeutic Drug Monitoring on the Prescription of Antibiotics in Burn Patients Requiring Admission to the Intensive Care Unit.

Authors:  P Voirol; Y-A Que; A Fournier; P Eggimann; O Pantet; J L Pagani; E Dupuis-Lozeron; A Pannatier; F Sadeghipour
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2018-02-23       Impact factor: 5.191

5.  A survey of current practices in the diagnosis of and interventions for inhalational injuries in Canadian burn centres.

Authors:  Justin K Yeung; Leslie Tze Fung Leung; Anthony Papp
Journal:  Can J Plast Surg       Date:  2013

6.  Quantifying the impact of inhalational burns: a prospective study.

Authors:  Si Jack Chong; Yee Onn Kok; Rosanna Xiang Ying Tay; Desai Suneel Ramesh; Kok Chai Tan; Bien Keem Tan
Journal:  Burns Trauma       Date:  2018-09-04
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.