Literature DB >> 22342897

Neonatal morbidity after induction vs expectant monitoring in intrauterine growth restriction at term: a subanalysis of the DIGITAT RCT.

Kim E Boers1, Linda van Wyk, Joris A M van der Post, Anneke Kwee, Maria G van Pampus, Marc E A Spaanderdam, Johannes J Duvekot, Henk A Bremer, Friso M C Delemarre, Kitty W M Bloemenkamp, Christianne J M de Groot, Christine Willekes, Monique Rijken, Frans J M E Roumen, Jim G Thornton, Jan M M van Lith, Ben W J Mol, Saskia le Cessie, Sicco A Scherjon.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The Disproportionate Intrauterine Growth Intervention Trial at Term (DIGITAT) compared induction of labor and expectant management in suspected intrauterine growth restriction (IUGR) at term. In this subanalysis, we report neonatal morbidity between the policies based on the Morbidity Assessment Index for Newborns (MAIN). STUDY
DESIGN: We used data from the DIGITAT. For each neonate, we calculated the MAIN score, a validated outcome scale.
RESULTS: There were no differences in mean MAIN scores or in MAIN morbidity categories. We found that neonatal admissions are lower after 38 weeks' gestational age compared with 36 and 37 weeks in both groups.
CONCLUSION: The incidence of neonatal morbidity in IUGR at term is comparable and relatively mild either after induction or after an expectant policy. However, neonatal admissions are lower after 38 weeks of pregnancy, so if induction to preempt possible stillbirth is considered, it is reasonable to delay until 38 weeks, provided watchful monitoring.
Copyright © 2012 Mosby, Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22342897     DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2012.01.015

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 0002-9378            Impact factor:   8.661


  5 in total

1.  FIGO (international Federation of Gynecology and obstetrics) initiative on fetal growth: best practice advice for screening, diagnosis, and management of fetal growth restriction.

Authors:  Nir Melamed; Ahmet Baschat; Yoav Yinon; Apostolos Athanasiadis; Federico Mecacci; Francesc Figueras; Vincenzo Berghella; Amala Nazareth; Muna Tahlak; H David McIntyre; Fabrício Da Silva Costa; Anne B Kihara; Eran Hadar; Fionnuala McAuliffe; Mark Hanson; Ronald C Ma; Rachel Gooden; Eyal Sheiner; Anil Kapur; Hema Divakar; Diogo Ayres-de-Campos; Liran Hiersch; Liona C Poon; John Kingdom; Roberto Romero; Moshe Hod
Journal:  Int J Gynaecol Obstet       Date:  2021-03       Impact factor: 3.561

2.  Suspected Fetal Growth Restriction at 37 Weeks: A Comparison of Doppler and Placental Pathology.

Authors:  William M Curtin; Karmaine A Millington; Tochi O Ibekwe; Serdar H Ural
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2017-03-20       Impact factor: 3.411

3.  Using perinatal morbidity scoring tools as a primary study outcome.

Authors:  Jennifer A Hutcheon; Lisa M Bodnar; Robert W Platt
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  2017-11       Impact factor: 3.710

Review 4.  Planned early delivery versus expectant management of the term suspected compromised baby for improving outcomes.

Authors:  Diana M Bond; Adrienne Gordon; Jon Hyett; Bradley de Vries; Angela E Carberry; Jonathan Morris
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2015-11-24

5.  Intrauterine Growth Restriction. Guideline of the German Society of Gynecology and Obstetrics (S2k-Level, AWMF Registry No. 015/080, October 2016).

Authors:  Sven Kehl; Jörg Dötsch; Kurt Hecher; Dietmar Schlembach; Dagmar Schmitz; Holger Stepan; Ulrich Gembruch
Journal:  Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd       Date:  2017-11-27       Impact factor: 2.915

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.