Literature DB >> 22344355

Cost-benefit of hospitalization compared with outpatient care for pregnant women with pregestational and gestational diabetes or with mild hyperglycemia, in Brazil.

Ana Claudia Molina Cavassini1, Silvana Andréa Molina Lima, Iracema Mattos Paranhos Calderon, Marilza Vieira Cunha Rudge.   

Abstract

CONTEXT AND
OBJECTIVE: Pregnancies complicated by diabetes are associated with increased numbers of maternal and neonatal complications. Hospital costs increase according to the type of care provided. This study aimed to estimate the cost-benefit relationship and social profitability ratio of hospitalization, compared with outpatient care, for pregnant women with diabetes or mild hyperglycemia. STUDY
DESIGN: This was a prospective observational quantitative study conducted at a university hospital. It included all pregnant women with pregestational or gestational diabetes, or mild hyperglycemia, who did not develop clinical intercurrences during pregnancy and who delivered at the Botucatu Medical School Hospital (Hospital das Clínicas, Faculdade de Medicina de Botucatu, HC-FMB) of Universidade Estadual de São Paulo (Unesp).
METHODS: Thirty pregnant women treated with diet were followed as outpatients, and twenty treated with diet plus insulin were managed through frequent short hospitalizations. Direct costs (personnel, materials and tests) and indirect costs (general expenses) were ascertained from data in the patients' records and the hospital's absorption costing system. The cost-benefit was then calculated.
RESULTS: Successful treatment of pregnant women with diabetes avoided expenditure of US$ 1,517.97 and US$ 1,127.43 for patients treated with inpatient and outpatient care, respectively. The cost-benefit of inpatient care was US$ 143,719.16, and outpatient care, US$ 253,267.22, with social profitability of 1.87 and 5.35, respectively.
CONCLUSION: Decision-tree analysis confirmed that successful treatment avoided costs at the hospital. Cost-benefit analysis showed that outpatient management was economically more advantageous than hospitalization. The social profitability of both treatments was greater than one, thus demonstrating that both types of care for diabetic pregnant women had positive benefits.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22344355     DOI: 10.1590/s1516-31802012000100004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sao Paulo Med J        ISSN: 1516-3180            Impact factor:   1.044


  2 in total

1.  Diagnostic protocol for gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) (IADPSG/ADA, 2011): influence on the occurrence of GDM and mild gestational hyperglycemia (MGH) and on the perinatal outcomes.

Authors:  Mariana Pinto Sirimarco; Helena Maciel Guerra; Eduardo Guimarães Lisboa; Joice Monalisa Vernini; Bianca Nicolosi Cassetari; Roberto Antonio de Araujo Costa; Marilza Vieira Cunha Rudge; Iracema de Mattos Paranhos Calderon
Journal:  Diabetol Metab Syndr       Date:  2017-01-03       Impact factor: 3.320

2.  The Cost of Prenatal Care Services in the City of Aydın: A Cross-Sectional Study.

Authors:  Safiye Özvurmaz; Zekiye Karaçam; Vesile Ünay
Journal:  Florence Nightingale Hemsire Derg       Date:  2019-10-01
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.