| Literature DB >> 22346709 |
Oleg Sergiyenko1, Wilmar Hernandez, Vira Tyrsa, Luis Felipe Devia Cruz, Oleg Starostenko, Mario Peña-Cabrera.
Abstract
In this paper, we propose a low-cost contact-free measurement system for both 3-D data acquisition and fast surface parameter registration by digitized points. Despite the fact that during the last decade several approaches for both contact-free measurement techniques aimed at carrying out object surface recognition and 3-D object recognition have been proposed, they often still require complex and expensive equipment. Therefore, alternative low cost solutions are in great demand. Here, two low-cost solutions to the above-mentioned problem are presented. These are two examples of practical applications of the novel passive optical scanning system presented in this paper.Entities:
Keywords: health monitoring; laser; passive scanning; robot navigation
Year: 2009 PMID: 22346709 PMCID: PMC3274130 DOI: 10.3390/s90705477
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sensors (Basel) ISSN: 1424-8220 Impact factor: 3.576
Figure 1.POS system.
Figure 2.Electric signals generated by POS system on spot and synchronous point detection.
Figure 3.Horizontal POS placement for bridge monitoring.
Figure 4.Placement of two vertical POSs for arch dam monitoring.
Figure 5.POS and LPS placement for automatic navigation task. a) General view of the system with interaction of the parts in functioning. b) Triangulation angles distance and signals from sensors and reference f (“clock” pulses).
Figure 6.Experiments using laser spot: a) on obstacle variable position. b) in order to determine coordinates (x,y).
Figure 7.90° angle measurement using a light bulb as the energy source.
Statistical data for 45° and 90° measurement angles.
| 90° | 45° | |
|---|---|---|
| Average | 90.278 | 45.316 |
| Error t | 0.142 | 0.035 |
| Median | 90.201 | 45.284 |
| standard deviation | 1.419 | 0.354 |
| Variance | 2.014 | 0.125 |
| Asymmetry coefficient | 0.302 | 0.080 |
| Range | 7.168 | 1.984 |
| Min. Value | 86.495 | 44.296 |
| Max. Value | 93.663 | 46.280 |
| Samples | 100.000 | 100.000 |
Figure 8.Signal energy attenuation and distribution in projected spot: a) striking distance 2.5 m. b) striking distance 5.0 m.
Figure 9.POS output signal amplitude variation according to rpm on mirror motor.