Myelination is a highly regulated developmental process whereby oligodendrocytes in the central nervous system and Schwann cells in the peripheral nervous system ensheathe axons with a multilayered concentric membrane. Axonal myelination increases the velocity of nerve impulse propagation. In this work, we present a novel in vitro system for coculturing primary dorsal root ganglia neurons along with myelinating cells on a highly restrictive and micropatterned substrate. In this new coculture system, neurons survive for several weeks, extending long axons on defined Matrigel tracks. On these axons, myelinating cells can achieve robust myelination, as demonstrated by the distribution of compact myelin and nodal markers. Under these conditions, neurites and associated myelinating cells are easily accessible for studies on the mechanisms of myelin formation and on the effects of axonal damage on the myelin sheath.
Myelination is a highly regulated developmental process whereby oligodendrocytes in the central nervous system and Schwann cells in the peripheral nervous system ensheathe axons with a multilayered concentric membrane. Axonal myelination increases the velocity of nerve impulse propagation. In this work, we present a novel in vitro system for coculturing primary dorsal root ganglia neurons along with myelinating cells on a highly restrictive and micropatterned substrate. In this new coculture system, neurons survive for several weeks, extending long axons on defined Matrigel tracks. On these axons, myelinating cells can achieve robust myelination, as demonstrated by the distribution of compact myelin and nodal markers. Under these conditions, neurites and associated myelinating cells are easily accessible for studies on the mechanisms of myelin formation and on the effects of axonal damage on the myelin sheath.
Myelin is a specialized membranous
structure generated by two different types of glial cells in the vertebrate
nervous system.[1] Oligodendrocytes in the
central nervous system (CNS) and Schwann cells in the peripheral nervous
system (PNS) produce and extend plasma membrane processes that spirally
enwrap the axon and form myelinated segments (internodes) separated
by intervals known as nodes of Ranvier. Myelin functions as an insulator
that increases the velocity of electrical signals transmitted along
an axon through a process known as saltatory conduction (from Latin:
saltare meaning “to jump”). This occurs because myelinated
internodes allow electrical charges to pass through the axon from
one electrically active area (node of Ranvier) to the next without
dissipating.[2−4] Myelin sheath destruction results in severe motor
and sensory deficits, as seen in patients with de- and dysmyelinating
diseases such as multiple sclerosis, Guillain-Barré syndrome,
and Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease.[5] Although
the myelinating cells of the CNS and PNS have long been identified,
the process by which these cells acquire their extraordinary morphology
and myelinate the axons as well as the mechanisms by which myelin
degenerates in disease states remain elusive.[3] In this regard, establishing reliable in vitro myelination systems
has been crucial for studying the mechanisms underlying myelin formation
and degeneration. Much of what we already know about the characteristics
and potentialities of Schwann cells and oligodendrocytes has come
from cell culture models of differentiation and myelination.[6−8] Although these in vitro systems have revolutionized our understanding
of the molecular and biochemical changes accompanying myelin formation,[9−11] they have been limited by poor experimental control of the microenvironment
and the lack of precise manipulation of single cells. A cell culture
system that facilitates the visualization and manipulation of myelin
in vitro is needed to overcome these limitations.Microfabrication
provides a useful and promising technology for
the design and control at micrometer scale of cellular microenvironments
including substrate topology and biochemical composition, cell types
surrounding the cells of interest, and medium composition.[12,13] Among the numerous available methods to make chemically structured
surfaces, microcontact printing (μCP) is a simple, cost-effective,
and versatile technique that results in micrometer-sized patterns
on surfaces that can be used for cell culture.[14,15] As described in Figure 1, μCP requires
a stamp with a relief of the features to be printed. Such stamps are
cast by polymerizing polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS) on top of microstructured
molds, previously generated by soft-lithography on silicon wafers
coated with a photosensitive matrix (photoresist). Once PDMS polymerizes
as a negative stamp of the pattern, it is peeled from the mold and
inked with the protein of interest. Stamps are then pressed upon coverslips
or plastic Petri dishes, effectively printing the pattern on the surface
(Figure 1). Microcontact printing has been
used to grow different types of neurons including cortical neurons,[16] hippocampal neurons,[12,17] DRG neurons,[18] and motoneurons.[19]
Figure 1
Coverslip micropatterning with Matrigel through microcontact
printing.
Schematic representation of the microcontact printing procedure. Soft
lithography imprinting of a photoresist coated silicon wafer produces
a mold with microsized features. Liquid PDMS is cast to the mold and
allowed to polymerize to form a negative-patterned stamp. After peeling
the silicon stamp from the master, matrigel is applied as ink and
transferred to a substrate by contact printing.
Coverslip micropatterning with Matrigel through microcontact
printing.
Schematic representation of the microcontact printing procedure. Soft
lithography imprinting of a photoresist coated silicon wafer produces
a mold with microsized features. Liquid PDMS is cast to the mold and
allowed to polymerize to form a negative-patterned stamp. After peeling
the silicon stamp from the master, matrigel is applied as ink and
transferred to a substrate by contact printing.In the present work, microcontact printing has
been used to develop
a reliable method for growing long-term myelinating cultures on a
restricted and organized substrate. To do so, we first optimized conditions
that would allow adherence and growth of DRG neurons in the absence
of accompanying myelinating cells. We required a stamping solution
substrate that could promote the growth, survival, and differentiation
of the primary cell cultures and maintain the cultures for the long
periods of time required for in vitro myelination. Polylysines (PDL
or PLL) are positively charged synthetic molecules widely used as
substrates to enhance neuronal adhesion,[20] and have been used in μCP to align neurons in vitro.[21−23] However, we chose to use Matrigel, an extract of basement membrane
proteins and growth factors secreted by Engelbreth-Holm-Swarm (EHS)
mousesarcoma cells, because it is a better substrate for the myelinating
coculture system.[24] Matrigel has been shown
to be highly effective in promoting cell growth and axon extension
of DRG derived neurons while concomitantly supporting Schwann cell
proliferation and differentiation over extended periods of time.[24] In addition, Matrigel has been successfully
used to micropattern substrates for epithelial cells[25] and human embryonic stem cells.[23]To test DRG neuron behavior on the micropatterned surface,
dissociated
DRG cell suspensions were treated with fluorodeoxyuridine (FdU) to
halt the proliferation of dividing cells (i.e., Schwann cells and
fibroblasts) and seeded onto coverslips pretreated with Matrigel in
three different configurations: (A) whole surface uniformly coated
with Matrigel (nonmicropatterned), (B) micropatterned 10 μm
Matrigel lines separated by 110 μm nontreated areas, and (C)
10 μm Matrigel lines with a pitch of 120 μm, where the
nonprinted areas were secondarily modified into surfaces highly restrictive
to cell attachment and growth by poly-l-lysine-grafted poly(Ethylene
Glycol) (PLL-g-PEG) adsorption. PLL-g-PEG is a graft copolymer whose polycationic backbone adsorbs electrostatically
on negatively charged surfaces (such as glass), rendering the treated
surfaces resistant to protein and cell adsorption.[26] Cells were allowed to grow and differentiate over a relatively
short period of time (7 days), after which cultures were fixed and
stained to visualize nuclei with Topro-3 as well as cell bodies and
extending processes with neurofilament immunostaining.DRG neurons
grown on coverslips uniformly coated with Matrigel
extended processes that covered the entire surface with association
and fasciculation of the axons forming bundlelike networks that projected
over relatively long distances (Figure 2A).
As expected, these cells attached haphazardly to the substrate and
did not display any apparent orientation.
Figure 2
7 DIV dorsal root ganglia
neurons and their processes align along
10 μm matrigel lines. DRG neurons pretreated with FdU to eliminate
dividing cells seeded on coverslips. (A) Uniformly coated with Matrigel;
(B) micropatterned 10 μm wide Matrigel lines; (C) micropatterned
10 μm Matrigel lines separated by 110 μm strips of PLL-g-PEG.
Cells were fixed and stained for neurofilament-H (red), an axonal
marker, and nuclei (blue, Topro-3). Scale bar is 50 μm.
7 DIV dorsal root ganglia
neurons and their processes align along
10 μm matrigel lines. DRG neurons pretreated with FdU to eliminate
dividing cells seeded on coverslips. (A) Uniformly coated with Matrigel;
(B) micropatterned 10 μm wide Matrigel lines; (C) micropatterned
10 μm Matrigel lines separated by 110 μm strips of PLL-g-PEG.
Cells were fixed and stained for neurofilament-H (red), an axonal
marker, and nuclei (blue, Topro-3). Scale bar is 50 μm.Dissociated DRG suspensions cultured on 10 μm
wide Matrigel
lines (Figure 2B) had a much different pattern.
While the cell bodies were still homogeneously distributed with no
difference in cell density between the Matrigel lines and the untreated
regions, neurites preferentially associated and extended in parallel
to the Matrigel micropattern lines. We observed that many processes
crossed from one line to the next and continued to extend in the orientation
of their new track (Figure 2B). Note that these
Matrigel lines are considerably narrower and more effective than previously
described μCP laminin tracks which required a width of at least
30 μm to achieve axonal directionality.[27]To determine if narrow lines of Matrigel alone are sufficient
for
neurite extension and if neurites could be restricted to the micropatterned
lines, DRG cells were plated on the highly restrictive micropatterned
substrates (10 μm Matrigel lines separated by 110 μm nonadhesive
PLL-g-PEG strips). An overall decrease in cell number
(Figure 2C) was observed when compared to the
previous track configuration (Figure 2B). The
double nature of this surface patterning confined both cell bodies
and axons to the Matrigel coated lines. Cell attachment outside of
Matrigel lines or connecting from one track to another was rare, reflecting
a lack of cell adhesion in the PLL-g-PEG covered
areas.Considering this promising data, we then investigated
if DRG-derived
neurites growing on highly restrictive substrates could reproduce
the two myelination paradigms that comprise myelin research: CNS myelination
by oligodendrocytes and PNS myelination by Schwann cells.To
model CNS myelination in vitro, we added exogenous rat oligodendrocytes
precursor cells (OPCs) to DRG neurons that had grown for 7 days on
highly restrictive micropatterned substrates. Cocultures were fixed
and stained after a further 7 days. Under these conditions, OPCs lose
their bipolar morphology, acquire the characteristic multiple-process
geometry of mature oligodendrocytes, and express late differentiation
markers: RIP and MBP (ref (28); Figure 3). We observed that these
cells were capable of engaging and enwrapping (Figure 3) multiple axons from two or more different Matrigel lines,
in spite of the nonpermissive PLL-g-PEG areas (Figure 3, arrows). This distribution is highly reminiscent
of the in vivo organization of white matter tracks, where each oligodendrocyte
myelinates multiple axons and gives rise to many internodes. While
it was not possible to confirm the presence of axon-surrounding structures
that represent mature compact myelin by immunoflorescence microscopy,
we did observed by scanning electron microscopy a substantial amount
of plasma membrane that appeared to wrap around the neurites (Figure 3E and F).
Figure 3
Oligodendrocytes associate with multiple axons
from different permissive
Matrigel lines and engage and extend membranes on DRG neuron processes.
DRG-neurons were seeded on the highly restrictive micropatterned coverslips
in the presence of FdU to eliminate dividing cells. After 7 DIV, cortically
derived OPCs were added to the cell culture. Seven days after coculture,
cells were fixed. In panels (A–D), cells were stained to reveal
oligodendrocytes with an oligodendroglial specific marker (RIP in
green, MBP in blue) and DRG neurons with neurofilament (red). Scale
bar is 100 μm. In panels (E) and (F), cells were observed via
a JSM-6460LV scanning electron microscope. Scale bars are 100 μm
(E) and 10 μm (F).
Oligodendrocytes associate with multiple axons
from different permissive
Matrigel lines and engage and extend membranes on DRG neuron processes.
DRG-neurons were seeded on the highly restrictive micropatterned coverslips
in the presence of FdU to eliminate dividing cells. After 7 DIV, cortically
derived OPCs were added to the cell culture. Seven days after coculture,
cells were fixed. In panels (A–D), cells were stained to reveal
oligodendrocytes with an oligodendroglial specific marker (RIP in
green, MBP in blue) and DRG neurons with neurofilament (red). Scale
bar is 100 μm. In panels (E) and (F), cells were observed via
a JSM-6460LV scanning electron microscope. Scale bars are 100 μm
(E) and 10 μm (F).To investigate PNS myelination on our patterned
substrates, we
withheld the FdU treatment from dissociated DRG cell cultures, thus
keeping the endogenous Schwann cells alive and dividing.[24] After 7 days in vitro, PNS cocultures were fixed
and stained with an antibody recognizing α-tubulin which is
present in DRG neurons and Schwann cells, an antibody recognizing
neurofilament, a specific marker for DRG processes, and Topro-3, a
marker that stains the nuclei of both DRG neurons and Schwann cells.
When plated on the highly restrictive μCP surface, both the
neuronal cells and the accompanying non-neuronal cells were restricted
to the Matrigel lines (Figure 4) with all cell
nuclei showing a flattened morphology (Figure 4C) likely due to limited surface being available for the attachment
on the thin Matrigel lines. Tubulin staining of the cells shows two
distinct patterns: fine continuous filament staining along axons and
diffuse staining in nuclei-associated areas, similar to the noncompacted
cytoplasmic Schwann cell soma areas that line PNS myelin (Figure 4A). Therefore, axon juxtaposed cells in Matrigel
confined lines presented multiple characteristics reminiscent of myelinating
Schwann cells.
Figure 4
Dorsal root ganglia neurons and Schwann cells are restricted
to
Matrigel micropatterns after 7 days of in vitro culture. DRG-derived
cells (neurons and Schwann cells) seeded on the highly restrictive
micropatterned coverslips and maintained for 7 days. Cultures were
fixed and stained to reveal (A) α-tubulin subunit present in
both cultured cells types Schwann cells and DRG neurons (green), (B)
axonal neurofilament-H (red), and (C) nuclei (Topro-3; blue). Scale
bar is 50 μm.
Dorsal root ganglia neurons and Schwann cells are restricted
to
Matrigel micropatterns after 7 days of in vitro culture. DRG-derived
cells (neurons and Schwann cells) seeded on the highly restrictive
micropatterned coverslips and maintained for 7 days. Cultures were
fixed and stained to reveal (A) α-tubulin subunit present in
both cultured cells types Schwann cells and DRG neurons (green), (B)
axonal neurofilament-H (red), and (C) nuclei (Topro-3; blue). Scale
bar is 50 μm.Having demonstrated that neurons and Schwann cells
can be cocultured
on micropatterned Matrigel lines, we now stimulated the myelination
program by supplementing the culture media with 20 μM ascorbic
acid for 6 weeks, the standard protocol for in vitro studies of myelin
deposition.[6] Under these conditions, Schwann
cells engaged and wrapped axons with each Schwann cell enwrapping
a single axon. Axons showed intermittent ensheathment by smooth tubular
structures, consistent with fully myelinated internodes. These periodic
structures were highly enriched in MBP (Figure 5A and B), which in the PNS is only present in terminally differentiated
Schwann cells.[29] Axonal organization was
consistent with establishment of fully myelinated segments, as was
shown by the distribution of CASPR (Figure 5C), an axonal protein that strictly localizes to the paranodal regions
that flank the nodes of Ranvier.[29]
Figure 5
Dorsal root
ganglia axons confined to micropatterns become fully
myelinated, forming nodes of Ranvier. Long-term behavior of typical
myelinating DRG neurons and Schwann cells growing on the highly restrictive
micropatterned coverslips. Myelination by the Schwann cells was stimulated
by ascorbic acid. After 6 weeks in vitro, cells were fixed and stained
to reveal markers for compact myelin (MBP, green; A and B), nodes
of Ranvier (CASPR, an axonal marker of paranodal areas, green, (C)
and axons of DRG neurons (neurofilament-H in red, A, B, C). Scale
bar is 50 μm.
Dorsal root
ganglia axons confined to micropatterns become fully
myelinated, forming nodes of Ranvier. Long-term behavior of typical
myelinating DRG neurons and Schwann cells growing on the highly restrictive
micropatterned coverslips. Myelination by the Schwann cells was stimulated
by ascorbic acid. After 6 weeks in vitro, cells were fixed and stained
to reveal markers for compact myelin (MBP, green; A and B), nodes
of Ranvier (CASPR, an axonal marker of paranodal areas, green, (C)
and axons of DRG neurons (neurofilament-H in red, A, B, C). Scale
bar is 50 μm.In conclusion, we report a new model system for
studying CNS and
PNS myelination in vitro in a highly structured manner. The method
describes how to make thin (10 μm) substrate lines with a pitch
of 120 μm, where the nonprinted areas are backfilled with PLL-g-PEG. Onto these surfaces we plated rat dorsal root ganglia
derived sensory neuron in the presence or absence of myelinating cells:
OPCs as a CNS culture system or Schwann cells as a PNS culture system.
Our data shows that, at 7 days after plating, neurons have extended
long neurites along the micropatterned tracks and this can be maintained
several weeks in culture. Meanwhile, myelinating cells in these cultures
were healthy and associated with axons. Both the CNS and PNS culture
systems showed evidence of myelination, although this was more complete
in the PNS system as shown by the presence of compact myelin and formation
of internodes. Indeed, after several weeks in vitro, Schwann cells
organized into classical internodes inducing the formation of functional
subdomains along axons. To our knowledge, this is the first report
of coculture between myelinating cells and axons in a structured surface
platform that has achieved myelination. It is important to stress
that the coculture system requires a long time in culture to achieve
full myelination; therefore, it is notable that the micropatterned
substrates resisted 6 weeks of culture while allowing neuron and Schwann
cell maintenance, axon directionality, and in vitro myelination. Such
long-term cell culture conditions have not been previously described
for μCP.A major advantage of our system is that the μCP
is done on
top of glass coverslips; therefore, it can readily be adapted to glass-bottom
cell-culture dishes, which, in conjunction with inverted microscopy,
permit live-cell imaging. In this context, the limited number of axons
and myelinating cells in each Matrigel line would facilitate the characterization
of morphological and biomechanical events that occur both during axonal
ensheathment and myelin compaction. Such a live-cell setup will permit
the study of axon–myelin interactions and responses to localized
damage by laser light ablation or to the addition of immune cells,
therefore modeling the events surrounding nerve damage and autoimmune
diseases. Likewise, these conditions are likely to prove ideal for
research on isolated neurons with oriented axons, a necessary model
in the study of the cellular and molecular pathways that underlie
the peripheral neuropathies caused by multiples stressors (diabetes,
human immunodeficiency virus, or toxicity from chemotherapy treatment).[30] Finally, the coupling of this platform to localized
delivery by microfluidic probes[31,32] will permit a live-cell
based assay for the evaluation of axon and/or myelin protecting or
myelination enhancing drugs.
Materials and Methods
Silicon Wafer Fabrication
Polished 4 in. silicon wafers
were spin-coated with SU-8 2015 resist (Microchem Corp., Newton, MA)
to a nominal thickness of 15 μm and soft-baked on a hot plate
at 95 °C for 3 min to drive out the solvent. The coated wafers
were exposed to ∼130 mJ/cm2 white light (long-pass
filtered with a cutoff at 350 nm) in a contact aligner (EVG 620) and
postbaked on a hot plate at 95 °C for 4 min. The exposed wafer
was developed by immersion in SU-8 developer (Microchem Corp.) for
3 min and finally rinsed with isopropyl alcohol and air-dried. A hard
bake step at 150 °C for 1 min removed surface cracks.
PDMS Production and Matrigel Printing
Polydimethylsiloxane
(PDMS, Sylgard 184, Dow Corning, Midland, MI) and the curing agent
were combined at a ratio of 10:1, mixed thoroughly and degassed under
vacuum. The PDMS mixture was poured over the relief master wafer.
The PDMS was then allowed to polymerize in the oven for 24 h at 60
°C. The cured PDMS layer was then gently peeled off. The stamps
were cleaned in ethanol 70% then cut in 1 cm2 squares and
incubated with Matrigel (BD Biosciences, Mississauga, ON) diluted
1:10 in L15 medium (Invitrogen, Burlington, ON) at 4 °C overnight.
The next day, the stamps were washed twice with L-15, nitrogen dried,
and used to microcontact print Petri dishes and/or plasma treated
coverslips. Oxygen plasma treatment was done to enhance the hydrophilicity
of glass, which increases the adherence of Matrigel.
Passivation with Poly-l-lysine-Grafted Poly(ethylene
glycol) (PLL-g-PEG) Backfilling
PLL (20
kDa)-g-(3.5)-PEG (2 kDa) (Susos AG, Switzerland)
is a graft polymer with a 20 kDa PLL backbone with 2 kDa PEG side
chains and a grafting ratio of 3.5 (mean PLL monomer units per PEG
side chain). PLL-g-PEG was used to backfill the nonprinted regions.
This reagent has been previously shown to be highly resistant to the
attachment of single proteins, serum, and plasma components.[26,33]
Animals
Sprague–Dawley rats were obtained from
Charles River Canada (Saint-Constant, QC). All procedures were performed
in accordance with the Canadian Council on Animal Care guidelines
for the use of animals in research.
Cell Culture
Rat Dorsal Root Ganglia Cells
The procedure used for
dissection and cell culture has been described previously.[24] In brief, DRGs were dissected from rat E15–16
embryos and, after digestion with 0.25% trypsin, mechanically dissociated
with a plastic Pasteur pipet. The resulting cells were plated on the
previously described substrates at approximately 0.5 × 105 cells/mL in Neurobasal media containing 2% B27, 0.3% l-glutamine (Invitrogen), and 75 ng/mL nerve growth factor (NGF;
Roche, Laval, QC). At 2–3 days after plating, 50 μg/mL
ascorbic acid (Sigma-Aldrich Canada, Oakville, ON) was added to the
PNS cell culture media.
Rat Oligodendrocyte Culture
OPCs were obtained from
mixed glial cultures derived from newborn rat cerebral cortices, as
described previously.[34] Briefly, after
plating cerebral cortex cultures in Dulbecco’s modified Eagle’s
medium (DMEM; Invitrogen) with 10% fetal bovine serum and 1% penicillin–streptomycin
(Invitrogen) on poly-d-lysine-coated flasks for 7–10
days, OPCs were separated by agitation at 220 rpm for 1 h to remove
microglial cells and overnight to lift off OPCs. The OPCs were further
purified by differential adhesion to uncoated Petri dishes, resuspended
in Sato medium (DMEM, 5 μg/mL human transferrin, 10 μg/mL
insulin, 100 μM putrescine, 200 nM progesterone, 500 pM tri-iodo-thyronine,
220 nM selenium, 520 nM l-thyroxine, and 1% penicillin/streptomycin)
and plated on the neuronal cultures and cultured in 1:1 Neurobasal-Sato
media.
Immunofluorescence
Cells were fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde
in PBS and permeabilized with 0.2% Triton X-100 in PBS. Primary antibodies
were used to detect α-tubulin (DSHB; 1:100), neurofilament-H
(Aves Laboratories; 1:1000), myelin basic protein (1:1000), and CASPR
(NeuroMab; Davis, CA; 1:75). The following secondary antibodies (Jackson
ImmunoResearch; Mississauga, ON) were used: fluorescein-conjugated
donkey anti-mouse (1:1000), fluorescein-conjugated donkey anti-rabbit
(1:1000), and rhodamine-conjugated goat anti-chicken (1:500). The
Topro-3 marker (Invitrogen; 1:1000) was used to stain nuclei. All
incubations were in 5% bovine serum albumin in PBS overnight at 4
°C with PBS washes between steps. Coverslips were mounted in
Aqua-Poly/Mount (Polysciences Inc., Warrington, PA) and visualized
with a Fluoview (FV1000) Olympus confocal microscope.
Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM)
Cells cultured on
coverslips were fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde, washed twice with PBS,
post fixed with OsO4, and washed twice in PBS followed
by water. They were then gently removed from their wells, mounted
on a stub with carbon tape, and examined wet using a JEOL variable
pressure scanning electron microscope JSM-6460LV at around 50 Pa and
a voltage of 10 kV.
Authors: Poornapriya Ramamurthy; Joshua B White; Joong Yull Park; Richard I Hume; Fumi Ebisu; Flor Mendez; Shuichi Takayama; Kate F Barald Journal: Dev Dyn Date: 2016-11-17 Impact factor: 3.780
Authors: Jonathan W Cheng; Christopher G Sip; Philip R Lindstedt; Ross Boitano; Blake M Bluestein; Lara J Gamble; Albert Folch Journal: ACS Appl Bio Mater Date: 2019-10-21
Authors: John W Rumsey; Christopher McAleer; Mainak Das; Abhijeet Bhalkikar; Kerry Wilson; Maria Stancescu; Stephen Lambert; James J Hickman Journal: In Vitro Cell Dev Biol Anim Date: 2013-08-16 Impact factor: 2.416
Authors: Fábio F F Garrudo; Paiyz E Mikael; Ke Xia; João C Silva; Yilan Ouyang; Caitlyn A Chapman; Pauline R Hoffman; Yanlei Yu; Xiaurui Han; Carlos A V Rodrigues; Joaquim M S Cabral; Jorge Morgado; Frederico C Ferreira; Robert J Linhardt Journal: Biochimie Date: 2021-01-07 Impact factor: 4.079
Authors: Wiam Belkaid; Peter Thostrup; Patricia T Yam; Camille A Juzwik; Edward S Ruthazer; Ajit S Dhaunchak; David R Colman Journal: BMC Biotechnol Date: 2013-10-11 Impact factor: 2.563
Authors: Ajay V Singh; Michael Raymond; Fabiano Pace; Anthony Certo; Jonathan M Zuidema; Christopher A McKay; Ryan J Gilbert; X Lucas Lu; Leo Q Wan Journal: Sci Rep Date: 2015-01-19 Impact factor: 4.379