Literature DB >> 22347536

Literature review of the energy sources for performing laparoscopic colorectal surgery.

Tsukasa Hotta1, Katsunari Takifuji, Shozo Yokoyama, Kenji Matsuda, Takashi Higashiguchi, Toshiji Tominaga, Yoshimasa Oku, Takashi Watanabe, Toru Nasu, Tadamichi Hashimoto, Koichi Tamura, Junji Ieda, Naoyuki Yamamoto, Hiromitsu Iwamoto, Hiroki Yamaue.   

Abstract

Laparoscopic surgery for colorectal disease has become widespread as a minimally invasive treatment. This is important because the increasing availability of new devices allows us to perform procedures with a reduced length of surgery and decreased blood loss. We herein report the results of a literature review of energy sources for laparoscopic colorectal surgery, focused especially on 6 studies comparing ultrasonic coagulating shears (UCS) and other instruments. We also describe our laparoscopic dissection techniques using UCS for colorectal cancer. The short-term outcomes of surgeries using UCS and Ligasure for laparoscopic colorectal surgery were superior to conventional electrosurgery. Some authors have reported that the length of surgery or blood loss when Ligasure was used for laparoscopic colorectal surgery is less than when UCS was used. On the other hand, a recent study demonstrated that there were no significant differences between the short-term outcomes of UCS and Ligasure for laparoscopic colorectal surgery. It is therefore suggested that the choice of technique used should be made according to the surgeon's preference. We also describe our laparoscopic dissection techniques using UCS (Harmonic ACE) for colorectal cancer with regard to the retroperitoneum dissection, dissection technique, dissection technique around the feeding artery, and various other dissection techniques. We therefore review the outcomes of using various energy sources for laparoscopic colorectal surgery and describe our laparoscopic dissection techniques with UCS (Harmonic ACE) for colorectal cancer.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Colon and rectum; Dissection technique; Harmonic Scalpel; Laparoscopic surgery; Ligasure; Ultrasonic coagulating shears

Year:  2012        PMID: 22347536      PMCID: PMC3277876          DOI: 10.4240/wjgs.v4.i1.1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  World J Gastrointest Surg


  14 in total

1.  Ultrasonic versus standard electric dissection in laparoscopic colorectal surgery: a prospective randomized clinical trial.

Authors:  Mario Morino; Roberto Rimonda; Marco Ettore Allaix; Giuseppe Giraudo; Corrado Garrone
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 12.969

2.  The harmonic scalpel technique without supplementary ligation in total thyroidectomy with central neck dissection: a prospective randomized study.

Authors:  Yoon Woo Koh; Jae Hong Park; Seung Won Lee; Eun Chang Choi
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 12.969

3.  Laparoscopic surgery versus open surgery for colon cancer: short-term outcomes of a randomised trial.

Authors:  Ruben Veldkamp; Esther Kuhry; Wim C J Hop; J Jeekel; G Kazemier; H Jaap Bonjer; Eva Haglind; Lars Påhlman; Miguel A Cuesta; Simon Msika; Mario Morino; Antonio M Lacy
Journal:  Lancet Oncol       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 41.316

4.  Energy sources for laparoscopic colectomy: a prospective randomized comparison of conventional electrosurgery, bipolar computer-controlled electrosurgery and ultrasonic dissection. Operative outcome and costs analysis.

Authors:  Eduardo Ma Targarona; Carmen Balague; Juan Marin; Rene Berindoague Neto; Carmen Martinez; Jordi Garriga; Manuel Trias
Journal:  Surg Innov       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 2.058

5.  Short-term endpoints of conventional versus laparoscopic-assisted surgery in patients with colorectal cancer (MRC CLASICC trial): multicentre, randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Pierre J Guillou; Philip Quirke; Helen Thorpe; Joanne Walker; David G Jayne; Adrian M H Smith; Richard M Heath; Julia M Brown
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2005 May 14-20       Impact factor: 79.321

6.  Comparative study of electrothermal bipolar vessel sealer and ultrasonic coagulating shears in laparoscopic colectomy.

Authors:  M Takada; T Ichihara; Y Kuroda
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2004-12-02       Impact factor: 4.584

7.  Electrothermal bipolar vessel sealing device vs. ultrasonic coagulating shears in laparoscopic colectomies: a comparative study.

Authors:  Roberto Campagnacci; Angelo de Sanctis; Maddalena Baldarelli; Massimiliano Rimini; Giovanni Lezoche; Mario Guerrieri
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2007-02-08       Impact factor: 4.584

8.  A comparison of laparoscopically assisted and open colectomy for colon cancer.

Authors:  Heidi Nelson; Daniel J Sargent; H Sam Wieand; James Fleshman; Mehran Anvari; Steven J Stryker; Robert W Beart; Michael Hellinger; Richard Flanagan; Walter Peters; David Ota
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2004-05-13       Impact factor: 91.245

9.  Electrothermal bipolar vessel sealing system vs. harmonic scalpel in colorectal laparoscopic surgery: a prospective, randomized study.

Authors:  Roberto Rimonda; Alberto Arezzo; Corrado Garrone; Marco Ettore Allaix; Giuseppe Giraudo; Mario Morino
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 4.585

10.  Laparoscopic lymph node dissection using ultrasonically activated shears: comparison with electrosurgery.

Authors:  Z Holub; A Jabor; L Kliment; J Lukac; J Voracek
Journal:  J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 1.878

View more
  5 in total

1.  Robotically-enhanced surgical anatomy enables surgeons to perform distal gastrectomy for gastric cancer using electric cautery devices alone.

Authors:  Hirokazu Noshiro; Osamu Ikeda; Masako Urata
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2013-11-08       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  LigaSure small jaws versus cold knife dissection in superficial parotidectomy.

Authors:  Christoffer Holst Hahn; Christian Hjort Sørensen
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2012-10-02       Impact factor: 2.503

3.  Robotic spleen-preserving total gastrectomy shows better short-term advantages: a comparative study with laparoscopic surgery.

Authors:  Zu-Kai Wang; Jian-Xian Lin; Fu-Hai Wang; Jian-Wei Xie; Jia-Bin Wang; Jun Lu; Qi-Yue Chen; Long-Long Cao; Mi Lin; Ru-Hong Tu; Ze-Ning Huang; Ju-Li Lin; Hua-Long Zheng; Ping Li; Chao-Hui Zheng; Chang-Ming Huang
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2022-06-13       Impact factor: 4.584

4.  Major vessel sealing in laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancer: a single-center experience with 759 patients.

Authors:  Michele Grieco; Daniela Apa; Domenico Spoletini; Emanuela Grattarola; Massimo Carlini
Journal:  World J Surg Oncol       Date:  2018-06-01       Impact factor: 2.754

5.  Use of energy device in general surgical operations: impact on peri-operative outcomes.

Authors:  Olalekan Olasehinde; Afolabi Owojuyigbe; Adekunle Adeyemo; Arinzechukwu Mosanya; Olurotimi Aaron; Funmilola Wuraola; Temitope Owoniya; Temilola Owojuyigbe; Olusegun Alatise; Adewale Adisa
Journal:  BMC Surg       Date:  2022-03-09       Impact factor: 2.102

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.