OBJECTIVE: The ankle-brachial index (ABI) is the most useful and efficient tool for assessing the presence of peripheral artery disease (PAD). The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of multiple sequential blood pressure (BP) measurements on the estimation of the ABI and the consequent diagnosis of PAD in a high vascular risk population. METHODS: This is a cross-sectional study of 71 patients admitted to the Cardiology Department or evaluated as outpatients in the Internal Medicine Department at our institution. The ABI was calculated with the first blood pressure (BP) measurement in the arm with the higher BP (dominant arm; method A) and with the average of the second and third measurements in that same arm (method B). The results of both methods were compared. RESULTS: No statistically significant difference was found for the numerical value of ABI between the methods. The κ correlation index for agreement in the diagnosis of PAD between the methods was 0.87 (95% confidence interval: 0.74-0.99). CONCLUSION: Multiple BP measurements had no impact on the final ABI or on the subsequent diagnosis of PAD.
RCT Entities:
OBJECTIVE: The ankle-brachial index (ABI) is the most useful and efficient tool for assessing the presence of peripheral artery disease (PAD). The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of multiple sequential blood pressure (BP) measurements on the estimation of the ABI and the consequent diagnosis of PAD in a high vascular risk population. METHODS: This is a cross-sectional study of 71 patients admitted to the Cardiology Department or evaluated as outpatients in the Internal Medicine Department at our institution. The ABI was calculated with the first blood pressure (BP) measurement in the arm with the higher BP (dominant arm; method A) and with the average of the second and third measurements in that same arm (method B). The results of both methods were compared. RESULTS: No statistically significant difference was found for the numerical value of ABI between the methods. The κ correlation index for agreement in the diagnosis of PAD between the methods was 0.87 (95% confidence interval: 0.74-0.99). CONCLUSION: Multiple BP measurements had no impact on the final ABI or on the subsequent diagnosis of PAD.
Authors: Luigi Petramala; D'Elia Lorenzo; Gino Iannucci; Antonio Concistré; Laura Zinnamosca; Cristiano Marinelli; Giuseppe De Vincentis; Antonio Ciardi; Giorgio De Toma; Claudio Letizia Journal: Endocrinol Metab (Seoul) Date: 2015-09-10