| Literature DB >> 22347275 |
Kh Pirali-Kheirabadi1, Ja Teixeira da Silva.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to investigate the 'acaricidal effect' of Zataria multiflora and Artemisia annua essential oils on Rhipicephalus (Boophilus) annulatus.Entities:
Keywords: Artemisia Annua; Botanical Acaricidal Agents; Essential Oil; Rhipicephalus (Boophilus) Annulatus; Zataria Multiflora
Year: 2011 PMID: 22347275 PMCID: PMC3279866
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Iran J Parasitol ISSN: 1735-7020 Impact factor: 1.012
Fig. 1Comparison of a Zataria-treated dead tick (left) with a non-treated live tick (right). Tick inoculated with Zataria essential oil shows major signs of death including a dark cuticle, immobilized Malpighian tubes, and haemorrhagic swelling skin lesions (arrow). In the non-treated live tick, the colour of the cuticle is normal and motile Malpighian tubes are easily visible (arrow). Egg-laying has stopped in the dead tick (obviously; left), but it is normal for the live control tick (right).
Mortality rate (mean±SEM; n=30) of Rhipicephalus (B) annulatus exposed to different concentrations of Z. multiflora and A. annua essential oils
| Dose (µL/cm3) | hpi exposed to | hpi exposed to | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6 hpi | 15 hpi | 24 hpi | 6 hpi | 15 hpi | 24 hpi | |
| 0.0 (control) | 0.0±0.188a | 0.00±0.20 | 0.0±0.1a (0%) | 0.0±0.16ea | 0.0±0.07a | 0.0±0.15ea (0%) |
| 5 | 0.00±0.462da | 0.00±0.40 | 0.0±0.24a (0%) | 0.0±0.42ea | 0.0±0.17a | 0.0±0.39e (0%) |
| 10 | 2.0±0.462b | 2.66±0.40 | 2.66±0.24b (26.6%) | 0.0±0.42a | 0.0±0.17a | 0.0±0.39a (0%) |
| 20 | 3.32±0.462b | 3.98±0.40 | 4.66±0.24c (46.6%) | 3.32±0.42b | 3.32±0.17a | 3.32±0.39b (33.2%) |
| 40 | 8.68±0.462c | 10±0.40 | 10.00±0.24d (100%) | 4.0±0.42b | 4.0±0.17a | 4.00±0.39b (40%) |
| 60 | 9.34±0.462c | 10±0.40 | 10.00±0.24d (100%) | 7.34±0.42c | 7.34±0.17b | 8.66±0.39c (86.60%) |
| 80 | 9.34±0.462c | 10±0.40 | 10.00±0.24d (100%) | 9.32±0.42d | 9.32±0.17a | 10.00±0.39d (100%) |
Different letters within a column indicate significant differences between treatments (P<0.05)
hpi: hours post inoculation
Failure in egg laying (mean±SEM; n=30) and mass of produced eggs of Rhipicephalus (B) annulatus engorged females exposed to different concentrations of. Z. multiflora and A. annua essential oils
| Dose (µL/cm3) | Ticks exposed to | Ticks exposed to | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MPE (g) | ELF (%) | MPE (g) | ELF (%) | |
| 0.0 (control) | 1.22±0.01a | 0.0 | 1.22±0.01ad | 0.0 |
| 5 | 1.16±0.04a | 4.92 | 1.14±0.042d | 0.0 |
| 10 | 0.58±0.04b | 52.46 | 1.22±0.042a | 6.56 |
| 20 | 0.43±0.04d | 65.58 | 0.36±0.042b | 70.50 |
| 40 | 0.0±0.04e | 100 | 0.32±0.042b | 73.78 |
| 60 | 0.0±0.04e | 100 | 0.46±0.042c | 96.23 |
| 80 | 0.0±0.04e | 100 | 0.00±0.042c | 100.00 |
Different letters within a column indicate significant differences between treatments (P<0.05).
hpi: hours post inoculation
MPE: mass produced eggs
ELF: egg laying failure