BACKGROUND:Tapentadol is a mu-opioid receptor agonist and norepinephrine reuptake inhibitor. In clinical trials, tapentadol provided somatic pain relief comparable to mu-opioids such as oxycodone, with significantly less gastrointestinal adverse effects. The acute effects of tapentadol on gastrointestinal and colonic transit are unclear. AIM: To compare acute effects of oral tapentadol and oxycodone on gastric, small bowel and colonic transit of solids in 38 healthy human subjects. METHODS: In a randomised, parallel-group, double-blind, placebo-controlled study of the effects of identical-appearing tapentadol immediate release (IR), 75 mg t.d.s., or oxycodone IR, 5 mg t.d.s., for 48 h, we measured gastric (GE), small bowel (SBT measured as colonic filling at 6 h) and colonic transit by validated scintigraphy. Drug was commenced on the evening before the start of the transit test. The primary endpoints were overall colonic transit (geometric centre, GC) at 24 h and GE half-time (t1/2 ). ancova of transit data included gender or BMI as covariates. Adverse effects were summarised. RESULTS: At the doses tested, oxycodone and tapentadol significantly delayed GE t1/2 and SBT, but not overall colonic transit, compared to placebo. Transit profiles in all regions were not significantly different between oxycodone and tapentadol at the doses tested. Both oxycodone and tapentadol were associated with nausea and central effects attributable to central opiate effects. CONCLUSIONS:Tapentadol significantly delayed gastric emptying t1/2 and small bowel transit, similar to oxycodone. These data suggest that acute administration of tapentadol may not have significant advantages over standard mu-opioids, in terms of the potential to avoid upper gastrointestinal motor dysfunction.
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND:Tapentadol is a mu-opioid receptor agonist and norepinephrine reuptake inhibitor. In clinical trials, tapentadol provided somatic pain relief comparable to mu-opioids such as oxycodone, with significantly less gastrointestinal adverse effects. The acute effects of tapentadol on gastrointestinal and colonic transit are unclear. AIM: To compare acute effects of oral tapentadol and oxycodone on gastric, small bowel and colonic transit of solids in 38 healthy human subjects. METHODS: In a randomised, parallel-group, double-blind, placebo-controlled study of the effects of identical-appearing tapentadol immediate release (IR), 75 mg t.d.s., or oxycodone IR, 5 mg t.d.s., for 48 h, we measured gastric (GE), small bowel (SBT measured as colonic filling at 6 h) and colonic transit by validated scintigraphy. Drug was commenced on the evening before the start of the transit test. The primary endpoints were overall colonic transit (geometric centre, GC) at 24 h and GE half-time (t1/2 ). ancova of transit data included gender or BMI as covariates. Adverse effects were summarised. RESULTS: At the doses tested, oxycodone and tapentadol significantly delayed GE t1/2 and SBT, but not overall colonic transit, compared to placebo. Transit profiles in all regions were not significantly different between oxycodone and tapentadol at the doses tested. Both oxycodone and tapentadol were associated with nausea and central effects attributable to central opiate effects. CONCLUSIONS:Tapentadol significantly delayed gastric emptying t1/2 and small bowel transit, similar to oxycodone. These data suggest that acute administration of tapentadol may not have significant advantages over standard mu-opioids, in terms of the potential to avoid upper gastrointestinal motor dysfunction.
Authors: Michael Camilleri; Henry P Parkman; Mehnaz A Shafi; Thomas L Abell; Lauren Gerson Journal: Am J Gastroenterol Date: 2012-11-13 Impact factor: 10.864
Authors: William L Hasler; Laura A Wilson; Linda A Nguyen; William J Snape; Thomas L Abell; Kenneth L Koch; Richard W McCallum; Pankaj J Pasricha; Irene Sarosiek; Gianrico Farrugia; Madhusudan Grover; Linda A Lee; Laura Miriel; James Tonascia; Frank A Hamilton; Henry P Parkman Journal: Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol Date: 2018-10-13 Impact factor: 11.382
Authors: Michael Camilleri; Braden Kuo; Linda Nguyen; Vida M Vaughn; Jessica Petrey; Katarina Greer; Rena Yadlapati; Thomas L Abell Journal: Am J Gastroenterol Date: 2022-06-03 Impact factor: 12.045
Authors: Christopher M Navas; Erica D Wadas; Natalia H Zbib; Michael D Crowell; Brian E Lacy Journal: Dig Dis Sci Date: 2020-04-18 Impact factor: 3.199
Authors: Yunyun Yuan; Orgil Elbegdorj; Jianyang Chen; Shashidhar K Akubathini; Feng Zhang; David L Stevens; Irina O Beletskaya; Krista L Scoggins; Zhenxian Zhang; Phillip M Gerk; Dana E Selley; Hamid I Akbarali; William L Dewey; Yan Zhang Journal: J Med Chem Date: 2012-11-09 Impact factor: 7.446
Authors: Nalini Vadivelu; Yili Huang; Brian Mirante; Michael Jacoby; Ferne R Braveman; Roberta L Hines; Raymond Sinatra Journal: Drug Healthc Patient Saf Date: 2013-07-03