| Literature DB >> 22347575 |
K Karthikeyan1, K Nanthakumar, K Shanthi, P Lakshmanaperumalsamy.
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Discharge of wastewater from textile dyeing industries has been a problem in terms of pollution and treatment of these waters is a great task. Keeping this in mind, the aim of our current research is to study the effect of various bioprocess variables on decolorization of an azo dye, Congo red, by a fungal isolate, Aspergillus niger HM11.Entities:
Keywords: Aspergillus niger HM11; CCD; Congo red; Decolorization; RSM
Year: 2010 PMID: 22347575 PMCID: PMC3279788
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Iran J Microbiol ISSN: 2008-3289
Plackett – Burman design for screening bioprocess variables affecting decolorization of Congo red.
| Run | pH | Temp(°C) | Agitation (rpm) | Incubation time (hrs) | Dye concentration (mg/L) | Glucose (%) | Peptone (%) | Magnesium sulphate (%) | Chromium (mM) | Phenols (mM) | Sodium(%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 3 | 20 | 0 | 0 | 10 | 0.1 | 0.1 | 0.05 | 0.05 | 0.05 | 0.05 |
| 2 | 11 | 20 | 300 | 72 | 1000 | 0.1 | 0.1 | 0.05 | 0.5 | 0.05 | 0.5 |
| 3 | 11 | 60 | 0 | 0 | 10 | 1.0 | 0.1 | 0.5 | 0.5 | 0.05 | 0.5 |
| 4 | 11 | 20 | 300 | 72 | 10 | 1.0 | 0.5 | 0.5 | 0.05 | 0.05 | 0.05 |
| 5 | 3 | 20 | 0 | 72 | 10 | 1.0 | 0.5 | 0.05 | 0.5 | 0.5 | 0.5 |
| 6 | 11 | 20 | 0 | 0 | 1000 | 0.1 | 0.5 | 0.5 | 0.05 | 0.5 | 0.5 |
| 7 | 3 | 60 | 300 | 0 | 1000 | 1.0 | 0.5 | 0.05 | 0.05 | 0.05 | 0.5 |
| 8 | 11 | 60 | 0 | 72 | 1000 | 1.0 | 0.1 | 0.05 | 0.05 | 0.5 | 0.05 |
| 9 | 3 | 20 | 300 | 0 | 1000 | 1.0 | 0.1 | 0.5 | 0.5 | 0.5 | 0.05 |
| 10 | 11 | 60 | 300 | 0 | 10 | 0.1 | 0.5 | 0.05 | 0.5 | 0.5 | 0.05 |
| 11 | 3 | 60 | 0 | 72 | 1000 | 0.1 | 0.5 | 0.5 | 0.5 | 0.05 | 0.05 |
| 12 | 3 | 60 | 300 | 72 | 10 | 0.1 | 0.1 | 0.5 | 0.05 | 0.5 | 0.5 |
Plackett - Burman design for evaluating factors influencing Congo red degradation by A. niger HM11
| Run | A | B | C | D | E | F | G | H | J | K | L | % decolorization |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 3 | 20 | 0 | 0 | 10 | 0.1 | 0.1 | 0.05 | 0.05 | 0.05 | 0.05 | 2.98 |
| 2 | 11 | 20 | 300 | 72 | 1000 | 0.1 | 0.1 | 0.05 | 0.5 | 0.05 | 0.5 | 71.21 |
| 3 | 11 | 60 | 0 | 0 | 10 | 1.0 | 0.1 | 0.5 | 0.5 | 0.05 | 0.5 | 7.75 |
| 4 | 11 | 20 | 300 | 72 | 10 | 1.0 | 0.5 | 0.5 | 0.05 | 0.05 | 0.05 | 74.95 |
| 5 | 3 | 20 | 0 | 72 | 10 | 1.0 | 0.5 | 0.05 | 0.5 | 0.5 | 0.5 | 6.04 |
| 6 | 11 | 20 | 0 | 0 | 1000 | 0.1 | 0.5 | 0.5 | 0.05 | 0.5 | 0.5 | 8.47 |
| 7 | 3 | 60 | 300 | 0 | 1000 | 1.0 | 0.5 | 0.05 | 0.05 | 0.05 | 0.5 | 65.42 |
| 8 | 11 | 60 | 0 | 72 | 1000 | 1.0 | 0.1 | 0.05 | 0.05 | 0.5 | 0.05 | 46.97 |
| 9 | 3 | 20 | 300 | 0 | 1000 | 1.0 | 0.1 | 0.5 | 0.5 | 0.5 | 0.05 | 30.66 |
| 10 | 11 | 60 | 300 | 0 | 10 | 0.1 | 0.5 | 0.05 | 0.5 | 0.5 | 0.05 | 54.45 |
| 11 | 3 | 60 | 0 | 72 | 1000 | 0.1 | 0.5 | 0.5 | 0.5 | 0.05 | 0.05 | 29.54 |
| 12 | 3 | 60 | 300 | 72 | 10 | 0.1 | 0.1 | 0.5 | 0.05 | 0.5 | 0.5 | 69.98 |
A: Ph
B: Temperature (oC)
C: Agitation (rpm)
D: Incubation time (hrs)
E: Dye CONCENTRATION (mg/L)
F: Glucose (%)
G: Peptone (%)
H: Magnesium sulphate (%)
J: Chromium (mM)
K: Phenol (mM)
L: Sodium salts (%)
Fig. 1Pareto chart for Plackett Burman design for 11 factors on Congo red decolorization by Aspergillus niger HM11.
Analysis of variance for Congo red decolorization.
| Source | Sum of square | Degree of freedom | Mean square | F–Value | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Model | 8571.060 | 7 | 1224.440 | 0.758 | 0.003 | Significant |
| A-pH | 291.856 | 1 | 291.856 | 6.855 | 0.059 | |
| C-Agitation | 5848.550 | 1 | 5848.550 | 137.365 | 0.000 | |
| D-Incubation time | 1385.890 | 1 | 1385.890 | 32.550 | 0.005 | |
| F-Glucose | 7.239 | 1 | 7.239 | 0.170 | 0.701 | |
| Residual | 170.307 | 4 | 42.577 | |||
| Cor Total | 8741.360 | 11 |
Experimental plan for optimization of Congo red decolorization using central composite design (CCD).
| Decolorization (%) | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Run | pH | Agitation (rpm) | Incubation time (hrs) | Glucose (%) | Experimental | Predicted |
| 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 82.60 | 95.62 |
| 2 | −1 | −1 | −1 | −1 | 45.80 | 51.09 |
| 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | −2 | 90.90 | 84.31 |
| 4 | −1 | 1 | 1 | −1 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 97.60 | 95.62 |
| 6 | −1 | 1 | −1 | −1 | 20.80 | 32.72 |
| 7 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 38.90 | 29.18 |
| 8 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 98.90 | 95.62 |
| 9 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 97.60 | 86.16 |
| 10 | 1 | −1 | 1 | −1 | 32.50 | 46.69 |
| 11 | 0 | 0 | −2 | 0 | 97.60 | 95.62 |
| 12 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 97.20 | 95.62 |
| 13 | −1 | 1 | −1 | 1 | 23.80 | 31.56 |
| 14 | −2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| 15 | −1 | −1 | 1 | −1 | 11.20 | 21.78 |
| 16 | −1 | −1 | 1 | 1 | 13.50 | 19.38 |
| 17 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 12.60 | 19.26 |
| 18 | 1 | 1 | −1 | −1 | 55.80 | 51.88 |
| 19 | 1 | 1 | 1 | −1 | 55.80 | 39.87 |
| 20 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| 21 | −1 | −1 | −1 | 1 | 12.80 | 12.43 |
| 22 | 1 | −1 | −1 | −1 | 32.50 | 37.25 |
| 23 | −1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 15.80 | 27.05 |
| 24 | 1 | −1 | 1 | 1 | 15.80 | 6.58 |
| 25 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 96.40 | 85.04 |
| 26 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 97.60 | 61.09 |
| 27 | 0 | −2 | 0 | 0 | 95.10 | 86.88 |
| 28 | 1 | −1 | −1 | 1 | 12.90 | 22.89 |
| 29 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 12.90 | 95.62 |
| 30 | 1 | 1 | −1 | 1 | 2.60 | 11.02 |
ANOVA for the experimental results of the central composite design (quadratic model)
| Source | Sum of square | Degree of freedom | Mean square | F–Value | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Model | 32221.200 | 14 | 2301.511 | 2.728 | 0.032 | Significant |
| A-pH | 105.002 | 1 | 105.002 | 0.124 | 0.729 | |
| B-Agitation | 469.935 | 1 | 469.935 | 0.557 | 0.467 | |
| C-Incubation time | 340.507 | 1 | 340.507 | 0.404 | 0.535 | |
| D-Glucose | 556.807 | 1 | 556.807 | 0.660 | 0.429 | |
| AB | 169.000 | 1 | 169.000 | 0.200 | 0.661 | |
| AC | 76.563 | 1 | 76.563 | 0.091 | 0.767 | |
| AD | 660.490 | 1 | 660.490 | 0.783 | 0.390 | |
| BC | 2.103 | 1 | 2.103 | 0.002 | 0.961 | |
| BD | 56.250 | 1 | 56.250 | 0.067 | 0.800 | |
| CD | 264.063 | 1 | 264.063 | 0.313 | 0.584 | |
| A2 | 26611.000 | 1 | 26611.000 | 31.538 | < 0.0001 | |
| B2 | 5685.940 | 1 | 5685.943 | 6.739 | 0.020 | |
| C2 | 1248.940 | 1 | 1248.943 | 1.480 | 0.243 | |
| D2 | 1641.230 | 1 | 1641.234 | 1.945 | 0.183 | |
| Residual | 12656.800 | 15 | 843.788 | – | – | |
| Lack of Fit | 12448.700 | 10 | 1244.874 | 29.912 | 0.001 | Significant |
| Pure Error | 208.088 | 5 | 41.618 | – | – | |
| Cor Total | 44878.000 | 29 | – | – | – |
CV-6.03; R2-0.7180
Fig. 2Three dimensional response surface plot for the effect of (A) pH, agitation; (B) pH, incubation time; (C) pH, glucose; (D) agitation, incubation time; (E) agitation, glucose; (F) incubation time, glucose on decolorization of Congo red by Aspergillus niger HM11
Fig. 3Perturbation graph showing the optimum values of the tested variables.