Literature DB >> 22345034

Payer decision-making with limited comparative and cost effectiveness data: the case of new pharmacological treatments for gout.

Michele Meltzer1, Laura T Pizzi, Eric Jutkowitz.   

Abstract

CONTEXT: The need for comparative effectiveness (CE) data continues to grow, fuelled by market demand as well as health reform. There may be an assumption that new drugs result in improved efficacy compared with the standard of care, therefore warranting premium prices. Gout treatment has recently become controversial, as expensive new drugs enter the market with limited CE data.
METHODS: The authors reviewed published clinical trials and conducted a cost effectiveness analysis on a new drug (febuxostat) versus the standard (allopurinol) to illustrate the limitations in using these data to inform evidence-based decision-making.
FINDINGS: Although febuxostat trials included allopurinol as a comparator, methodological limitations make comparative effectiveness evaluations difficult. However, when available trial data were input to a decision analytic model, the authors found that a significant reduction in febuxostat cost would be required in order for it to dominate allopurinol in cost effectiveness analysis. This case exemplifies the challenges of using clinical trial data in comparative and cost effectiveness analyses.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22345034     DOI: 10.1136/ebmed-2011-100065

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Evid Based Med        ISSN: 1356-5524


  1 in total

1.  A novel flash glucose monitoring system in patients with diabetes mellitus type 1 and 2: which are the pieces of evidence for payer decision-makers?

Authors:  Salvatore Corrao; Biagio Nativo; Giuseppe Natoli; Marika Lo Monaco; Francesco Perticone
Journal:  Intern Emerg Med       Date:  2018-05-08       Impact factor: 3.397

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.