Literature DB >> 22344055

Influence of squatting depth on jumping performance.

Hagen Hartmann1, Klaus Wirth, Markus Klusemann, Josip Dalic, Claus Matuschek, Dietmar Schmidtbleicher.   

Abstract

It is unclear if increases in 1 repetition maximum (1RM) in quarter squats result in higher gains compared with full depth squats in isometric force production and vertical jump performance. The aim of the research projects was to compare the effects of different squat variants on the development of 1RM and their transfer effects to Countermovement jump (CMJ) and squat jump (SJ) height, maximal voluntary contraction (MVC), and maximal rate of force development (MRFD). Twenty-three women and 36 men (mean age: 24.11 ± 2.88 years) were parallelized into 3 groups based on their CMJ height: deep front squats (FSQ, n = 20), deep back squats (BSQ, n = 20), and quarter back squats (BSQ¼, n = 19). In addition, a control group (C, n = 16) existed (mean age: 24.38 ± 0.50 years). Experimental groups trained 2 d·wk for 10 weeks with a strength-power block periodization, which produced significant (p ≤ 0.05) gains of the specific squat 1RM. The FSQ and BSQ attained significant (p ≤ 0.05) elevations in SJ and CMJ without any interaction effects between both groups (p ≥ 0.05). The BSQ¼ and C did not reveal any significant changes of SJ and CMJ. The FSQ and BSQ had significantly higher SJ scores over C (p ≤ 0.05). The BSQ did not feature any significant group difference to BSQ¼ (p = 0.116) in SJ, whereas FSQ showed a trend toward higher SJ heights over BSQ¼ (p = 0.052). The FSQ and BSQ presented significantly (p ≤ 0.05) higher CMJ heights over BSQ¼ and C. Posttest in MVC and MRFD demonstrated no significant changes for BSQ. Significant declines in MRFD for FSQ in the right leg (p ≤ 0.05) without any interaction effects for MVC and MRFD between both FSQ and BSQ were found. Training of BSQ¼ resulted in significantly (p ≤ 0.05) lower MRFD and MVC values in contrast to FSQ and BSQ. Quarter squat training elicited significant (p ≤ 0.05) transfer losses into the isometric maximal and explosive strength behavior. These findings therefore contest the concept of superior angle-specific transfer effects. Deep front and back squats guarantee performance-enhancing transfer effects of dynamic maximal strength to dynamic speed-strength capacity of hip and knee extensors compared with quarter squats.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22344055     DOI: 10.1519/JSC.0b013e31824ede62

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Strength Cond Res        ISSN: 1064-8011            Impact factor:   3.775


  9 in total

Review 1.  Core Stability in Athletes: A Critical Analysis of Current Guidelines.

Authors:  Klaus Wirth; Hagen Hartmann; Christoph Mickel; Elena Szilvas; Michael Keiner; Andre Sander
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2017-03       Impact factor: 11.136

2.  The Effect of Two Different Concurrent Training Programs on Strength and Power Gains in Highly-Trained Individuals.

Authors:  Henrik Petré; Pontus Löfving; Niklas Psilander
Journal:  J Sports Sci Med       Date:  2018-05-14       Impact factor: 2.988

3.  Effects of Resistance Training Movement Pattern and Velocity on Isometric Muscular Rate of Force Development: A Systematic Review with Meta-analysis and Meta-regression.

Authors:  Anthony J Blazevich; Cody J Wilson; Pedro E Alcaraz; Jacobo A Rubio-Arias
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2020-05       Impact factor: 11.136

Review 4.  Analysis of the load on the knee joint and vertebral column with changes in squatting depth and weight load.

Authors:  Hagen Hartmann; Klaus Wirth; Markus Klusemann
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2013-10       Impact factor: 11.136

5.  Assessment of Back-Squat Performance at Submaximal Loads: Is the Reliability Affected by the Variable, Exercise Technique, or Repetition Criterion?

Authors:  Alejandro Pérez-Castilla; Danica Janicijevic; Zeki Akyildiz; Deniz Senturk; Amador García-Ramos
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-04-27       Impact factor: 3.390

6.  Acute effects of anterior thigh foam rolling on hip angle, knee angle, and rectus femoris length in the modified Thomas test.

Authors:  Andrew D Vigotsky; Gregory J Lehman; Bret Contreras; Chris Beardsley; Bryan Chung; Erin H Feser
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2015-09-24       Impact factor: 2.984

7.  Measurement errors when estimating the vertical jump height with flight time using photocell devices: the example of Optojump.

Authors:  A Attia; W Dhahbi; A Chaouachi; J Padulo; D P Wong; K Chamari
Journal:  Biol Sport       Date:  2016-12-01       Impact factor: 2.806

8. 

Authors:  Luis Sánchez-Medina; Jesús G Pallarés; Carlos E Pérez; Ricardo Morán-Navarro; Juan José González-Badillo
Journal:  Sports Med Int Open       Date:  2017-03-28

9.  Effects of a Gluteal Muscles Specific Exercise Program on the Vertical Jump.

Authors:  Tomás Gallego-Izquierdo; Gerardo Vidal-Aragón; Pedro Calderón-Corrales; Álvaro Acuña; Alexander Achalandabaso-Ochoa; Agustín Aibar-Almazán; Antonio Martínez-Amat; Daniel Pecos-Martín
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2020-07-27       Impact factor: 3.390

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.