OBJECTIVES: Annuloplasty for functional tricuspid regurgitation may sometimes be ineffective because of chamber dilation and valve tethering. This study compared a novel technique, right ventricle (RV)-papillary muscle approximation, with annuloplasty in experimentally-produced tricuspid regurgitation. METHODS: RVs of isolated porcine hearts (n = 10) were statically pressurized, which led to RV dilation and central tricuspid regurgitation. Regurgitant flow was measured with a saline solution-filled column. The head of the anterior papillary muscle was approximated to 4 points on the ventricular septum. Next, a prosthetic ring was implanted, and then RV-papillary muscle approximation was combined. Tricuspid annular dimension, RV geometry, and tricuspid valve tethering were analyzed with 3-dimensional echocardiography. RESULTS: Tricuspid regurgitation (2270 ± 186 mL/min) was reduced by RV-papillary muscle approximation alone (214 ± 45 mL/min; P < .05) more than by annuloplasty alone (724 ± 166 mL/min; P < .05). Combined RV-papillary muscle approximation and annuloplasty resulted in the least regurgitation (80 ± 39 mL/min). RV-papillary muscle approximation reduced tricuspid septolateral diameter (25%; P < .05), and annular area (23%; P < .05), as did annuloplasty. RV-papillary muscle approximation also reduced RV sphericity index (33%; P < .05) and tricuspid tethering height (54%; P < .05), whereas annuloplasty did not. Direction of RV-papillary muscle approximation did not independently affect outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: This ex vivo study suggests that RV-papillary muscle approximation potentially repairs tricuspid regurgitation better than annuloplasty by improving ventricular sphericity and valve tethering as well as annular dimension.
OBJECTIVES: Annuloplasty for functional tricuspid regurgitation may sometimes be ineffective because of chamber dilation and valve tethering. This study compared a novel technique, right ventricle (RV)-papillary muscle approximation, with annuloplasty in experimentally-produced tricuspid regurgitation. METHODS: RVs of isolated porcine hearts (n = 10) were statically pressurized, which led to RV dilation and central tricuspid regurgitation. Regurgitant flow was measured with a saline solution-filled column. The head of the anterior papillary muscle was approximated to 4 points on the ventricular septum. Next, a prosthetic ring was implanted, and then RV-papillary muscle approximation was combined. Tricuspid annular dimension, RV geometry, and tricuspid valve tethering were analyzed with 3-dimensional echocardiography. RESULTS:Tricuspid regurgitation (2270 ± 186 mL/min) was reduced by RV-papillary muscle approximation alone (214 ± 45 mL/min; P < .05) more than by annuloplasty alone (724 ± 166 mL/min; P < .05). Combined RV-papillary muscle approximation and annuloplasty resulted in the least regurgitation (80 ± 39 mL/min). RV-papillary muscle approximation reduced tricuspid septolateral diameter (25%; P < .05), and annular area (23%; P < .05), as did annuloplasty. RV-papillary muscle approximation also reduced RV sphericity index (33%; P < .05) and tricuspid tethering height (54%; P < .05), whereas annuloplasty did not. Direction of RV-papillary muscle approximation did not independently affect outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: This ex vivo study suggests that RV-papillary muscle approximation potentially repairs tricuspid regurgitation better than annuloplasty by improving ventricular sphericity and valve tethering as well as annular dimension.
Authors: Alex V Nguyen; Andras Lasso; Hannah H Nam; Jennifer Faerber; Ahmed H Aly; Alison M Pouch; Adam B Scanlan; Francis X McGowan; Laura Mercer-Rosa; Meryl S Cohen; John Simpson; Gabor Fichtinger; Matthew A Jolley Journal: J Am Soc Echocardiogr Date: 2019-02-28 Impact factor: 5.251
Authors: Haruo Yamauchi; Eric N Feins; Nikolay V Vasilyev; Shogo Shimada; David Zurakowski; Pedro J Del Nido Journal: Circulation Date: 2013-09-10 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Devin W Laurence; Emily L Johnson; Ming-Chen Hsu; Ryan Baumwart; Arshid Mir; Harold M Burkhart; Gerhard A Holzapfel; Yi Wu; Chung-Hao Lee Journal: Int J Numer Method Biomed Eng Date: 2020-05-08 Impact factor: 2.747