Literature DB >> 22345392

A bio-robotic platform for integrating internal and external mechanics during muscle-powered swimming.

Christopher T Richards1, Christofer J Clemente.   

Abstract

To explore the interplay between muscle function and propulsor shape in swimming animals, we built a robotic foot to mimic the morphology and hind limb kinematics of Xenopus laevis frogs. Four foot shapes ranging from low aspect ratio (AR = 0.74) to high (AR = 5) were compared to test whether low-AR feet produce higher propulsive drag force resulting in faster swimming. Using feedback loops, two complementary control modes were used to rotate the foot: force was transmitted to the foot either from (1) a living plantaris longus (PL) muscle stimulated in vitro or (2) an in silico mathematical model of the PL. To mimic forward swimming, foot translation was calculated in real time from fluid force measured at the foot. Therefore, bio-robot swimming emerged from muscle-fluid interactions via the feedback loop. Among in vitro-robotic trials, muscle impulse ranged from 0.12 ± 0.002 to 0.18 ± 0.007 N s and swimming velocities from 0.41 ± 0.01 to 0.43 ± 0.00 m s(-1), similar to in vivo values from prior studies. Trends in in silico-robotic data mirrored in vitro-robotic observations. Increasing AR caused a small (∼10%) increase in peak bio-robot swimming velocity. In contrast, muscle force-velocity effects were strongly dependent on foot shape. Between low- and high-AR feet, muscle impulse increased ∼50%, while peak shortening velocity decreased ∼50% resulting in a ∼20% increase in net work. However, muscle-propulsion efficiency (body center of mass work/muscle work) remained independent of AR. Thus, we demonstrate how our experimental technique is useful for quantifying the complex interplay among limb morphology, muscle mechanics and hydrodynamics.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22345392     DOI: 10.1088/1748-3182/7/1/016010

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Bioinspir Biomim        ISSN: 1748-3182            Impact factor:   2.956


  6 in total

1.  Unconstrained muscle-tendon workloops indicate resonance tuning as a mechanism for elastic limb behavior during terrestrial locomotion.

Authors:  Benjamin D Robertson; Gregory S Sawicki
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2015-10-12       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Built for rowing: frog muscle is tuned to limb morphology to power swimming.

Authors:  Christopher T Richards; Christofer J Clemente
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2013-05-15       Impact factor: 4.118

3.  A Tunable, Simplified Model for Biological Latch Mediated Spring Actuated Systems.

Authors:  Andrés Cook; Kaanthi Pandhigunta; Mason A Acevedo; Adam Walker; Rosalie L Didcock; Jackson T Castro; Declan O'Neill; Raghav Acharya; M Saad Bhamla; Philip S L Anderson; Mark Ilton
Journal:  Integr Org Biol       Date:  2022-07-30

4.  Timing matters: tuning the mechanics of a muscle-tendon unit by adjusting stimulation phase during cyclic contractions.

Authors:  Gregory S Sawicki; Benjamin D Robertson; Emanuel Azizi; Thomas J Roberts
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2015-07-31       Impact factor: 3.312

5.  Propulsive efficiency of frog swimming with different feet and swimming patterns.

Authors:  Fan Jizhuang; Zhang Wei; Yuan Bowen; Liu Gangfeng
Journal:  Biol Open       Date:  2017-04-15       Impact factor: 2.422

6.  Arm-pull thrust in human swimming and the effect of post-activation potentiation.

Authors:  Tiago M Barbosa; Jia Wen Yam; Danny Lum; Govindasamy Balasekaran; Daniel A Marinho
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-05-21       Impact factor: 4.379

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.