Literature DB >> 22341259

The surgical management of pancreatic cancer.

Lea Matsuoka1, Rick Selby, Yuri Genyk.   

Abstract

There have been significant advances made over the years in the areas of critical care, anesthesia, and surgical technique, which have led to improved mortality rates and survival after resection for pancreatic cancer. The standard of care is currently PD or PPPD for pancreatic cancers of the head, uncinate process, or neck and DP for pancreatic cancers of the body or tail. Resections are performed with the goals of negative margins and minimal blood loss, and referral to high-volume centers and surgeons is encouraged. However, 5-year survival rate after curative resection still remains at less than 20%. In an effort to improve survival and extend the limits of resectability, many centers have attempted extended lymphadenectomy and portal venous and even arterial resection and reconstruction. Extended lymphadenectomy has not led to improved survival for these patients. Portal vein resection has increased the number of patients amenable to resection, with equivalent survival rates compared with those of standard resections. Portal vein invasion is thus no longer considered a contraindication to resection at many large centers. Resection and reconstruction of involved arteries have been rarely performed and are currently not considerations for most patients. It is likely that future improvements in survival lie in the realm of adjuvant therapy. As chemotherapeutic and other tumor-directed agents continue to evolve and advance, this will hopefully lead to improved survival for patients undergoing surgical resection for pancreatic cancer.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22341259     DOI: 10.1016/j.gtc.2011.12.015

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gastroenterol Clin North Am        ISSN: 0889-8553            Impact factor:   3.806


  7 in total

1.  Impact of Enhanced Recovery after Surgery protocol on immediate surgical outcome in elderly patients undergoing pancreaticoduodenectomy.

Authors:  Lileswar Kaman; Karikal Chakarbathi; Ashish Gupta; Divya Dahiya; Kaptan Singh; Krishna Ramavath; Arunanshu Behera; Kamal Kajal
Journal:  Updates Surg       Date:  2019-01-23

2.  Clinical outcomes of pancreaticoduodenectomy in octogenarians: a surgeon's experience from 2007 to 2015.

Authors:  Diana H Liang; Beverly A Shirkey; Wade R Rosenberg; Sylvia Martinez
Journal:  J Gastrointest Oncol       Date:  2016-08

Review 3.  Is routine drainage necessary after pancreaticoduodenectomy?

Authors:  Qiang Wang; Yong-Jian Jiang; Ji Li; Feng Yang; Yang Di; Lie Yao; Chen Jin; De-Liang Fu
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2014-07-07       Impact factor: 5.742

4.  A model to predict survival following pancreaticoduodenectomy for malignancy based on tumour site, stage and lymph node ratio.

Authors:  Bobby V M Dasari; Keith J Roberts; James Hodson; Lewis Stevens; Andrew M Smith; Stefan G Hubscher; John Isaac; Paolo Muiesan; Robert P Sutcliffe; Ravi Marudanayagam; Darius F Mirza
Journal:  HPB (Oxford)       Date:  2016-02-24       Impact factor: 3.647

5.  Is there any evidence of a "July effect" in patients undergoing major cancer surgery?

Authors:  Praful Ravi; Vincent Q Trinh; Maxine Sun; Jesse Sammon; Shyam Sukumar; Mai-Kim Gervais; Shahrokh F Shariat; Simon P Kim; Keith J Kowalczyk; Jim C Hu; Mani Menon; Pierre I Karakiewicz; Quoc-Dien Trinh
Journal:  Can J Surg       Date:  2014-04       Impact factor: 2.089

Review 6.  Imaging and Therapy of Pancreatic Cancer with Phosphatidylserine-Targeted Nanovesicles.

Authors:  Victor M Blanco; Tahir Latif; Zhengtao Chu; Xiaoyang Qi
Journal:  Transl Oncol       Date:  2015-06       Impact factor: 4.243

7.  Soluble B7-H3 promotes the invasion and metastasis of pancreatic carcinoma cells through the TLR4/NF-κB pathway.

Authors:  Chao Xie; Danqing Liu; Qijun Chen; Chong Yang; Bo Wang; Heshui Wu
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-06-08       Impact factor: 4.379

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.