Literature DB >> 22344617

Does a standard measure of self-reported physical disability correlate with clinician perception of impairment related to cancer screening?

David I Buckley1, Melinda M Davis, Elena M Andresen.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Adults with physical disabilities are less likely than others to receive cancer screening. It is not known, however, whether commonly used measures assess elements of physical ability necessary for successful screening. The objective of this exploratory study was to determine whether patients who reported limitations in activities of daily living (ADLs) or instrumental ADLs (IADLs) are perceived by their primary care clinicians to have physical limitations that may impede cancer screening.
METHODS: Patients at 2 rural primary care clinics were surveyed about ADLs and IADLs and about their up-to-date status for breast, cervical, and/or colorectal cancer screening. Clinicians and office staff were asked whether they believed each patient had a physical limitation that might impede screening. The agreement between patient and clinician assessments was evaluated.
RESULTS: Clinicians believed that 43% of patients with severe disability (ADLs) and 30% of patients with moderate disability (IADLs) had limitations that might affect screening. Agreement between patient and clinician assessments was low according to the kappa statistic (κ = 0.355), but had a high percentage of negative agreement (92.3%) and a low percentage of positive agreement (42.7%). Patients with ADL/IADL-related disability were less likely than nondisabled patients to be current for cervical and breast cancer screening. Patients who were viewed by clinicians as having limitations relevant for screening were less likely to be current for cervical cancer screening.
CONCLUSIONS: These results indicate that a common measure of general disability may not capture all factors relevant for cancer screening. An instrument designed to include these factors may help identify and accommodate patients who have disabilities that may impede screening.
Copyright © 2011 American Cancer Society.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22344617      PMCID: PMC3286130          DOI: 10.1002/cncr.26393

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer        ISSN: 0008-543X            Impact factor:   6.860


  18 in total

1.  Mobility impairments and use of preventive services in women with multiple sclerosis: observational study.

Authors:  E Cheng; L Myers; S Wolf; D Shatin; X P Cui; G Ellison; T Belin; B Vickrey
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2001-10-27

2.  Identifying factors associated with disability-related differences in breast cancer screening (United States).

Authors:  Mario Schootman; Donna B Jeffe
Journal:  Cancer Causes Control       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 2.506

3.  Health disparities among adults with developmental disabilities, adults with other disabilities, and adults not reporting disability in North Carolina.

Authors:  Susan M Havercamp; Donna Scandlin; Marcia Roth
Journal:  Public Health Rep       Date:  2004 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 2.792

4.  Use of cervical and breast cancer screening among women with and without functional limitations--United States, 1994-1995.

Authors: 
Journal:  MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep       Date:  1998-10-16       Impact factor: 17.586

5.  High agreement but low kappa: II. Resolving the paradoxes.

Authors:  D V Cicchetti; A R Feinstein
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  1990       Impact factor: 6.437

6.  High agreement but low kappa: I. The problems of two paradoxes.

Authors:  A R Feinstein; D V Cicchetti
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  1990       Impact factor: 6.437

7.  Vital signs: breast cancer screening among women aged 50-74 years - United States, 2008.

Authors: 
Journal:  MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep       Date:  2010-07-09       Impact factor: 17.586

8.  Mobility impairments and use of screening and preventive services.

Authors:  L I Iezzoni; E P McCarthy; R B Davis; H Siebens
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 9.308

9.  Breast and cervical cancer screening among women with physical disabilities.

Authors:  M A Nosek; C A Howland
Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  1997-12       Impact factor: 3.966

10.  Relationships between level of disability and receipt of preventive health services.

Authors:  Marguerite E Diab; Mark V Johnston
Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 3.966

View more
  3 in total

1.  Reproductive Health in Women with Physical Disability: A Conceptual Framework for the Development of New Patient-Reported Outcome Measures.

Authors:  Claire Z Kalpakjian; Jodi M Kreschmer; Mary D Slavin; Pamela A Kisala; Elisabeth H Quint; Nancy D Chiaravalloti; Natalie Jenkins; Tamara Bushnik; Dagmar Amtmann; David S Tulsky; Roxanne Madrid; Rebecca Parten; Michael Evitts; Carolyn L Grawi
Journal:  J Womens Health (Larchmt)       Date:  2020-05-19       Impact factor: 2.681

2.  Trends in colorectal cancer screening over time for persons with and without chronic disability.

Authors:  Lisa I Iezzoni; Stephen G Kurtz; Sowmya R Rao
Journal:  Disabil Health J       Date:  2016-03-24       Impact factor: 2.554

3.  Development of a new pregnancy informational and decisional needs survey for women with physical disabilities.

Authors:  Claire Z Kalpakjian; Heidi J Haapala; Susan D Ernst; Brittany R Orians; Melissa L Barber; Ashley L Wiseman; Lukonde Mulenga; Shannen Bolde; Sara Rosenblum; Gina M Jay
Journal:  Disabil Health J       Date:  2020-12-24       Impact factor: 4.615

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.