Literature DB >> 22347045

4-(Pyridin-2-yl)-1,3-dithiol-2-one.

Guoquan Zhou, Xinzhi Chen.   

Abstract

In the title compound, C(8)H(5)NOS(2), the non-H atoms are approximately coplanar [maxium deviation = 0.060 (3) Å]. The dihedral angle between the least-squares planes of the pyridine and 1,3-dithiol-2-one rings is 5.96 (17)°. The crystal packing is stabilized by weak inter-molecular C-H⋯O hydrogen bonds and by an S⋯S close contact [3.510 (5) Å].

Entities:  

Year:  2012        PMID: 22347045      PMCID: PMC3275189          DOI: 10.1107/S1600536812001407

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Crystallogr Sect E Struct Rep Online        ISSN: 1600-5368


Related literature

For background to the chemistry of pyridine-based tetra­thia­fulvalenes, see: Fabre (2004 ▶); Zhu et al. (2010 ▶). For the preparation and crystal structures of related compounds, see: Zhu et al. (2010 ▶); Han et al. (2007 ▶).

Experimental

Crystal data

C8H5NOS2 M = 195.27 Orthorhombic, a = 11.157 (2) Å b = 5.3216 (10) Å c = 13.689 (3) Å V = 812.8 (3) Å3 Z = 4 Mo Kα radiation μ = 0.60 mm−1 T = 223 K 0.60 × 0.25 × 0.20 mm

Data collection

Rigaku Saturn CCD diffractometer Absorption correction: multi-scan (REQAB; Jacobson, 1998 ▶) T min = 0.564, T max = 0.887 2825 measured reflections 1215 independent reflections 1144 reflections with I > 2σ(I) R int = 0.027

Refinement

R[F 2 > 2σ(F 2)] = 0.032 wR(F 2) = 0.081 S = 1.10 1215 reflections 110 parameters 1 restraint H-atom parameters constrained Δρmax = 0.18 e Å−3 Δρmin = −0.23 e Å−3 Absolute structure: Flack (1983 ▶), 430 Friedel pairs Flack parameter: −0.09 (11) Data collection: CrystalClear (Rigaku, 2005 ▶); cell refinement: CrystalClear; data reduction: CrystalStructure (Rigaku, 2005 ▶); program(s) used to solve structure: SHELXS97 (Sheldrick, 2008 ▶); program(s) used to refine structure: SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 2008 ▶); molecular graphics: ORTEP-3 for Windows (Farrugia, 1997 ▶); software used to prepare material for publication: SHELXTL (Sheldrick, 2008 ▶). Crystal structure: contains datablock(s) I, global. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536812001407/pk2379sup1.cif Structure factors: contains datablock(s) I. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536812001407/pk2379Isup2.hkl Supplementary material file. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536812001407/pk2379Isup3.cml Additional supplementary materials: crystallographic information; 3D view; checkCIF report
C8H5NOS2F(000) = 400
Mr = 195.27Dx = 1.596 Mg m3
Orthorhombic, Pna21Mo Kα radiation, λ = 0.71075 Å
Hall symbol: P 2c -2nCell parameters from 2396 reflections
a = 11.157 (2) Åθ = 3.5–27.5°
b = 5.3216 (10) ŵ = 0.60 mm1
c = 13.689 (3) ÅT = 223 K
V = 812.8 (3) Å3Block, colorless
Z = 40.60 × 0.25 × 0.20 mm
Rigaku Saturn CCD diffractometer1215 independent reflections
Radiation source: fine-focus sealed tube1144 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
graphiteRint = 0.027
Detector resolution: 14.63 pixels mm-1θmax = 25.5°, θmin = 3.9°
ω scansh = −10→13
Absorption correction: multi-scan (REQAB; Jacobson, 1998)k = −6→5
Tmin = 0.564, Tmax = 0.887l = −15→16
2825 measured reflections
Refinement on F2Secondary atom site location: difference Fourier map
Least-squares matrix: fullHydrogen site location: inferred from neighbouring sites
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.032H-atom parameters constrained
wR(F2) = 0.081w = 1/[σ2(Fo2) + (0.0458P)2 + 0.0545P] where P = (Fo2 + 2Fc2)/3
S = 1.10(Δ/σ)max = 0.001
1215 reflectionsΔρmax = 0.18 e Å3
110 parametersΔρmin = −0.23 e Å3
1 restraintAbsolute structure: Flack (1983), 430 Friedel pairs
Primary atom site location: structure-invariant direct methodsFlack parameter: −0.09 (11)
Geometry. All e.s.d.'s (except the e.s.d. in the dihedral angle between two l.s. planes) are estimated using the full covariance matrix. The cell e.s.d.'s are taken into account individually in the estimation of e.s.d.'s in distances, angles and torsion angles; correlations between e.s.d.'s in cell parameters are only used when they are defined by crystal symmetry. An approximate (isotropic) treatment of cell e.s.d.'s is used for estimating e.s.d.'s involving l.s. planes.
Refinement. Refinement of F2 against ALL reflections. The weighted R-factor wR and goodness of fit S are based on F2, conventional R-factors R are based on F, with F set to zero for negative F2. The threshold expression of F2 > σ(F2) is used only for calculating R-factors(gt) etc. and is not relevant to the choice of reflections for refinement. R-factors based on F2 are statistically about twice as large as those based on F, and R- factors based on ALL data will be even larger.
xyzUiso*/Ueq
S10.29937 (7)1.06740 (15)0.65200 (6)0.0415 (2)
S20.53107 (7)1.18329 (17)0.55954 (7)0.0439 (2)
O10.3307 (3)1.4374 (5)0.52711 (19)0.0562 (7)
N10.2818 (2)0.6783 (5)0.7860 (2)0.0407 (7)
C30.4232 (3)0.8896 (6)0.6876 (2)0.0329 (7)
C40.3981 (3)0.6970 (6)0.7623 (2)0.0328 (7)
C80.2525 (4)0.5068 (7)0.8529 (3)0.0482 (9)
H80.17130.49310.87040.058*
C70.3323 (4)0.3487 (7)0.8980 (3)0.0474 (9)
H70.30680.22740.94340.057*
C60.4513 (4)0.3754 (7)0.8740 (3)0.0443 (8)
H60.50910.27380.90470.053*
C50.4867 (3)0.5504 (6)0.8052 (3)0.0380 (8)
H50.56780.56950.78800.046*
C20.5273 (3)0.9427 (6)0.6451 (2)0.0349 (7)
H20.59700.85230.66090.042*
C10.3772 (3)1.2650 (6)0.5707 (2)0.0414 (8)
U11U22U33U12U13U23
S10.0314 (4)0.0446 (5)0.0484 (5)0.0045 (3)−0.0023 (4)0.0054 (5)
S20.0388 (5)0.0469 (5)0.0459 (4)−0.0031 (4)−0.0006 (4)0.0105 (4)
O10.0569 (16)0.0481 (15)0.0636 (18)0.0060 (12)−0.0125 (14)0.0169 (13)
N10.0335 (15)0.0428 (17)0.0456 (16)−0.0022 (13)0.0034 (13)0.0024 (15)
C30.0306 (17)0.0326 (16)0.0354 (16)−0.0010 (14)−0.0022 (13)−0.0021 (14)
C40.0295 (16)0.0326 (17)0.0362 (16)0.0008 (14)−0.0022 (14)−0.0008 (14)
C80.0369 (18)0.057 (2)0.051 (2)−0.0075 (19)0.0089 (17)−0.001 (2)
C70.057 (2)0.0413 (19)0.044 (2)−0.0030 (19)0.0045 (17)0.0009 (17)
C60.051 (2)0.0404 (18)0.0418 (18)0.0073 (17)−0.0046 (16)0.0032 (17)
C50.0345 (18)0.041 (2)0.0383 (18)−0.0006 (17)0.0015 (14)−0.0001 (16)
C20.0292 (15)0.0358 (16)0.0397 (18)0.0020 (13)−0.0029 (17)0.0013 (15)
C10.0367 (17)0.0442 (18)0.0433 (18)−0.0036 (15)−0.0062 (17)−0.0061 (18)
S1—C31.744 (3)C4—C51.390 (5)
S1—C11.760 (4)C8—C71.372 (5)
S2—C21.736 (3)C8—H80.9400
S2—C11.778 (4)C7—C61.375 (6)
O1—C11.211 (4)C7—H70.9400
N1—C81.334 (5)C6—C51.382 (5)
N1—C41.342 (4)C6—H60.9400
C3—C21.329 (5)C5—H50.9400
C3—C41.474 (4)C2—H20.9400
C3—S1—C196.32 (17)C6—C7—H7121.4
C2—S2—C195.66 (16)C7—C6—C5120.5 (4)
C8—N1—C4117.0 (3)C7—C6—H6119.7
C2—C3—C4128.1 (3)C5—C6—H6119.7
C2—C3—S1117.0 (2)C6—C5—C4117.6 (3)
C4—C3—S1114.8 (2)C6—C5—H5121.2
N1—C4—C5123.0 (3)C4—C5—H5121.2
N1—C4—C3113.8 (3)C3—C2—S2118.3 (2)
C5—C4—C3123.2 (3)C3—C2—H2120.9
N1—C8—C7124.7 (4)S2—C2—H2120.9
N1—C8—H8117.6O1—C1—S1123.6 (3)
C7—C8—H8117.6O1—C1—S2123.8 (3)
C8—C7—C6117.1 (4)S1—C1—S2112.63 (19)
C8—C7—H7121.4
C1—S1—C3—C2−2.3 (3)C7—C6—C5—C40.3 (6)
C1—S1—C3—C4177.7 (2)N1—C4—C5—C61.2 (5)
C8—N1—C4—C5−1.1 (5)C3—C4—C5—C6−179.7 (3)
C8—N1—C4—C3179.7 (3)C4—C3—C2—S2−179.5 (2)
C2—C3—C4—N1−175.8 (3)S1—C3—C2—S20.5 (4)
S1—C3—C4—N14.3 (4)C1—S2—C2—C31.5 (3)
C2—C3—C4—C55.1 (5)C3—S1—C1—O1−177.0 (3)
S1—C3—C4—C5−174.9 (3)C3—S1—C1—S23.1 (2)
C4—N1—C8—C7−0.4 (5)C2—S2—C1—O1177.2 (3)
N1—C8—C7—C61.9 (6)C2—S2—C1—S1−2.9 (2)
C8—C7—C6—C5−1.7 (6)
D—H···AD—HH···AD···AD—H···A
C7—H7···O1i0.942.463.3486158
Table 1

Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, °)

D—H⋯AD—HH⋯ADAD—H⋯A
C7—H7⋯O1i0.942.463.3486158

Symmetry code: (i) .

  2 in total

1.  Synthesis strategies and chemistry of nonsymmetrically substituted tetrachalcogenafulvalenes.

Authors:  J M Fabre
Journal:  Chem Rev       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 60.622

2.  A short history of SHELX.

Authors:  George M Sheldrick
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr A       Date:  2007-12-21       Impact factor: 2.290

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.