Literature DB >> 22348243

Reflections on pediatric high-frequency oscillatory ventilation from a physiologic perspective.

Martin C J Kneyber1, Marc van Heerde, Dick G Markhorst.   

Abstract

Mechanical ventilation using low tidal volumes has become universally accepted to prevent ventilator-induced lung injury. High-frequency oscillatory ventilation (HFOV) allows pulmonary gas exchange using very small tidal volume (1-2 mL/kg) with concomitant decreased risk of atelectrauma. However, its use in pediatric critical care varies between only 3% and 30% of all ventilated children. This might be explained by the fact that the beneficial effect of HFOV on patient outcome has not been ascertained. Alternatively, in contrast with present recommendations, one can ask if HFOV has been employed in its most optimal fashion related especially to the indications for and timing of HFOV, as well as to using the best oscillator settings. The first was addressed in one small randomized study showing that early use of HFOV, instead of rescue use, was associated with improved survival. From a physiologic perspective, the oscillator settings could be refined. Lung volume is the main determinant of oxygenation in diffuse alveolar disease, suggesting using an open-lung strategy by recruitment maneuvers, although this is in practice not custom. Using such an approach, the patient can be oscillated on the deflation limb of the pressure-volume (P-V) curve, allowing less pressure required to maintain a certain amount of lung volume. Gas exchange is determined by the frequency and the oscillatory power setting, controlling the magnitude of the membrane displacement. Experimental work as well as preliminary human data have shown that it is possible to achieve the smallest tidal volume with concomitant adequate gas exchange when oscillating at high frequency and high fixed power setting. Future studies are needed to validate these novel approaches and to evaluate their effect on patient outcome. Copyright 2012 Daedalus Enterprises

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22348243     DOI: 10.4187/respcare.01571

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Respir Care        ISSN: 0020-1324            Impact factor:   2.258


  10 in total

1.  Any trial can (almost) kill a good technique.

Authors:  Martin C J Kneyber; Dick G Markhorst
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2016-01-29       Impact factor: 17.440

2.  Noninvasive high-frequency ventilation and the errors from the past: designing simple trials neglecting complex respiratory physiology.

Authors:  Daniele De Luca
Journal:  J Perinatol       Date:  2017-09       Impact factor: 2.521

3.  High-frequency oscillatory ventilation and pediatric cardiac surgery: yes, we can!

Authors:  Martin C J Kneyber
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2011-11-24       Impact factor: 9.097

Review 4.  Ventilator-induced lung injury in children: a reality?

Authors:  Alette A Koopman; Pauline de Jager; Robert G T Blokpoel; Martin C J Kneyber
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2019-10

5.  Infant cardiac magnetic resonance imaging using oscillatory ventilation: safe and effective.

Authors:  Alicia H Chaves; Joseph R Cava; Pippa Simpson; George M Hoffman; Margaret M Samyn
Journal:  Pediatr Cardiol       Date:  2013-01-24       Impact factor: 1.655

6.  Effect of body weight loss on cardiopulmonary function assessed by 6-minute walk test and arterial blood gas analysis in obese dogs.

Authors:  J Manens; R Ricci; C Damoiseaux; S Gault; B Contiero; M Diez; C Clercx
Journal:  J Vet Intern Med       Date:  2013-12-18       Impact factor: 3.333

7.  Recommendations for mechanical ventilation of critically ill children from the Paediatric Mechanical Ventilation Consensus Conference (PEMVECC).

Authors:  Martin C J Kneyber; Daniele de Luca; Edoardo Calderini; Pierre-Henri Jarreau; Etienne Javouhey; Jesus Lopez-Herce; Jürg Hammer; Duncan Macrae; Dick G Markhorst; Alberto Medina; Marti Pons-Odena; Fabrizio Racca; Gerhard Wolf; Paolo Biban; Joe Brierley; Peter C Rimensberger
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2017-09-22       Impact factor: 17.440

Review 8.  Mechanical Ventilation in Pediatric and Neonatal Patients.

Authors:  Michaela Kollisch-Singule; Harry Ramcharran; Joshua Satalin; Sarah Blair; Louis A Gatto; Penny L Andrews; Nader M Habashi; Gary F Nieman; Adel Bougatef
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2022-03-17       Impact factor: 4.566

Review 9.  The Physiological Basis of High-Frequency Oscillatory Ventilation and Current Evidence in Adults and Children: A Narrative Review.

Authors:  Andrew G Miller; Herng Lee Tan; Brian J Smith; Alexandre T Rotta; Jan Hau Lee
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2022-04-26       Impact factor: 4.755

10.  Effect of a new respiratory care bundle on bronchopulmonary dysplasia in preterm neonates.

Authors:  Cristina Ramos-Navarro; Noelia González-Pacheco; Ana Rodríguez-Sánchez de la Blanca; Manuel Sánchez-Luna
Journal:  Eur J Pediatr       Date:  2020-06-02       Impact factor: 3.183

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.