Literature DB >> 22347295

Molecular Identification and Differentiation of Fasciola Isolates Using PCR- RFLP Method Based on Internal Transcribed Spacer (ITS1, 5.8S rDNA, ITS2).

M Mahami-Oskouei1, A Dalimi, M Forouzandeh-Moghadam, Mb Rokni.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: In this study, we used both ITS1 and ITS2 for molecular identification of Fasciola species.
METHODS: The region between 18S and 28S of ribosomal DNA was used in PCR-RFLP method for molecular identification of Fasciola species. Ninety trematodes of Fasciola were collected during abattoir inspection from livers of naturally infected sheep and cattle from Khorasan, East Azerbaijan, and Fars provinces in Iran. After DNA extraction, PCR was performed to amplify region ITS1, 5.8S rDNA, ITS2. To select a suitable restriction enzyme, we sequenced and analyzed the PCR products of F. hepatica and F. gigantica samples from sheep and cattle. Tsp509I fast digest restriction enzyme was selected for RFLP method that caused the separation specifically of Fasciola species.
RESULTS: The fragment approximately 1000bp in all of the Fasciola samples was amplified and then digested with the Tsp509I restriction endonuclease. Seventy F. hepatica and 20 F. gigantica were identified of total 90 Fasciola isolates.
CONCLUSION: The new PCR-RFLP assay using Tsp509I restriction enzyme provides a simple, practical, fast, low cost, and reliable method for identification and differentiation of Fasciola isolates.

Entities:  

Keywords:  5.8S rDNA; Fasciola gigantica; Fasciola hepatica; ITS1; ITS2; Iran; PCR-RFLP

Year:  2011        PMID: 22347295      PMCID: PMC3279892     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Iran J Parasitol        ISSN: 1735-7020            Impact factor:   1.012


Introduction

Fascioliasis, caused by Fasciola spp., is one of the most common parasitic diseases between humans and animals that in terms of health problems and great economic losses in various regions of the world, is of great grandness (1, 2). The role of Fasciola spp. in weight loss and therefore decrease the production of meat and other livestock as well as reduce fertility has been appraised already (3). Fasciola infection to cattle in some parts of Iran is very serious (4). In two last decades, some studies concerning of prevalence of animal fasciolosis have been carried out in different parts of Iran (5–7). About 2.4-17 million cases of human fascioliasis are estimated in the world and 180 million exposed at risk of fascioliasis that demonstrates the importance of the disease (3). Two great epidemics of human fascioliasis with about 10,000 people infected in each case occurred in the north of Iran (4, 8, 9). As regards the health and economic importance of fascioliasis in Iran, various studies especially in order to identify and genotyping of Fasciola seems necessary. Morphological characteristics of adult worms and eggs are affected under the different factors such as host type, age of parasite, fixation of the samples and severity of infection (1). Due to the many variations in morphological characteristics, overlapping distribution, abnormal diploidy, triploidy and mixploidy, hybridization between various genotypes and likely intermediate forms, it is usually difficult to accurate differentiation between Fasciola species (10, 11). Also in human infections, clinical, parasitological, and serological findings do not distinguish these species (12). Therefore, it seems that the use of the accurate and reliable method for identification and differentiation of Fasciola species is necessary. For this purpose, PCR-RFLP has been used in some studies (13–17) based on 28s rRNA, 18s rRNA, ITS1 or ITS2. In this study, region between 18S and 28S (ITS1, 5.8s, ITS2) of ribosomal DNA was used by PCR-RFLP method. Since, ITS1 and ITS2 sequence was suitable genetic markers for genotyping, interaspecific variations, and phylogenetic studies of parasites (14, 18); we used both ITS1 and ITS2 for molecular identification of Fasciola species.

Materials and Methods

Parasite

Ninety trematodes of Fasciola were collected during abattoir inspection from livers of naturally infected sheep and cattle from Khorasan, East Azerbaijan, and Fars provinces in Iran (Table 1). All samples were washed in physiological saline, identified to the species level based on morphometric criteria according to standard taxonomic keys (19, 20) and subsequently fixed in 80% ethanol and stored at −80°C until further use.
Table 1

Number of Fasciola isolates and their geographical origin

LocationHostSpeciesNumber of isolates
KhorasanSheepF. hepatica10
KhorasanSheepF. gigantica5
KhorasanCattleF. hepatica15
FarsSheepF. hepatica15
FarsCattleF. gigantica15
East AzerbaijanSheepF. hepatica15
East AzerbaijanCattleF. hepatica15
Number of Fasciola isolates and their geographical origin

DNA extraction

Bioneer AccuPrep® kit was used for genomic DNA extraction of Fasciola Parasites. After removing the samples from −80°C and squashing, DNA extraction was performed according to manufacturer instruction. To achieve the desired results, we used at least 4 h incubation time for Fasciola samples in 60°C with lysis buffer and 40 µl of Proteinase K as a modified DNA extraction method.

PCR

To amplify region (ITS1, 5.8S rDNA, ITS2), PCR was performed using BD1 (forward; 5′-GTCGTAACAAGGTTTCCGTA-3′) and BD2 (reverse; 5′-TATGCTTAAATTCAGCGGGT-3′) primers (21). PCR reaction were performed in a total volume of 20 µl contained 1 µl DNA template, 10 mM Tris-HCl(PH=9), 250 µM dNTP, 30 mM KCl, 1.5 mM MgCl2, 1 U Taq DNA Polymerase and 10 Pmol of each primer in a thermocycler (BioRad®) under the following conditions: 95°C for 5 min as initial denaturation, followed by 30 cycles of 95°C for 30 s (denaturation), 61.6°C for 30 s (annealing), 72°C for 30 s (extension) and final extension of 72°C for 7 min. For detection of PCR results, 5 µl of the PCR product was examined on 1.5% agarose gel in TAE buffer at 80 V for 45 min. The gels stained with ethidium bromide, visualized, and photographed using a transilluminator (UVITEC). To estimate the size of the amplicons, a 100bp DNA ladder (Fermentas) was used in gels.

Sequencing and analysis

To select a suitable restriction enzyme we sequenced PCR products of 4 Fasciola samples from sheep and cattle. The sequences were analyzed and aligned using Blast (http://blast.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/Blast) and ClustalW (http://www.ebi.ac.uk/Tools/clustalw) software in comparison with sequences of Fasciola ITS1, 5.8S, ITS2 previously published from other countries in GenBank. Nucleotides of 1000bp from fasciolid species were subjected to comparison of restriction sites and selection the appropriate enzyme by Webcutter 2 using the following website: (http://bio.lundberg.gu.se/cutter2) software.

Restriction Fragment Length Polymorphism (RFLP)

Tsp509I fast digest restriction enzyme (Fermentas®) was selected for RFLP method that caused the separation specifically of Fasciola species. To performance RFLP, 3 µl of Fasciola ITS1, 5.8S, ITS2 PCR product, 1 µl of supplied restriction enzyme buffer, 0.5 µl of restriction enzyme, and 10.5 µl DDW in total volume 15 µl were incubated at 65°C for 1 h. Digestion products were analyzed and photographed on 2.5% agarose gel.

Results

In this investigation, 90 Fasciola isolates were studied from two hosts and three geographical regions of Iran. Seventy F. hepatica and 20 F.gigantica were identified (Table 1). Genomic DNA was extracted from 90 isolates, which could amplify a fragment approximately 1000bp in all of the samples. Negative control did not produce any band on the gels. All amplified products of Fasciola were digested with the Tsp509I restriction endonuclease. After digestion, the PCR-RFLP profile was obtained from F. hepatica and F. gigantica. RFLP pattern from F. hepatica, which had 3 cutting sites, produced 102, 171, 343 and 427 bp fragments while 5 fragments were produced by 4 cutting sites from F. gigantica including 102, 171, 208, 219 and 343 bp without 427 bp fragment (Fig. 1).
Fig. 1

PCR-RFLP pattern of Fasciola after digestion with Tsp509I restriction enzyme. Lane M: 100bp DNA ladder, Lanes 1 and 2: F. hepatica from sheep, Lane 3: F. gigantica from sheep, Lanes 4 and 6: F. hepatica from cattle, Lane 5: F. gigantica from cattle

PCR-RFLP pattern of Fasciola after digestion with Tsp509I restriction enzyme. Lane M: 100bp DNA ladder, Lanes 1 and 2: F. hepatica from sheep, Lane 3: F. gigantica from sheep, Lanes 4 and 6: F. hepatica from cattle, Lane 5: F. gigantica from cattle ITS1, 5.8S rDNA, ITS2 sequence of F. hepatica and F. gigantica were analyzed and deposited in GenBank (Accession numbers: HM74678.-HM74678.). Ninety-nine percent similarities were obtained in comparison of these sequences with all available data of Fasciola spp. in GenBank (Fig. 2). Restriction sites of the nucleotides in the Fasciola species were studied by computer software for selection a suitable enzyme. Accordingly, Tsp509I was selected as one of the best restriction enzyme for differentiation between Fasciola isolates.
Fig. 2

Sequence alignment of the ITS1, 5.8S rDNA, ITS2 region from Fasciola hepatica and Fasciola gigantica. Accession numbers: HM746785, HM746786 (F. hepatica) and HM746787, HM746788 (F. gigantica) are sequences that have been deposited in GenBank from Iran

Sequence alignment of the ITS1, 5.8S rDNA, ITS2 region from Fasciola hepatica and Fasciola gigantica. Accession numbers: HM746785, HM746786 (F. hepatica) and HM746787, HM746788 (F. gigantica) are sequences that have been deposited in GenBank from Iran

Discussion

Differentiation between species of Fasciola according to life cycle and species-specific intermediate host is necessary (1). DNA-based methods in comparison with other diagnostic methods for Fasciola parasites have more accuracy (13). In this study, a rapid and simple method was developed to differentiate Fasciola species by PCR-RFLP assay. This method was used in some studies for identification of Fasciola based on 28s rRNA, 18s rRNA, ITS1 and ITS2 (13–17). AvaII and DraII restriction enzymes were used for RFLP method based on 618 bp sequence of the 28s rRNA gene, but no interaspecific variations were detected in this sequence because there were a few nucleotide differences between Fasciola species (13). 361-362 bp of the ITS2 sequence of Fasciola samples from France and China were compared by PCR-RFLP assay with Hsp92II restriction enzyme (14). In Iran, RFLP patterns of Fasciola hepatica and Fasciola gigantica from Fars province based on 263 and 356 bp fragments of 18s rDNA using DraI and BfrI restriction enzymes showed that BfrI restriction enzyme was obtained similar bands profile of F.hepatica and F.gigantica whereas, restriction enzyme DraI can be created to differentiate between two species of Fasciola (15). No evidence of restriction digestion in RFLP patterns of the ITS2 sequence of Fasciola hepatica samples was seen from Zanjan obtained with BamH1 and PagI restriction enzymes (16). In another study, Fasciola samples from Tehran, West Azerbaijan and Khuzestan provinces were identified by PCR-restriction enzyme method based on 463 bp region of the ITS1 sequence with restriction enzyme TasI (17). Various studies have indicated that, Internal Transcribed Spacer (ITS1 and ITS2) sequence was suitable genetic markers for genotyping, interaspecific variations, and phylogenetic studies of parasites (14, 18). In the previous studies, only ITS1 or ITS2 were used for differentiation of Fasciola based on RFLP assay (14, 16, 17). In our study, we used 1000bp region contained ITS1, 5.8S and ITS2 for identification and differentiation of Fasciola isolates by PCR-RFLP method. Indeed, we designed the PCR-RFLP assay for differentiation of Fasciola using both ITS1 and ITS2 regions. On the other hand, ITS1 and ITS2 of Fasciola samples amplified at one PCR reaction, which used for sequencing to provide other studies such as phylogeny and genotyping. Moreover, both F. hepatica and F. gigantica samples were digested with Tsp509I restriction enzyme, which showed different RFLP patterns. According to our result, all ninety Fasciola samples from three different geographical regions (Khorasan, Fars and East Azerbaijan provinces) and two different hosts (sheep and cattle) were identified as either F. hepatica or F. gigantica by PCR-RFLP. In conclusion, the new PCR-RFLP assay using Tsp509I restriction enzyme provides a simple, practical, fast, low cost, and reliable method for identification and differentiation of Fasciola isolates.
  11 in total

1.  Comparisons of ribosomal internal transcribed spacers from two congeneric species of flukes (Platyhelminthes: Trematoda: Digenea).

Authors:  K Luton; D Walker; D Blair
Journal:  Mol Biochem Parasitol       Date:  1992-12       Impact factor: 1.759

Review 2.  Fascioliasis and other plant-borne trematode zoonoses.

Authors:  S Mas-Coma; M D Bargues; M A Valero
Journal:  Int J Parasitol       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 3.981

3.  A PCR-RFLP assay for the distinction between Fasciola hepatica and Fasciola gigantica.

Authors:  A Marcilla; M D Bargues; S Mas-Coma
Journal:  Mol Cell Probes       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 2.365

4.  Animal fascioliasis in Khuzestan, southwestern Iran.

Authors:  G H Sahba; F Arfaa; I Farahmandian; H Jalali
Journal:  J Parasitol       Date:  1972-08       Impact factor: 1.276

5.  Control of foodborne trematode infections. Report of a WHO Study Group.

Authors: 
Journal:  World Health Organ Tech Rep Ser       Date:  1995

6.  Molecular identification of the Indian liver fluke, Fasciola (Trematoda: Fasciolidae) based on the ribosomal internal transcribed spacer regions.

Authors:  P K Prasad; V Tandon; D K Biswal; L M Goswami; A Chatterjee
Journal:  Parasitol Res       Date:  2008-08-12       Impact factor: 2.289

7.  Identification and differentiation of Fasciola hepatica and Fasciola gigantica using a simple PCR-restriction enzyme method.

Authors:  Mohammad Bagher Rokni; Hossein Mirhendi; Azadeh Mizani; Mehdi Mohebali; Mitra Sharbatkhori; Eshrat Beigom Kia; Hamid Abdoli; Shahrokh Izadi
Journal:  Exp Parasitol       Date:  2009-09-19       Impact factor: 2.011

8.  Characterisation of Fasciola species from Mainland China by ITS-2 ribosomal DNA sequence.

Authors:  W Y Huang; B He; C R Wang; X Q Zhu
Journal:  Vet Parasitol       Date:  2004-02-26       Impact factor: 2.738

9.  Triploid form of Fasciola in Japan: genetic relationships between Fasciola hepatica and Fasciola gigantica determined by ITS-2 sequence of nuclear rDNA.

Authors:  T Itagaki; K Tsutsumi
Journal:  Int J Parasitol       Date:  1998-05       Impact factor: 3.981

Review 10.  The present status of human helminthic diseases in Iran.

Authors:  M B Rokni
Journal:  Ann Trop Med Parasitol       Date:  2008-06
View more
  13 in total

1.  Differential diagnosis and molecular characterization of Hymenolepis nana and Hymenolepis diminuta (Cestoda: Cyclophyllidea: Hymenolepididae) based on nuclear rDNA ITS2 gene marker.

Authors:  Sunil Sharma; Damanbha Lyngdoh; Bishnupada Roy; Veena Tandon
Journal:  Parasitol Res       Date:  2016-07-30       Impact factor: 2.289

2.  Genotyping and Phylogenetic Analysis of Fasciola Spp. Isolated from Sheep and Cattle Using PCR-RFLP in Ardabil Province, Northwestern Iran.

Authors:  Mojgan Aryaeipour; Soheila Rouhani; Mojgan Bandehpour; Hadi Mirahmadi; Bahram Kazemi; Mohammad Bagher Rokni
Journal:  Iran J Public Health       Date:  2014-10       Impact factor: 1.429

3.  Morphological and molecular discrimination of fasciola species isolated from domestic ruminants of urmia city, iran.

Authors:  Mohammad Yakhchali; Reza Malekzadeh-Viayeh; Abbas Imani-Baran; Karim Mardani
Journal:  Iran J Parasitol       Date:  2015 Jan-Mar       Impact factor: 1.012

4.  A case of Fasciola hepatica infection mimicking cholangiocarcinoma and ITS-1 sequencing of the worm.

Authors:  Bong Kyun Kang; Bong-Kwang Jung; Yoon Suk Lee; In Kyeom Hwang; Hyemi Lim; Jaeeun Cho; Jin-Hyeok Hwang; Jong-Yil Chai
Journal:  Korean J Parasitol       Date:  2014-04-18       Impact factor: 1.341

5.  PCR-RFLP Analysis of 28 SrDNA for Specification of Fasciola gigantica (Cobbold, 1855) in the Infected Lymnaea auricularia (Linnaeus, 1785) Snails from Northwestern Iran.

Authors:  Mohammad Yakhchali; Reza Malekzadeh-Viayeh; Abass Imani-Baran
Journal:  Iran J Parasitol       Date:  2014-09       Impact factor: 1.012

Review 6.  The Status of Human and Animal Fascioliasis in Iran: A Narrative Review Article.

Authors:  Keyhan Ashrafi
Journal:  Iran J Parasitol       Date:  2015 Jul-Sep       Impact factor: 1.012

7.  Prevalence of Animal Fasciolosis and Specification of Fasciola spp. Isolated from Sheep, Goats and Cattle by Molecular Method: Hamadan Province, West of Iran.

Authors:  Kobra Piri; Massoud Saidijam; Amirhossein Maghsood; Mohammad Matini; Mohammad Fallah
Journal:  Iran J Parasitol       Date:  2018 Oct-Dec       Impact factor: 1.012

8.  A Consistent PCR-RFLP Assay Based on ITS-2 Ribosomal DNA for Differentiation of Fasciola Species.

Authors:  Reza Shafiei; Bahador Sarkari; Abdolali Moshfe
Journal:  Iran J Basic Med Sci       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 2.699

9.  Genetic Characterization of Fasciola Isolates from West Azerbaijan Province Iran Based on ITS1 and ITS2 Sequence of Ribosomal DNA.

Authors:  Hossein Galavani; Saber Gholizadeh; Khosrow Hazrati Tappeh
Journal:  Iran J Parasitol       Date:  2016 Jan-Mar       Impact factor: 1.012

10.  Molecular Determination of Fasciola Spp. Isolates from Domestic Ruminants Fecal Samples in the Northwest of Iran.

Authors:  Abbas Imani Baran; Habib Cheraghi Saray; Farzad Katiraee
Journal:  Iran J Parasitol       Date:  2017 Apr-Jun       Impact factor: 1.012

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.