Literature DB >> 22346966

Bis(2-hy-droxy-ethanaminium) terephthalate.

Yu Jin1.   

Abstract

The asymmetric unit of the title salt, 2C(2)H(8)NO(+)·C(8)H(4)O(4) (2-), comprises one crystallographically independent 2-hy-droxy-ethanaminium cation and one half terephthalate anion. In the crystal, hydrogen bonds involving the hy-droxy and ammonium groups of the cations and the carboxyl-ate O atoms of the terephthalate anions result in the formation of a three-dimensional network structure.

Entities:  

Year:  2012        PMID: 22346966      PMCID: PMC3275021          DOI: 10.1107/S1600536812000293

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Crystallogr Sect E Struct Rep Online        ISSN: 1600-5368


Related literature

For compounds containing the terephthalate anion, see: Zhang et al. (2005 ▶); Smith & Wermuth (2010 ▶); Karpova et al. (2004 ▶). For their physical properties, see: Ye et al. (2006 ▶); Zhang et al. (2008 ▶, 2009 ▶, 2010 ▶); Fu et al. (2009 ▶); Wu et al. (2011 ▶).

Experimental

Crystal data

2C2H8NOC8H4O4 2− M = 288.30 Monoclinic, a = 9.3578 (19) Å b = 7.8579 (16) Å c = 9.844 (2) Å β = 110.53 (3)° V = 677.9 (2) Å3 Z = 2 Mo Kα radiation μ = 0.11 mm−1 T = 293 K 0.3 × 0.3 × 0.2 mm

Data collection

Rigaku Mercury CCD diffractometer Absorption correction: multi-scan (CrystalClear; Rigaku, 2005 ▶) T min = 0.489, T max = 1.000 6639 measured reflections 1558 independent reflections 1270 reflections with I > 2σ(I) R int = 0.068

Refinement

R[F 2 > 2σ(F 2)] = 0.044 wR(F 2) = 0.108 S = 1.05 1558 reflections 92 parameters H-atom parameters constrained Δρmax = 0.29 e Å−3 Δρmin = −0.21 e Å−3 Data collection: CrystalClear (Rigaku, 2005 ▶); cell refinement: CrystalClear; data reduction: CrystalClear; program(s) used to solve structure: SHELXS97 (Sheldrick, 2008 ▶); program(s) used to refine structure: SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 2008 ▶); molecular graphics: SHELXTL (Sheldrick, 2008 ▶); software used to prepare material for publication: SHELXL97. Crystal structure: contains datablock(s) I, global. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536812000293/bx2389sup1.cif Structure factors: contains datablock(s) I. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536812000293/bx2389Isup2.hkl Supplementary material file. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536812000293/bx2389Isup3.cml Additional supplementary materials: crystallographic information; 3D view; checkCIF report
2C2H8NO+·C8H4O42F(000) = 308
Mr = 288.30Dx = 1.412 Mg m3
Monoclinic, P21/nMo Kα radiation, λ = 0.71073 Å
Hall symbol: -P 2ynCell parameters from 3450 reflections
a = 9.3578 (19) Åθ = 6.2–55.3°
b = 7.8579 (16) ŵ = 0.11 mm1
c = 9.844 (2) ÅT = 293 K
β = 110.53 (3)°Block, colorless
V = 677.9 (2) Å30.3 × 0.3 × 0.2 mm
Z = 2
Rigaku Mercury CCD diffractometer1558 independent reflections
Radiation source: fine-focus sealed tube1270 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
graphiteRint = 0.068
ω scansθmax = 27.5°, θmin = 3.4°
Absorption correction: multi-scan (CrystalClear; Rigaku, 2005)h = −12→12
Tmin = 0.489, Tmax = 1.000k = −10→10
6639 measured reflectionsl = −12→12
Refinement on F2Secondary atom site location: difference Fourier map
Least-squares matrix: fullHydrogen site location: inferred from neighbouring sites
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.044H-atom parameters constrained
wR(F2) = 0.108w = 1/[σ2(Fo2) + (0.0417P)2 + 0.0687P] where P = (Fo2 + 2Fc2)/3
S = 1.05(Δ/σ)max < 0.001
1558 reflectionsΔρmax = 0.29 e Å3
92 parametersΔρmin = −0.20 e Å3
0 restraintsExtinction correction: SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 2008), Fc*=kFc[1+0.001xFc2λ3/sin(2θ)]-1/4
Primary atom site location: structure-invariant direct methodsExtinction coefficient: 0.330 (17)
Geometry. All e.s.d.'s (except the e.s.d. in the dihedral angle between two l.s. planes) are estimated using the full covariance matrix. The cell e.s.d.'s are taken into account individually in the estimation of e.s.d.'s in distances, angles and torsion angles; correlations between e.s.d.'s in cell parameters are only used when they are defined by crystal symmetry. An approximate (isotropic) treatment of cell e.s.d.'s is used for estimating e.s.d.'s involving l.s. planes.
Refinement. Refinement of F2 against ALL reflections. The weighted R-factor wR and goodness of fit S are based on F2, conventional R-factors R are based on F, with F set to zero for negative F2. The threshold expression of F2 > σ(F2) is used only for calculating R-factors(gt) etc. and is not relevant to the choice of reflections for refinement. R-factors based on F2 are statistically about twice as large as those based on F, and R- factors based on ALL data will be even larger.
xyzUiso*/Ueq
C10.52569 (16)0.15091 (18)0.33959 (14)0.0269 (3)
H1D0.55970.05140.40070.032*
H1E0.61410.22020.34760.032*
C20.44639 (17)0.09872 (18)0.18647 (14)0.0280 (4)
H2A0.41380.19920.12620.034*
H2B0.51640.03560.15250.034*
C31.10759 (16)0.09307 (16)0.46571 (14)0.0229 (3)
H3A1.18090.15520.44320.028*
C40.97258 (15)0.04996 (15)0.35739 (12)0.0196 (3)
C50.86558 (16)−0.04471 (16)0.39320 (14)0.0226 (3)
H5A0.7747−0.07580.32090.027*
C60.93996 (16)0.10265 (16)0.20297 (13)0.0216 (3)
N10.31233 (13)−0.00831 (14)0.17323 (11)0.0251 (3)
H1B0.2661−0.03800.08090.038*
H1C0.24770.05000.20360.038*
H1F0.3425−0.10140.22720.038*
O10.42127 (12)0.24468 (13)0.38314 (11)0.0356 (3)
H1A0.45840.26420.47040.053*
O20.81514 (12)0.05985 (13)0.11320 (10)0.0318 (3)
O31.04092 (11)0.18757 (12)0.17413 (10)0.0281 (3)
U11U22U33U12U13U23
C10.0241 (8)0.0296 (7)0.0252 (8)−0.0011 (6)0.0065 (6)−0.0043 (5)
C20.0305 (8)0.0314 (7)0.0234 (8)−0.0052 (6)0.0111 (6)−0.0034 (5)
C30.0221 (7)0.0273 (7)0.0189 (7)−0.0028 (5)0.0065 (6)0.0027 (5)
C40.0222 (7)0.0210 (6)0.0144 (7)0.0021 (5)0.0047 (6)0.0004 (5)
C50.0192 (7)0.0281 (7)0.0166 (7)−0.0013 (5)0.0016 (6)0.0002 (5)
C60.0267 (8)0.0214 (6)0.0153 (7)0.0039 (5)0.0057 (6)0.0009 (5)
N10.0293 (7)0.0247 (6)0.0182 (6)−0.0022 (5)0.0045 (5)−0.0027 (4)
O10.0294 (6)0.0461 (7)0.0268 (6)0.0065 (5)0.0041 (5)−0.0143 (4)
O20.0281 (6)0.0443 (6)0.0166 (6)−0.0036 (4)0.0000 (5)0.0042 (4)
O30.0340 (6)0.0312 (6)0.0187 (5)−0.0054 (4)0.0086 (4)0.0040 (4)
C1—O11.4055 (15)C4—C51.3885 (18)
C1—C21.485 (2)C4—C61.5000 (17)
C1—H1D0.9700C5—C3i1.3755 (18)
C1—H1E0.9700C5—H5A0.9300
C2—N11.4776 (17)C6—O21.2387 (18)
C2—H2A0.9700C6—O31.2676 (15)
C2—H2B0.9700N1—H1B0.8900
C3—C5i1.3755 (18)N1—H1C0.8900
C3—C41.3795 (19)N1—H1F0.8900
C3—H3A0.9300O1—H1A0.8200
O1—C1—C2107.52 (11)C3—C4—C6121.42 (12)
O1—C1—H1D110.2C5—C4—C6119.78 (12)
C2—C1—H1D110.2C3i—C5—C4120.79 (13)
O1—C1—H1E110.2C3i—C5—H5A119.6
C2—C1—H1E110.2C4—C5—H5A119.6
H1D—C1—H1E108.5O2—C6—O3125.00 (12)
N1—C2—C1110.69 (10)O2—C6—C4117.00 (12)
N1—C2—H2A109.5O3—C6—C4118.01 (12)
C1—C2—H2A109.5C2—N1—H1B109.5
N1—C2—H2B109.5C2—N1—H1C109.5
C1—C2—H2B109.5H1B—N1—H1C109.5
H2A—C2—H2B108.1C2—N1—H1F109.5
C5i—C3—C4120.40 (12)H1B—N1—H1F109.5
C5i—C3—H3A119.8H1C—N1—H1F109.5
C4—C3—H3A119.8C1—O1—H1A109.5
C3—C4—C5118.81 (11)
D—H···AD—HH···AD···AD—H···A
O1—H1A···O3ii0.821.922.7373 (15)179
N1—H1F···O3iii0.892.032.8995 (16)164
N1—H1C···O3iv0.892.152.9725 (16)154
N1—H1B···O2v0.891.802.6792 (15)169
Table 1

Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, °)

D—H⋯AD—HH⋯ADAD—H⋯A
O1—H1A⋯O3i0.821.922.7373 (15)179
N1—H1F⋯O3ii0.892.032.8995 (16)164
N1—H1C⋯O3iii0.892.152.9725 (16)154
N1—H1B⋯O2iv0.891.802.6792 (15)169

Symmetry codes: (i) ; (ii) ; (iii) ; (iv) .

  6 in total

1.  Discovery of new ferroelectrics: [H2dbco]2 x [Cl3] x [CuCl3(H2O)2] x H2O (dbco = 1,4-Diaza-bicyclo[2.2.2]octane).

Authors:  Wen Zhang; Heng-Yun Ye; Hong-Ling Cai; Jia-Zhen Ge; Ren-Gen Xiong; Songping D Huang
Journal:  J Am Chem Soc       Date:  2010-06-02       Impact factor: 15.419

2.  Ferroelectric metal-organic framework with a high dielectric constant.

Authors:  Qiong Ye; Yu-Mei Song; Guo-Xi Wang; Kai Chen; Da-Wei Fu; Philip Wai Hong Chan; Jin-Song Zhu; Songping D Huang; Ren-Gen Xiong
Journal:  J Am Chem Soc       Date:  2006-05-24       Impact factor: 15.419

3.  A short history of SHELX.

Authors:  George M Sheldrick
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr A       Date:  2007-12-21       Impact factor: 2.290

4.  Three-dimensional hydrogen-bonded structures in the guanidinium salts of the monocyclic dicarboxylic acids rac-trans-cyclohexane-1,2-dicarboxylic acid (2:1, anhydrous), isophthalic acid (1:1, monohydrate) and terephthalic acid (2:1, trihydrate).

Authors:  Graham Smith; Urs D Wermuth
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr C       Date:  2010-11-06       Impact factor: 1.172

5.  3D framework containing Cu4Br4 cubane as connecting node with strong ferroelectricity.

Authors:  Wen Zhang; Ren-Gen Xiong; Songping D Huang
Journal:  J Am Chem Soc       Date:  2008-07-18       Impact factor: 15.419

6.  New ferroelectrics based on divalent metal ion alum.

Authors:  Wen Zhang; Li-Zhuang Chen; Ren-Gen Xiong; Takayoshi Nakamura; Songping D Huang
Journal:  J Am Chem Soc       Date:  2009-09-09       Impact factor: 15.419

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.