Literature DB >> 22344481

The accuracy of automatic calibration of digital pelvic radiographs using two different scale markers: a comparative study.

Jonathan A Baxter1, Timothy Barlow, Shanmugam Karthikeyan, Damian J Mayo, Richard J King.   

Abstract

We have investigated the accuracy of automatic calibration of digital pelvic radiographs using the single and double marker techniques. Both markers were applied by the radiographer at the time of routine, postoperative radiographs. Each radiograph was loaded into the TraumaCad(TM) software package which calculated the magnification and scaled the radiograph automatically. The median error of magnification in the double marker group was 1.14% when calculated automatically. The median error of the single marker was 5.98%. The relationship between true and predicted magnification was strongest in the double marker group with excellent correlation (r=0.91) and agreement (ICC<0.91). We believe that the double marker method with automatic calibration is the most reliable method of scaling a pelvic radiograph in clinical practice currently available.

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22344481     DOI: 10.5301/HIP.2012.9044

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hip Int        ISSN: 1120-7000            Impact factor:   2.135


  2 in total

1.  Dual-position calibration markers for total hip arthroplasty: theoretical comparison to fixed calibration and single marker method.

Authors:  Christoph Kolja Boese; Sebastian Wilhelm; Stefan Haneder; Philipp Lechler; Peer Eysel; Jan Bredow
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2018-06-20       Impact factor: 3.075

2.  The accuracy of external calibration markers in digital templating using the double marker and single marker method: a comparative study.

Authors:  Y Warschawski; I Shichman; S Morgan; O Shaked; S Garceau; N Amzallag; N Snir; A Gold
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  2020-08-13       Impact factor: 3.067

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.