Literature DB >> 22344406

Low frequency of cancer occurrence in same breast quadrant diagnosed with lobular neoplasia at percutaneous needle biopsy.

Louise Provencher1, Simon Jacob, Gary Côté, Jean-Charles Hogue, Christine Desbiens, Brigitte Poirier, Isabelle Raîche, Linda Le Régent, Caroline Diorio.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To determine the type of mammographic abnormality leading to needle biopsy of lobular neoplasia (LN) and define the clinical evolution of low-risk LN lesions diagnosed at needle biopsy but not surgically removed.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: This study was approved by the institutional review board, and the requirement to obtain informed consent was waived. Among 16 945 needle biopsies performed between April 1998 and August 2008, LN was determined to be the most suspicious lesion in 352 samples (2.1%) (pleomorphic and necrotic forms were excluded). Among 299 pure LN lesions that were not surgically removed, follow-up was available for 276 lesions in 275 women.
RESULTS: Needle biopsy was performed because of mammographic calcifications in 215 of the 276 lesions (77.9%) and because of mammographic masses in 35 (12.7%). The mean follow-up was 5.0 years ± 2.4 (range, 0.6-12.2 years). All 275 women underwent one mammographic follow-up, 205 (74.5%) underwent a second mammographic follow-up, and 147 (53.5%) underwent a third mammographic follow-up. Cancer was diagnosed in 27 of the 275 cases (9.8%) after a mean of 3.9 years ± 2.6 (range, 1.2-10.8 years). Only three cancers (1.1%) occurred in the same breast quadrant as the one originally diagnosed with LN at needle biopsy.
CONCLUSION: Lumpectomy of pure LN lesions may not prevent malignancy in most cases. Consequently, women with pure LN of a low-risk type diagnosed at needle biopsy are strongly encouraged to undergo a yearly breast clinical examination and yearly mammographic follow-up to detect an eventual cancer in its early stages. © RSNA, 2012.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22344406     DOI: 10.1148/radiol.11111293

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiology        ISSN: 0033-8419            Impact factor:   11.105


  3 in total

1.  Is clinical breast examination important for breast cancer detection?

Authors:  L Provencher; J C Hogue; C Desbiens; B Poirier; E Poirier; D Boudreau; M Joyal; C Diorio; N Duchesne; J Chiquette
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2016-08-12       Impact factor: 3.677

2.  Underestimation rate of lobular intraepithelial neoplasia in vacuum-assisted breast biopsy.

Authors:  Stefano Meroni; Meroni Stefano; Anna Carla Bozzini; Bozzini Anna Carla; Giancarlo Pruneri; Pruneri Giancarlo; Oana Codrina Moscovici; Moscovici Oana Codrina; Patrick Maisonneuve; Maisonneuve Patrick; Simona Menna; Menna Simona; Silvia Penco; Penco Silvia; Lorenza Meneghetti; Meneghetti Lorenza; Giuseppe Renne; Renne Giuseppe; Enrico Cassano; Cassano Enrico
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2014-04-18       Impact factor: 5.315

3.  Papillomas of the breast: factors associated with underestimation.

Authors:  Gabriela Boufelli; Marcelo A Giannotti; Carlos A Ruiz; Nestor de Barros; Luciano F Chala; Jonathan Y Maesaka; Rodrigo Goncalves; Bárbara H Bresciani; Paula Vianna; José M Soares; Edmund C Baracat; José R Filassi
Journal:  Eur J Cancer Prev       Date:  2018-07       Impact factor: 2.497

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.