Literature DB >> 22346538

Implementation and evaluation of a preprinted perioperative antimicrobial prophylaxis order form in a teaching hospital.

P Au1, S Salama, C Rotstein.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To determine the effect of a preprinted perioperative antimicrobial prophylaxis order form on the appropriateness, standardization and cost of surgical prophylaxis.
DESIGN: A pre- and postintervention prospective study with evaluation of drug acquisition costs in selected surgical procedures.
SETTING: A 420-bed teaching hospital in the Hamilton-Wentworth region. PATIENTS: A three-month survey of 901 consecutive patients followed by a two-month trial period of 725 consecutive patients undergoing general surgery, orthopedic and urological procedures. INTERVENTION: A perioperative antimicrobial prophylaxis order form was developed based on guidelines from the literature and input from physician and nursing staff. The form was introduced through educational inservices and put into operation. MEASUREMENT: The measurement of antimicrobial perioperative prophylaxis appropriateness and drug acquisition costs were assessed pre- and postintroduction of the order form. Subsequently, prescriber compliance and satisfaction with the program were also evaluated.
RESULTS: Appropriateness of perioperative antimicrobial surgical prophylaxis was increased from 36% in the baseline period to 79% in the trial period (P<0.0001). A reduction of $440.71 ($23.20/procedure) in drug acquisition costs was observed for 19 matched hip and knee prosthetic surgical procedures between the baseline and trial periods. In addition, compliance with the perioperative order form rose steadily during the trial period. Physician prescribers reported that the form was used, and was appropriate and user-friendly but that it did not influence their prescribing habits. Nurses responded that the form was helpful and improved the timing of prophylaxis.
CONCLUSIONS: The perioperative antimicrobial prophylaxis order form standardized antimicrobial administration time and resulted in an increase in appropriateness. A reduction in antimicrobial costs for surgical procedures was realized. This quality improvement project has enhanced the quality of patient care.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Antimicrobial therapy; Order form; Perioperative; Prophylaxis

Year:  1998        PMID: 22346538      PMCID: PMC3250912          DOI: 10.1155/1998/681725

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Can J Infect Dis        ISSN: 1180-2332


  49 in total

Review 1.  ASHP therapeutic guidelines on antimicrobial prophylaxis in surgery. ASHP Commission on Therapeutics.

Authors: 
Journal:  Clin Pharm       Date:  1992-06

2.  Does a mailed continuing education program improve physician performance? Results of a randomized trial in antihypertensive care.

Authors:  C E Evans; R B Haynes; N J Birkett; J R Gilbert; D W Taylor; D L Sackett; M E Johnston; S A Hewson
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1986 Jan 24-31       Impact factor: 56.272

3.  Perioperative antibiotic prophylaxis for herniorrhaphy and breast surgery.

Authors:  R Platt; D F Zaleznik; C C Hopkins; E P Dellinger; A W Karchmer; C S Bryan; J F Burke; M A Wikler; S K Marino; K F Holbrook
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1990-01-18       Impact factor: 91.245

4.  Improving drug-therapy decisions through educational outreach. A randomized controlled trial of academically based "detailing".

Authors:  J Avorn; S B Soumerai
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1983-06-16       Impact factor: 91.245

5.  Drug use and expenditures in 1982.

Authors:  C Baum; D L Kennedy; M B Forbes; J K Jones
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1985-01-18       Impact factor: 56.272

6.  A study of antimicrobial misuse in a university hospital.

Authors:  D G Maki; A A Schuna
Journal:  Am J Med Sci       Date:  1978 May-Jun       Impact factor: 2.378

7.  The nationwide nosocomial infection rate. A new need for vital statistics.

Authors:  R W Haley; D H Culver; J W White; W M Morgan; T G Emori
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  1985-02       Impact factor: 4.897

8.  Use of clinical pharmacists to reduce cefamandole, cefoxitin, and ticarcillin costs.

Authors:  P W Abramowitz; E G Nold; S M Hatfield
Journal:  Am J Hosp Pharm       Date:  1982-07

9.  Cost containment through restriction of cephalosporins.

Authors:  H L Britton; T L Schwinghammer; M J Romano
Journal:  Am J Hosp Pharm       Date:  1981-12

Review 10.  Antimicrobial prophylaxis of infection.

Authors:  G M Dickinson; A L Bisno
Journal:  Infect Dis Clin North Am       Date:  1995-09       Impact factor: 5.982

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.